HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Three World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3561  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2014, 1:14 PM
wilfredo267 wilfredo267 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New York City
Posts: 135
l'm positive they will vote for it.
     
     
  #3562  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2014, 1:33 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian.odonnell20 View Post
I wish Silverstein would just make wtc2 and 3 mixed use, they would have so much less lease space to worry about. I don't know if it's possible, but I know that other towers downtown have converted offices to residences.

Residential currently not allowed on Port Authority property, although they are flirting with the idea for the site of tower 5 (there is some technicality there). But that isn't the answer, and it's not why the original WTC complex was built, nor is it the reason it's being rebuilt.

They have decided to not repeat the process of original WTC construction, which took years before the towers were filled. If you are going to build to market demand, that takes time. 10 msf is a lot to absorb at once, even for New York. I'm sure Silverstein will get tenants for the towers.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #3563  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2014, 8:58 PM
weidncol weidncol is offline
weidncol
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 386
Looks like they are preparing for construction...

(Click for larger image)
     
     
  #3564  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2014, 9:09 PM
Submariner's Avatar
Submariner Submariner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by weidncol View Post
Looks like they are preparing for construction...

(Click for larger image)
How do you figure that?
     
     
  #3565  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2014, 9:15 PM
weidncol weidncol is offline
weidncol
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 386
All the materials on the roof is quite a big hint. They may just have that up there to be prepared for when it gets the go, however.
     
     
  #3566  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2014, 11:11 PM
Submariner's Avatar
Submariner Submariner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by weidncol View Post
All the materials on the roof is quite a big hint. They may just have that up there to be prepared for when it gets the go, however.
Gotchya. I wasn't sure if those were new additions or not.
     
     
  #3567  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 1:11 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,912
http://www.downtownexpress.com/2014/...t-more-delays/

TALKING POINT: W.T.C. needs Port support, not more delays





March 27, 2014
BY DAVID STANKE


Quote:
The Port Authority is on the brink of ensuring that the World Trade Center will be restored some 17 years after its complete destruction. This is not a bold accomplishment, and given the history of indecision and misdirection, it should also be no surprise that the Port is about to blink.

If the Port provides a loan guarantee to Silverstein Properties Inc., the developer will proceed with the construction of W.T.C. 3 and in a few years, the site will have three completed office buildings, three contiguous blocks of retail attached to an iconic transportation hub, and the economic and spiritual center of Lower Manhattan will be fully operational (although still not complete).

If the Port blinks, the W.T.C. will be mired with two stalled buildings and segmented retail.

The P.A. is debating whether to expand an existing loan guarantee for S.P.I. on W.T.C. 3 to $1.2 billion, about one half the cost of the building. In exchange, Silverstein would pay interest and fees to the Port, increase equity in the building to $500 million, and give the authority a foreclosure option. Under best circumstances, the P.A. will earn fees for the guarantee and lose nothing. Under worst circumstances, they will get a $2-billion, architecturally-significant building with an anchor tenant in the best location south of 35th Street for 50% of the cost. Silverstein would suffer an intolerable loss of both their equity and $500 million in insurance proceeds, under this scenario.

The loan guarantee would ensure that the site would be largely functional within four years, leaving just one office tower and the cultural center on hold. Connections with surrounding buildings and communities, and three blocks of retail would be open. It would ensure that, 17 years after the destruction of the W.T.C., the spiritual center of Lower Manhattan would be back. Better late than never.

Often there are divisions at the Port between appointees of New York and those of New Jersey, but in this case, two New York appointees are battling, according to the New York Times. While Scott Rechler, the Port’s vice chairperson, is negotiating these guarantees with S.P.I., another board member, Kenneth Lipper, opposes the plan because of the risk it adds to the authority’s financial position and because he wants the P.A. to invest in a bus terminal modernization in Midtown. And so it is with the Port. Words come out one side, contradictory words come out another.

The W.T.C. was the target of a direct attack on the continental U.S. by foreign enemies, but the obligation to restore the site is considered by Lipper to be just a “patriotic gesture” and a “vanity project.” Excuse me sir, but to neighbors of the site, rebuilding the W.T.C. is a moral obligation of this country— the Port Authority’s moral obligation.

As a residential neighbor of the W.T.C., I am in favor of accelerated completion of the site.

The loan backstop is a good financial bet. While there is office space available in surrounding buildings, there are regular announcements of companies interested in making the move Downtown, Time Magazine being the latest. As properties become available, they will fill, because the rents are competitive and the facilities will be first class.

W.T.C. 3 will not be available for 4 years, by which time the current space nearing occupancy should be largely occupied: W.T.C. 1 is already 55% occupied while W.T.C. 4 is 60% full. For reference, W.T.C. 7 has 1.7 million square feet and was empty when it was completed in 2006 but was 100% leased at high rates by 2011, at a time when the rest of the W.T.C. was still a stagnant wasteland.

Completion of W.T.C. 3 will remove uncertainty concerning future construction. The Westfield Group has indicated that it will not take the W.T.C. 3 retail space until the tower is complete, delaying another $150 million payment to the P.A.
The removal of uncertainty will be a major selling factor for both the P.A. and Silverstein as they market available office space.

The loan guarantee benefits New Jersey as well as New York. New Jersey residents will have expanded job opportunities in New York with convenient and efficient transportation. Peripheral businesses, both commercial and residential, will thrive across the Hudson River.

The states of New York and New Jersey have already mismanaged the reconstruction of the W.T.C. by approving excessively expensive plans, by delaying action.

The governors may not like the current position, but we are in it because of their predecessors. Getting W.T.C. 3 built will help cover 13 years of mistakes. Pulling back now will simply expose the P.A. to the full weight of the previous excesses.

Government in some way subsidizes all private enterprise; it’s just that some get more subsidies than others. The question is, whose friends are going to get subsidized and how? S.P.I. has operated under the reverse subsidy (i.e. penalty) of P.A. indecision and inaction for too long. The loan guarantee is just balancing the ledger.

Perhaps, Gov. Christie is against W.T.C. development because it will compete with projects across the river, or maybe he just wants to punish somebody. The scope of pettiness within the decision-making corridors of the P.A. have been completely exposed by the George Washington Bridge scandal.

Ironically, the P.A. was originally given the site because it could accelerate development of a new commercial center to revitalize the then stagnant Downtown. Now, it should be pretty clear to the casual observer that the Port Authority can’t execute in a reliable, predictable, manner. It is the Great Oz. Sounds emanate from behind the smoke and mirrors. But we in the audience never really know who is behind the sound. We are prisoners of obscurity in a Downtown interrupted.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #3568  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 10:52 PM
Hypothalamus's Avatar
Hypothalamus Hypothalamus is offline
Homo sapiens sapiens
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 3rd planet from the Sun
Posts: 1,666
More stuff on top:

As of March 28th, 2014 (7 PM EST)...


EarthCam
__________________
“If I have done the public any service, it is due to my patient thought.” ― Isaac Newton

~ My Stamford, CT Thread ~~ My Danbury, CT Thread ~
     
     
  #3569  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2014, 6:34 AM
davidinasia davidinasia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubeworm View Post
More stuff on top:

As of March 28th, 2014 (7 PM EST)...


EarthCam
Looks promising, but has anyone considered the possibility that this stuff might just be for capping the rebar to prevent corrosion, as was already done with T2? If so we could be in for even more delay.

I hope I'm wrong, but this latest kerfuffle with the Port Authority doesn't sound good... it's reopening issues that we all thought had been resolved years ago.
     
     
  #3570  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2014, 7:07 AM
weidncol weidncol is offline
weidncol
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 386
Most of the stuff up there appears to be material for scaffolding and rebar. I would assume it's material to prepare for construction again, but that's just a wild guess. Once the cranes arrive, we'll know it's official.
     
     
  #3571  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2014, 7:26 PM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
The article a few posts above says it all . . . now it's just a matter of wait-and-see. For what it's worth, my thought is to simply keep the momentum going. Look forward to hearing the result of the vote.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
     
     
  #3572  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2014, 5:15 PM
Enigmatism415's Avatar
Enigmatism415 Enigmatism415 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 225
Lipper is infuriatingly shortsighted. Does he not appreciate the context of the situation? I'm not against modernizing Midtown bus terminals, but now is not the time! Silverstein worked hard and smart to secure a sufficiently large anchor tenant for 3WTC only weeks before the deadline, and Rechler devised a brilliant plan that allows the Port Authority to grant Silverstein the final piece of the puzzle with no loss to their establishment.

We're so close, and this vote will either unravel the tapestry or mend one of its largest holes.
     
     
  #3573  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2014, 2:23 AM
weidncol weidncol is offline
weidncol
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 386
McGraw Hill to depart namesake tower in move to lower Manhattan http://www.northjersey.com/news/busi....PCyq3Anv.dpuf

Quote:
McGraw Hill, which has been in the 52-story Midtown tower since it was completed in 1972, will depart by the end of next year, according to the earnings call.
Quote:
The inquiries into a potential relocation to the World Trade Center site or Hudson Yards, the Related Cos. development on the far west side, are in early stages and a commitment may be at least a year away, according to the people with knowledge of the matter. McGraw Hill would want at least 750,000 square feet at wherever it moves, one person said.
Quote:
At the World Trade Center site, the company is focusing its interest on 3 World Trade Center, where developer Larry Silverstein is seeking additional tenants to join British advertising firm GroupM Inc., according to the person.

Silverstein is in negotiations for a government guarantee to help him finance the skyscraper, which would be the third at the lower Manhattan site.

Bud Perrone, a Silverstein spokesman; Joanna Rose, a spokeswoman for Related; and Robert McGrath, a spokesman for CBRE Group Inc., which is representing McGraw Hill, declined to comment.
     
     
  #3574  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2014, 11:54 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,912
Quote:
...a commitment may be at least a year away, according to the people with knowledge of the matter. McGraw Hill would want at least 750,000 square feet


The WTC is always in play...someone will eventually stick...


http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article...essure-on-port


Robust leasing downtown puts pressure on Port
Figures showing a sharp drop in the amount of office space available downtown seems to buttress the case for one more tower to be built at the World Trade Center site



Daniel Geiger
April 1, 2014


Quote:
The first quarter office-leasing numbers in Manhattan are in, and at least one real estate executive says they provide evidence the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey should go ahead and pony up expanded financial guarantees for a gargantuan new office tower at the World Trade Center.

According to data from Colliers International, the availability rate downtown, which is the amount of space presently vacated combined with space that is expected to be vacant over the next year, shriveled to 14.4% in the first three months of the year, from 16.1% a year earlier. The drop was the largest of any office market in Manhattan and was driven by a major uptick of leasing downtown, according to Joseph Harbert, president of Colliers International’s eastern region operations.

Rents rose in lower Manhattan in the period by 10.6% to $50.25 per square foot on average.

The drop in availability comes despite major amounts of empty space downtown, with huge vacancies at Brookfield Place, the large office complex on the western edge of the financial district, at the World Trade Center site and also at a host of other buildings including 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza. It is those vacancies that have spurred concerns over whether the Port Authority should provide a $1.2 billion financial guarantee for 3 World Trade Center, a 2.8 million-square-foot skyscraper that developer Larry Silverstein wants to raise at the site.

Brookfield Properties, the owner of Brookfield Place, has moved to fill many of those holes, bringing in a subsidiary of the Drug Enforcement Administration in recent weeks and also larger tenants like law firm Jones Day.

Mr. Harbert feels the neighborhood’s strides provide evidence that at the end of the years-long process it will take to raise a building of the magnitude of 3 WTC, the market will be strong enough to absorb its millions of square feet of new space. Already, Mr. Silverstein has a leasing commitment from the media and advertising company GroupM to take roughly 500,000 square feet at the property.

“Companies are increasingly moving downtown because their workforce lives in Brooklyn and New Jersey and so lower Manhattan is an incredibly convenient location for them,” Mr. Harbert said. “We’re right at the cusp where average rents downtown have risen high enough where tenants won’t mind paying the premium for new office space like 3 World Trade Center.”
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #3575  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2014, 2:18 PM
wilfredo267 wilfredo267 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New York City
Posts: 135
From all the pro construction articles that l read l would imagine that the pressure is building for the PA to approve the funds.
     
     
  #3576  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2014, 7:34 PM
Enigmatism415's Avatar
Enigmatism415 Enigmatism415 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilfredo267 View Post
From all the pro construction articles that l read l would imagine that the pressure is building for the PA to approve the funds.
Score one for the good guys!

---

My morbid curiosity leads me to ponder the consequences of an unfavorable outcome in the PA vote. Will Silverstein simply nullify the GroupM lease and sit on his hands indefinitely? Will he fund the construction out of his own pocket? Does he have another potential guarantor up his sleeve?
     
     
  #3577  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2014, 6:13 PM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
I'll turn on the red light for the biscuit in the basket when I see a photo-op of a PA potentates mugging with up 175 and 200G's newly secured anchor tenants and one of those multi-figure gimmick checks per.

Last edited by JayPro; Apr 4, 2014 at 10:07 PM.
     
     
  #3578  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2014, 8:18 PM
Hypothalamus's Avatar
Hypothalamus Hypothalamus is offline
Homo sapiens sapiens
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 3rd planet from the Sun
Posts: 1,666
As of April 5th, 2014 (4PM EST)...



__________________
“If I have done the public any service, it is due to my patient thought.” ― Isaac Newton

~ My Stamford, CT Thread ~~ My Danbury, CT Thread ~
     
     
  #3579  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2014, 8:46 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilfredo267 View Post
From all the pro construction articles that l read l would imagine that the pressure is building for the PA to approve the funds.
It all depends on what the governor (Cuomo) wants to do, what will be a gain for him politically. So far, the idea we've heard about shifting attention away from the WTC to the PA bus terminal came from just one of the commissioners and the rest haven't been and normally don't say anything about PA business. The only board meeting for this month is on April 23, so I presume that's when the issue will be taken up.


http://www.panynj.gov/corporate-info...overnance.html

Quote:
The governor of each state appoints six members of the agency's Board of Commissioners, subject to state senate approval. Commissioners serve as public officials without pay for overlapping six-year terms. The governors retain the right to veto the actions of the Commissioners from his or her own state. Board meetings are public.

An Executive Director, appointed by the Board of Commissioners, is responsible for managing the operation of the Port Authority in a manner consistent with the agency's policies, as established by the Board.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #3580  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2014, 2:23 PM
drumz0rz drumz0rz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 623
Looks like they're preparing to cap it...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.