HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 1:02 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
I wonder if this is a large group or a few vocal NIMBYs. In my opinion, this development will increase nearby property values.
If there were a significant number of people opposing the development it probably would have been mentioned. In the past these "groups" have sometimes been 1 or 2 people who managed to get a couple signatures. Back when Gladstone Ridge was proposed the media kept going to the same couple who lived in a nearby house.

In this particular case the guy also does not have anything approaching a reasonable argument that would hold up at the NSUARB. Properties are rezoned all the time and the fallacious slippery slope argument about future developments is totally irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 1:22 AM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
This was my favorite part of the article:

Quote:
Connaught-Quinpool Coun. Jennifer Watts said she has heard some concerns about the development. But the councillor said encouraging residential density on the peninsula should also be considered.

“This site has been vacant for many, many, many years,” said Watts on Sunday.

“Part of what I’m hearing is that we don’t want more traffic in that area, but the bigger picture (is) if we don’t build up density actually on the peninsula … it just might mean there will be more and more people living off the peninsula and driving in.”
Maybe - just maybe she's starting to get it...
You know what would be interesting is if WM Fares did a mock up of what the existing zoning allowed at worst case. I wonder if people would be quite so happy to support leaving the zoning alone if they saw how close up the building could be...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 1:32 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Watts is far too conservative in terms of the scale of developments that she supports, but her comment on traffic was a good one. A lot of people don't even remotely get traffic and regional planning.

I think a huge part of it is that people look at their own lifestyle and extrapolate based on that -- so if they have 2 cars for their household and they drive at rush hour they think everybody in the 27 unit building will. That's not how it works. In Fenwick car ownership is something ridiculously low like 10-20% (if I recall correctly -- it was in an article that also talked about traffic issues) and some of those people probably do not have to commute at peak times (seniors typically try to avoid busy times). On balance these buildings can be good for traffic if they make transit more viable for everybody, including those living in houses who would not have bus service if their neighbourhood were only low density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 1:33 AM
haligonia's Avatar
haligonia haligonia is offline
Urban Thinker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
This was my favorite part of the article:



Maybe - just maybe she's starting to get it...
You know what would be interesting is if WM Fares did a mock up of what the existing zoning allowed at worst case. I wonder if people would be quite so happy to support leaving the zoning alone if they saw how close up the building could be...
Watts is one of the most intelligent councillors we've got.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 10:20 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by haligonia View Post
Watts is one of the most intelligent councillors we've got.
But she has absolutely no common sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 2:39 PM
haligonia's Avatar
haligonia haligonia is offline
Urban Thinker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
But she has absolutely no common sense.
Differing political views doesn't mean that she lacks common sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 3:05 PM
DB15 DB15 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by haligonia View Post
Differing political views doesn't mean that she lacks common sense.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 3:57 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by haligonia View Post
Differing political views doesn't mean that she lacks common sense.
I'd have to disagree, she definitely lacks common sense. The whole mission against any and all motor vehicle transit improvements is insanity. (i.e. even a discussion about widening Bayers Rd.)

People will always drive cars... they will likely be electric in the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 3:58 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by haligonia View Post
Watts is one of the most intelligent councillors we've got.
Also, intelligence does not mean common sense... some of the smartest people are the most clueless when it comes to logical planning activities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 5:44 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Even the most intelligent politicians have stupid constituents to please.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 6:35 PM
ILoveHalifax ILoveHalifax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Palm Beach Gardens FL
Posts: 1,059
Watts agenda

I get the impression that Watts has her own agenda, to keep her world just like it is. The door to Halifax was closed right behind her and nobody else should be permitted to move into the city, or use the facilities in the city other than what they are used for now.
I don't think she is interested in development and encourages opposition to development at public meetings.
She does speak and presents her point of view very well.
That's how I see it; just my opinion
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2012, 7:35 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,016
She takes her marching orders from Kommissar Howard Epstein and is a puppet for the Ecology Action Center. Her first motion after getting elected was to get HRM to ban bottled water. She thinks 7 storey buildings are as tall as should be allowed and that they should be made out of wood.

I rest my case.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2012, 1:56 AM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,683
Here is a quick site shot I took today.

__________________
I can't hear you with my eyes closed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2012, 4:21 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Yeah, that shows just how run down the corner looks. A new building will be a huge improvement and will probably bring up property values. It's crazy that people fight to preserve some of these places that are unattractive and more importantly, at the end of the day, benefit nobody aside from maybe vandals and advertising agencies. Downtown Dartmouth around the canal is similar.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2013, 2:09 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,354
This project is moving forward. First Reading for the rezoning and proposed DA is on Monday March 18th (2013).

http://www.halifax.ca/Commcoun/west/...fordStreet.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2013, 3:50 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,354
Rezoning and Development Agreement public hearing is set for Monday April 22nd at the Halifax & West Community Council meeting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2013, 5:18 AM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Jesus from that picture Bayers Road looks in rough shape! Can't wait for this to be built (and hopefully the road repaired).
Just read through the report and the minutes of the Public Information Meeting (PIM) - looks like support for the project tended to be higher than opposition; which is good.

Last edited by halifaxboyns; Mar 20, 2013 at 5:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2013, 10:42 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
Jesus from that picture Bayers Road looks in rough shape! Can't wait for this to be built (and hopefully the road repaired).
No, we're not allowed to do that in Halifax. Apparently having decent roads leads to spontaneous development and economic growth, which the planning types say is bad for us. No we will continue with our plan to rip up all paved roads and replace them with dirt cartpaths to encourage people to live in hovels on the peninsula. It's sound planning theory.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2013, 5:03 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
According to ANS, the developers of this project plan to begin construction this summer. They're not waiting to pre-sell units.

The article also mentioned an 11 or 12 storey project on Robie Street in the North End, in addition to the 19 storey Lion's Head Tavern redevelopment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2013, 3:09 AM
teddifax's Avatar
teddifax teddifax is offline
Halifax Promoter!
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
According to ANS, the developers of this project plan to begin construction this summer. They're not waiting to pre-sell units.

The article also mentioned an 11 or 12 storey project on Robie Street in the North End, in addition to the 19 storey Lion's Head Tavern redevelopment.
I don't remember seeing anything on a redevelopment on the Lions's Head site, where is this and what is the Robie St. development also?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:36 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.