HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:25 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
The race for Edmonton's next office tower

Epcor (250-320,000sqft RFP)along with many other small/mid sized firms are looking for more space so proposals have been coming out of the woodwork...here they are:


1. Melcor - 102st and Jasper avenue - ~20 floors




2. GE/Dundee - 101st and Jasper Avenue - 25 floors



3. Qualico "stationlands" - 101st and 105ave - 25 floors



4. Oxford - 101st and 104ave - ?25?

TBA - heard it is hot



we are suppose to have decisions on these shortly
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:26 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
amazing how ^ makes melcor and ge look very similar.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:31 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
The first and 3rd are pretty nice, but still not sure about the second.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:32 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
im waiting to see Oxford's...im expecting them to bring something very good.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:40 PM
ExcaliburKid's Avatar
ExcaliburKid ExcaliburKid is offline
Derp
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,179
Really looking forward to Oxford and Procura. I can see the towers on Jasper going ahead before StationLands though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:45 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
^absolutely...

personally i rank them this way in terms of viability:

1.melcor - medium sized tower, best location (lrt/commerce/manu).
2.oxford - medium sized tower, B location but tied into bell/mall/sutton, and doesnt have to deal with demo to the scale of GE.
3.GE/dundee - medium sized tower, parking will be tough, great location.
4.procura - huge tower, complicated with mixed use, good location.
5.stationlands - another kick at the can.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:51 PM
tony0911 tony0911 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 484
Melcor's design is very disappointing, especially for the location. If Epcor does a new tower I can't see but maybe one other proposal going ahead considering that professional is a done deal. If Ironwood doesn't happen a slim outside chance of another tower then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:57 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
^ironwood will be office condos which wont affect traditional tenants.

Professional looks to be going for FED or PROV space

I could see EPCOR taking one tower and 1 or 2 others going along with the above.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 4:10 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,731
I like the Melcor design, but I may be a little biased towards them since I grew up with part of the Melton family here in Calgary!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 4:16 PM
psych1 psych1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 156
The GE/Dundee building looks like it has a shiny gum wrapper stuck to it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 7:56 PM
brento79
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
based merely on look, I like qualico, it actually looks nice with cn
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 8:58 PM
nunuangel99's Avatar
nunuangel99 nunuangel99 is offline
NUNUANGEL
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by brento79 View Post
based merely on look, I like qualico, it actually looks nice with cn
Gotta say I have to agree with you!!
__________________
Edmonton... Tried, Tested, and True!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 9:12 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,064
Yeah but Qualico's is in such a bad spot and tied to such a bad project
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 9:21 PM
nunuangel99's Avatar
nunuangel99 nunuangel99 is offline
NUNUANGEL
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
Yeah but Qualico's is in such a bad spot and tied to such a bad project
Bad project yes, bad spot ?? it is kiddy corner from Oxford's proposed site (staples) so how bad is it really??
__________________
Edmonton... Tried, Tested, and True!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 9:25 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
^pardon the pun, but stationlands is on the other side of the tracks:>
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 9:38 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,064
Terrible Location! Its so far North of the CBD.

Better to see a tower along Jasper where the action is.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 10:03 PM
Innersoul1's Avatar
Innersoul1 Innersoul1 is offline
City of Blinding Lights
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
I like the Melcor design, but I may be a little biased towards them since I grew up with part of the Melton family here in Calgary!
Same reasoning! But actually I really do like that design!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 10:19 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunuangel99 View Post
Bad project yes, bad spot ?? it is kiddy corner from Oxford's proposed site (staples) so how bad is it really??
If a building occupied the parking lot directly east of Staples and the SW corner of 101 and 104 Avenue connecting it via pedway or u/g tunnel, then the Stationlands tower would be more integrated with the CBD. Until then its an island.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 10:20 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
^IMO a great site for a new 30 storey HYATT...
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2007, 12:45 AM
Atlguy33 Atlguy33 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 878
Hmmmm... I think my favorite is the Melcor proposal, just wish it could be taller. I do like the new look of the Stationlands tower, but agree it's a longshot.
__________________
"Oh, I'm afraid the deflector shield will be quite operational when your friends arrive."
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.