Quote:
Originally Posted by Capsicum
Wouldn't you say though that most Francophones in Anglo-Canada are able to stave off assimilation much more than Franco-Americans just because of the whole institutional framework of support for French federally even if weak especially in western Canada, plus the probably higher rates of visiting other Francophone communities or visiting Quebec itself, even if one doesn't move back there, the option is more available.
|
Cultural and linguistic assimilation in modern countries isn't about people being forced to stop using their mother tongue (which did happen a lot in the past). It is more that people end up in situations where cultural preservation is an uphill battle that requires extra effort so it is abandoned. If French is part of the path of least resistance it survives and if it isn't it slowly disappears. I am highly skeptical of the idea that cultures can be kept relevant through love and enthusiasm alone. A big part of language regulation in Quebec has to do with constructing a society where French is a natural choice for day-to-day life, and that is mostly missing in the rest of Canada outside of a few places.
People who want to move to Quebec can but if you grow up in, say, BC, is that very likely? It is possible but not common enough to be demographically significant.
I think Quebec is a good environment for French culture, NB and Eastern Ontario are marginal, and in most other places there is a high degree of intergenerational assimilation (some offer more French language opportunities than others but none would be viable long term on their own without new Francophones moving in). If you are interested, I think Statistics Canada tracks linguistic assimilation.
It's true that just about anywhere in Canada is better than just about anywhere in the US. But I think this is the case where Quebec is 9/10, NB is 6/10, many other Canadian provinces are a 2/10 or 3/10, and the US is mostly a 1/10. The US is not a useful benchmark for Francophone culture.