HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 1:59 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,358
Ottawa Rapid Transit Network

As per demand, this thread is reserved for discussions regarding the developments of the APPROVED Rapid Transit Network only, to make real progress easier to follow:



Not allowed in this thread:
- theoretical technologies (PRT, PAT, MagLev etc)
- alternate transit plans that contradict what's already approved (issues regarding options to the Western Parkway or future extensions are OK)
- General BRT vs. LRT debates

Those discussions should remain in the "The future of Ottawa's Transit" thread or their own threads.

Post away!

Last edited by Kitchissippi; Sep 12, 2008 at 3:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 2:00 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,358
FROM OTTAWA.CA:

Notice of Public Open Houses

Moving Forward with Ottawa’s Transportation Future

Ottawa - We want to hear from you!  

The City of Ottawa is currently updating its Transportation Master Plan (TMP), a document that explains the need for future transit, roads, pathways and other transportation infrastructure, and provides guidance on where and when they will be built.

As the TMP update enters its final stages, the City is seeking input on different implementation scenarios for the transit network, as well as costs, benefits and associated risks. Residents can view the different scenarios and provide comments at the open houses or join the conversation on the OttawaTALKS online discussion forum from September 11 to 30 at ottawa.ca/tmp. Other ways of providing feedback include via e-mail to plan@ottawa.ca or by calling 3-1-1.

Open houses will be held from 6 to 8:30 p.m., with table discussions at 7 p.m.  To register for a discussion group, visit ottawa.ca/tmp.

Thursday, September 11
Ottawa City Hall – Main Floor Rotunda Area
110 Laurier Avenue West (at Elgin Street)
Transit Routes: 5, 6 and 14

Monday, September 15
Jim Durrell Recreation Centre – Elwood Hall
1265 Walkley Road (near Bank Street)
Transit Routes: 1, 8, 82, 88, and 97

Tuesday, September 16
Bob MacQuarrie Recreation Complex – Orléans
1490 Youville Drive (near Highway 174)
Transit Routes: 31, 95, 101, 102, 127, and 131

Thursday, September 18
Glen Cairn Community Centre (Upper Hall)
186 Morrena Drive (near Castlefrank and Hazeldean)
Transit Routes: 63, 64, 96,118 and 161

Monday, September 22
Nepean Sportsplex – Salon A
1701 Woodroffe Avenue (near West Hunt Club)
Transit Routes: 70, 71, 73, 76, 77, 95, 157 and 188
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 3:39 PM
Cre47's Avatar
Cre47 Cre47 is offline
Awesome!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orleans, ON
Posts: 1,971
Ottawa Sun article - seems the east end is more preffered and Jan is fuming. Well Jan blame on the residents of Westboro for that, although if the Strandherd Bridge is built at the same time much of the construction is done, I could see an extension to Barrhaven without worrying about the Westboro NIMBYS.

Meanwhile, the streetcar option and the hopstial complex by-pass is also on the maps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Puddicombe

Street cars new wrinkle in transit plans

Councillors to hear 4 options today

By DEREK PUDDICOMBE, Sun Media

City commuters might be presented with a choice of light rail or street cars for their downtown transit system.

As part of four scenarios which city staff will present to councillors this morning, a street car line along Carling Ave. has been drawn into the long-range plans.

The Carling Ave. street car would would be built into the current roadway and stop at each traffic light. The option is being presented is in case the National Capital Commission does not give the city permission to run light rail along the Ottawa River Parkway.

The city operates OC Transpo buses along the parkway with permission from the NCC, but the federal body has been non-committal on whether it would allow LRT along the corridor. The parkway route is a vital link in the city's plan for light rail to the west end.

Councillors Clive Doucet and Christine Leadman contend the NCC won't green-light a rail system along the parkway, and suggest street cars as an alternative.


The pair have argued all along that taking light rail down the parkway will destroy its environmental integrity. They also admit the Carling Ave. route isn't a new idea.

But, as straight arterial route which links to Hwy. 417, the existing western Transitway, the downtown and Quebec via the existing O-Train line, they say it's the best way for the city to connect the downtown with the west end.

As reported in the Sun today, scenario three is shaping up to be the preferred option among councillors to begin construction of the city's $4 billion, 23-year transit plan. This option includes 30 km of light rail, including from Riverside South to the University of Ottawa, and the Blair Rd. transit station.

It also includes a bus bypass that must be built to maintain commuter service while a portion of the east-end transitway is converted to light rail.

The route also takes light rail to Tunney Pasture.

Barrhaven Coun. Jan Harder is fuming that nowhere in the grand plan is any light rail for Barrhaven.

She said it would only take an extra few million dollars added to the $4 billion plan to service commuters with light rail. Barrhaven's population has almost tripled from 25,000 in 2000, and it could be home to 175,000 people by 2031 when the transit plan is to be completed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 3:50 PM
Cre47's Avatar
Cre47 Cre47 is offline
Awesome!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orleans, ON
Posts: 1,971
Here's also from the Citizen

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Dare
Staff want to begin in east, south
Patrick Dare, The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Thursday, September 11, 2008

The preferred construction plan for the new rapid transit system is to begin by building commuter rail from downtown to the east and south ends.

The city this morning is unveiling four options for the sequence of construction for the $4-billion transit plan.

The best option, according to staff, is to build commuter rail in the transitway corridor from Blair Station to Tunney's Pasture, including the tunnel under downtown, then south to the Riverside South Town Centre.

This project would include a major new element: building an additional bus transitway that would run from Blair Station along Innes Road and then into downtown. That corridor would carry the large volume of riders from the east while the current transitway is converted to commuter rail. It would continue to operate after the rail system is built, especially to accommodate riders going to and from the health sciences campus in Alta Vista.

The east-south project would include rail links to both the Via Rail station and The Ottawa Airport.

The plan is bound to be controversial because it follows the path of much of the former council's commuter-rail plan, which was killed by the new council earlier in this term.

Critics of the old north-south plan said it failed to address the most pressing demands for transit service, which are in the east and the west.

The east-south option is preferred because there are fewer obstacles to the construction. For instance, as part of the plan to go west, city staff have run into a wall with the National Capital Commission's reluctance to allow the commuter-rail line to run along the Ottawa River parkway. If city officials have to explore every possible alternative, that could take years and the federal government's Build Canada funding requires that projects be completed by 2015.

The city is counting on the federal government to pay for one-third of the cost of the project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 4:38 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,243
http://ottawa.ca/residents/public_co.../index_en.html

Rapid Transit Network 2031 - click pic to enlarge (pdf)



Developments since Primary Transit Network established in May 2008.
  • LRT extended to Riverside South
  • Browning Avenue Corridor included
  • Supplementary Transit corridor identified
  • Transit priority corridors included
  • Park and Ride Facilities for Ottawa, iTRANS Consulting Inc

fyi $2 billion in new roads spending, about $4.7 billion on rapid transit network

from the Citizen
Quote:
For Kanata North Councillor Marianne Wilkinson, the new plan is a revival of the old plan, championed by former mayor Bob Chiarelli, bringing commuter rail to thinly populated neighbourhoods in the south when all the riders are in the east and the west.

"They've brought back the train that we turned down," said Ms. Wilkinson.

"But we're growing like crazy in Kanata and Stittsville."
lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 5:09 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,819
Quote:
Transit Plan
City wants to begin transit line in east and south

Patrick Dare
The Ottawa Citizen


Thursday, September 11, 2008


OTTAWA - The City of Ottawa says it could take three years to sort out objections to commuter rail along the Ottawa River Parkway, so the city should consider going ahead with rail service east to Blair Station and south to Riverside South.

The city unveiled four construction scenarios for the ambitious new rapid transit plan, which is now expected to cost $4.7 billion over the next 25 years. Two of the plans run rail east and west, but they are problematic because of concerns from the National Capital Commission about a train corridor running along the Ottawa River. The city's managers say they want to work through the issue with the NCC and can't hurry that consultation process.

But the effect of the delay will be that the east-west service can't be built within the next decade, leaving the city to build its downtown tunnel and then east and south.

For Kanata North Councillor Marianne Wilkinson, the new plan is a revival of the old plan, championed by former mayor Bob Chiarelli, bringing commuter rail to thinly populated neighbourhoods in the south when all the riders are in the east and the west.

"They've brought back the train that we turned down," said Ms. Wilkinson. "But we're growing like crazy in Kanata and Stittsville."

The transit plan is $700 million more expensive than previously reported because the plan is fully costed and includes additional elements such as a streetcar along Carling Avenue, a new bus transitway in the east and creating a bus transitway on Baseline Road.

© The Ottawa Citizen 2008
.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 6:25 PM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cre47 View Post
Ottawa Sun article - seems the east end is more preffered and Jan is fuming. Well Jan blame on the residents of Westboro for that, although if the Strandherd Bridge is built at the same time much of the construction is done, I could see an extension to Barrhaven without worrying about the Westboro NIMBYS.
You mean people who think they live in Westboro now that it has become the cool place to be. Westboro used to end at Rochester Field (and Island Park in the east). People who actually live in Westboro already have a hole in the ground and I would suspect want to see the Transitway converted. It was because of the people of Westboro wanting a transit station closer to them that Westboro Station is where it is and not at Island Park as originally planned. Ditto for the later addition at Dominion. The current objectors/NIMBYs are living in what used to be called McKellar Park and, further west, Woodroffe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 7:33 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,358
Actually, there really hasn't been any real vocal objections (at least not yet) against using part of the Byron corridor from residents of Westboro or communities west of it. The NIMBYism is a largely assumed thing, especially because no serious proposal has been studied. I think the NCC is right to say that options should be explored because the best solution might actually be to use Richmond/Byron even if it would cost more in the long run. Let them pitch in or lobby the feds for the increased cost if they really don't want the Parkway to be touched.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 8:43 PM
Rathgrith's Avatar
Rathgrith Rathgrith is offline
I'm just joking.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,176
Kitchissippi, I like how you cock-blocked Franky on this thread.
Someone needed to do it. However, I still want to know what the each termunis of the tunnel will be near the University of Ottawa. Its needs to be just after the 417 as it heads toward Campus station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 9:02 PM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post
Actually, there really hasn't been any real vocal objections (at least not yet) against using part of the Byron corridor from residents of Westboro or communities west of it. The NIMBYism is a largely assumed thing, especially because no serious proposal has been studied.
That's perfectly true; the objections so far - which is what I was referring to - have been against the Parkway route. The loudest voice against the Byron routing so far has been Alex Cullen, and, for some strange reason, city staff with their outrageous $750M claim.

Quote:
I think the NCC is right to say that options should be explored because the best solution might actually be to use Richmond/Byron even if it would cost more in the long run. Let them pitch in or lobby the feds for the increased cost if they really don't want the Parkway to be touched.
Perfectly in agreement. The NCC are responsible for the otherwise 'best' option - the former CPR corridor - being filled with housing so they ought to pay for their own lack of foresight by anteing up the funds to run it in the Byron corridor. As I've written before, it's not like the NCC didn't know that rapid transit would be running this way because they signed the agreement to allow the Parkway to be used "temporarily".

And since the Byron corridor is shorter and straighter and goes closer to more housing and businesses, its long run cost ought to be lower and its long-run revenues/benefits higher.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 9:14 PM
m0nkyman m0nkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,031
The Byron ROW makes the most sense in terms of available space and routing, as well as station placement. I'm not especially enamored of putting the LRT along the river myself.

Part of me suspects that the parkway option was put forward to make the Byron route the preferred alternative.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 9:21 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
http://ottawa.ca/residents/public_co.../index_en.html

Rapid Transit Network 2031 - click pic to enlarge (pdf)



Developments since Primary Transit Network established in May 2008.
  • LRT extended to Riverside South
  • Browning Avenue Corridor included
  • Supplementary Transit corridor identified
  • Transit priority corridors included
  • Park and Ride Facilities for Ottawa, iTRANS Consulting Inc

fyi $2 billion in new roads spending, about $4.7 billion on rapid transit network

from the Citizen


lol
Meh.

Seems less ambitious than the original plan4...

__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 10:01 PM
Suzie Suzie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post
Actually, there really hasn't been any real vocal objections (at least not yet) against using part of the Byron corridor from residents of Westboro or communities west of it. The NIMBYism is a largely assumed thing, especially because no serious proposal has been studied. I think the NCC is right to say that options should be explored because the best solution might actually be to use Richmond/Byron even if it would cost more in the long run. Let them pitch in or lobby the feds for the increased cost if they really don't want the Parkway to be touched.
I agree that the Richmond/Byron alignment deserves serious consideration, and its costs and benefits should be fully assessed. But is there or will there be grassroots and political support for this option? I have not seen Carlingwood and Ambleside residents pushing for it even though they would be the main beneficiaries. Do you expect Cullen to eventually reverse himself and support it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 10:06 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,358
The Ambleside residents have been begging for a Transitway stop at Old Orchard for the longest time. I think they would be elated if the stop was along Richmond instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 10:08 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
http://ottawa.ca/residents/public_co.../index_en.html

Rapid Transit Network 2031 - click pic to enlarge (pdf)



Developments since Primary Transit Network established in May 2008.
  • LRT extended to Riverside South
  • Browning Avenue Corridor included
  • Supplementary Transit corridor identified
  • Transit priority corridors included
  • Park and Ride Facilities for Ottawa, iTRANS Consulting Inc
I still don't understand how the Innes corridor between Industrial and Blair could become a full blown Transitway type BRT as shown in the diagram. At best, the only thing that could be implemented there is transit priority lanes because of the room availalble.

Also, what is the difference between "Supplementary Transit - Bus" and "Transit Priority"? Aren't they essentially the same?

There are weird errors in that diagram -- Conroy Rd is labeled as Alta Vista, and the Blackburn ByPass is labeled Cumberland, and Industrial is in the wrong place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 10:31 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post

There are weird errors in that diagram -- Conroy Rd is labeled as Alta Vista, and the Blackburn ByPass is labeled Cumberland, and Industrial is in the wrong place.
It's the plan of city staff, instead of changing the rail links, they are renaming the suburbs, less work! So if they said, bring rail to Kanata, it will be done at a cheaper cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 10:57 PM
AuxTown's Avatar
AuxTown AuxTown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,102
Looks like we need to update the maps for Phase 1:

Quote:
Staff Set to Roll Out Transit Options
Josh Pringle
Thursday, September 11, 2008

City Staff will roll out four options today for the implementation of Ottawa's new Rapid Transit Network.

City Council approved the $4 billion, 25 year transit plan back in the spring.

Public consultations will kick off this evening to discuss the light rail network, that will include a downtown transit tunnel.

CTV News reports Staff want Ottawa to build the downtown transit tunnel first, with rail links heading east and south.

The plan would see a Light Rail link built from Blair Road to downtown, and north-south from Bayview to Riverside South, with a link to the Ottawa International Airport.

The Ottawa Sun reports one of the four options will include running light rail to the University of Ottawa from Riverside South, then east to the Blair Road transit station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2008, 11:34 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post
I still don't understand how the Innes corridor between Industrial and Blair could become a full blown Transitway type BRT as shown in the diagram. At best, the only thing that could be implemented there is transit priority lanes because of the room availalble.

Also, what is the difference between "Supplementary Transit - Bus" and "Transit Priority"? Aren't they essentially the same?

There are weird errors in that diagram -- Conroy Rd is labeled as Alta Vista, and the Blackburn ByPass is labeled Cumberland, and Industrial is in the wrong place.
Not really. Supplementary Bus is assumably just a normal bus route. It stops, goes, follows the normal traffic rules.

Transit priority can mean a number of things. The most minimal would be giving transit 'soft control' over traffic lights, which means they could extend a green light to get through the intersection, or shorten a red light. You could go further with traffic signal control and have the buses be able to override the light cycle, much like emergency vehciles can do at some intersections. The next level would be to provide skip lanes, making an intersection an extra lane wide for transit only. Before regular traffic gets to flow, the transit buses would be permitted to pass through the intersection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2008, 1:30 AM
c_speed3108 c_speed3108 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,806
I am thinking the stars are beginning to align for the Byron corridor...and I could not be happier.

The reason I think so are:

1) The NCC seems awfully cool to the parkway idea. This is going to be worse then pulling teeth to build anything there.

2) It seems a number of parties (councilors, newspapers perhaps even city staff) are doing what they can to sink the Carling idea.

At least in the paper it was called "a street car" *gasp* the forbidden word!

They also went to the trouble to mention that it will stop at 30 traffic lights.

I frankly can't think of many ways to create a worse impression of that route. This think makes it sound like you will be luck to get from Kanata to Downtown by noon if you leave at 6AM. Transfers, stop lights, and just general slowness.

Quote:
Streetcars new wrinkle in transit plans

By DEREK PUDDICOMBE, Sun Media


City commuters could end up with a choice of light rail transit or streetcars.

City staff unveiled four transit scenarios today and a possible streetcar line along Carling Ave. has been drawn into the long-range plans by city staff.

The Carling Ave. streetcar would be built into the current roadway and would face about 30 traffic lights along with 30-km stretch of road.

A Carling streetcar is proposed in case the National Capital Commission does not give the city permission to run light rail along the Ottawa River Parkway.

The city operates OC Transpo buses along the parkway with permission from the NCC but it’s been non-committal so far about allowing LRT to operate along the corridor, which is a vital part of the city’s plan to bring light rail to the west end.

Councillors Clive Doucet and Christine Leadman have said all along that the NCC won’t approve use of the parkway and that the city should be considering running street cars along Carling Ave.

They have argued that taking light rail down the parkway will destroy its environmental integrity. They admit the Carling Ave. route isn’t a new idea, but because it’s a major roadway and a clean, straight route with links to the highway, the existing western Transitway, downtown and Quebec via the existing O-Train line, it’s the best way for the city to connect the downtown with the west end.

However, Bay Coun. Alex Cullen, who is also the chairman of the city’s transit committee, said council has already rejected the notion of a streetcar line down Carling.

Cullen said the NCC is asking for an environmental assessment to be completed to investigate all options for light rail to link the west. That would have to include a 5-km stretch of road in Westboro known as the “Byron Strip,” the former route of the old tramcar system.

The Byron Strip, which stretches from about Holland Ave to Richardson Ave, would have to be considered if the NCC doesn’t give its approval to use the parkway.

“We don’t want the Byron Strip,” said Cullen. “But if the (parkway) plan crashes?”

However, Cullen is convinced the NCC will allow light rail to run along the parkway.

The Carling Ave. piece of the $4.7-billion, 23-year transit plan, is among four scenarios unveiled yesterday.

The original $4-billion plan grew by $700 million in three months as the city added pieces like the Carling Ave line and other bus routes that hadn’t yet been costed.

Scenario 3 is shaping up to be the preferred option among councillors which includes taking light rail transit 30 km from Riverside South to the University of Ottawa then another 4 km to the Blair Rd. transit station and west to Tunney’s Pasture.

It also includes a $112-million bus bypass that must be built to maintain commuter service while a portion of the east-end Transitway is converted to light rail.

Staff also seem to like Scenario 3.

“This scenario is clearly easier to get off the ground,” said Nancy Schepers, deputy city manager of planning, transit and the environment.

Council will decide the preferred route in November.

derek.puddicombe@sunmedia.ca
So on that note...Byron it is.


And I have to agree with m0nkyman, that some of the other options were put forward to eat the opposition so that Byron can be left standing. This same approach was taken in certain parts of the transitway. The designer called it "winning room" You need to give people space to feel they have won. Ie in the case of NIMBYs...don't put it in their back yard....put it in their living room instead. Then they turn into NIMLRs (not in my living room). You accept that and move it to their back yard and they walk away satisfied..since they were too busy protesting the living room route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2008, 1:41 AM
c_speed3108 c_speed3108 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,806
The other item I wanted to comment on was the nice little implementation design in the east end. By running buses from Blair to Innes and then along Innes into Industrial to Hurdman, they have basically cleared the deck for construction between Blair and Hurdman (presumably the train part of the station will be built north of the existing bus part).

While that is going on the tunnel work can be going on.

Buses on the west transitway can easily exit just before Tunney's and use Scott and Wellington to get to Lebreton and ultimately downtown. This again clears the deck in the small west end portion.

The only really tricky part left is the U of O to Hurdman stretch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.