HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Arts, Culture & Entertainment


View Poll Results: What do you think?
I love it! 14 53.85%
meh...ban me. 12 46.15%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 9:20 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Question Hastings Park Zoo & North Shore Amusement Park

Certainly wouldn't since NIMBY's would be all over it, and with the lack of vision within our municipal gov'ts.....i've always wanted the Greater Vancouver Zoo to move back to Vancouver, into Hastings Park.

Across the inlet from Hastings Park in the North Shore would be a world-class, Disneyland/Six Flags/Universal Studios-type of amusement park and resort. Why the North Shore? It's still in close proximity to Vancouver.....it's not in Hastings Park because it's too small.

Lets face it, we need attractions in this city....and don't give me the "nature/wilderness/sightseeing" b.s. Fact is, we can have both, though our weather could be a problem for the amusement park especially since it's right at the foot of the mountains (lotza rain).

What do you guys think?


Hastings Park Zoo (about 120 acres)
Hastings Park Racecourse (about 34 acres)
Pacific Coliseum (about 7 acres)
Amusement Park & Resort (450-500 acres)


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 9:36 AM
Nutterbug Nutterbug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,135
1. We don't need an animal prison.

2. We're not Los Angeles, Orlando, Tokyo or Paris. A world class name brand amusement park would be wasted sitting idle here in bad weather half the year.

Whatever's going to happen to the port facilities that'll be displaced by the amusement park anyways?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 9:57 AM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
Cheers!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,869
We need attractions for sure, but I think we're more short of industrial land. For attractions, I'm thinking more of a museum type of deal, which I believe we'll get.

I thought the plan for Hastings Park was for it to be transformed into a... well... park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 1:41 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Quote:
Whatever's going to happen to the port facilities that'll be displaced by the amusement park anyways?
Exactly what I was thinking. There is no way in hell that a friggin amusement park is going to bring in more cash than the port facilities that exist currently. And as someone else noted already Vancouver needs to retain as much industrial land as possible, regardless of how ugly it might be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 3:42 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,001
Toronto has Canada's Wonderland, which is a Cedar Fairs, and Montreal has La Ronde, which is a Six Flags. They sit idle for the greater part of the year. Why can't Vancouver have something better than the mediocre Playland??? I think you've presented a good idea here. Maybe the location is wrong, but the notion that Vancouver could use something more on the amusement park front is a very good point. We don't just find amusement parks in Los Angeles, Paris, Orlando, or Tokyo. We don't necessarily have to build something on a Disneyland scale here. Much more land would be required for that. There are great parks on a smaller scale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 7:45 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreambrother808 View Post
Toronto has Canada's Wonderland, which is a Cedar Fairs, and Montreal has La Ronde, which is a Six Flags. They sit idle for the greater part of the year. Why can't Vancouver have something better than the mediocre Playland??? I think you've presented a good idea here. Maybe the location is wrong, but the notion that Vancouver could use something more on the amusement park front is a very good point. We don't just find amusement parks in Los Angeles, Paris, Orlando, or Tokyo. We don't necessarily have to build something on a Disneyland scale here. Much more land would be required for that. There are great parks on a smaller scale.
Agreed. Playland is just meh now... nothing has changed over the years. I would prefer the next Amusement Park (Playland v2?) be somewhere close to a SkyTrain station =)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 8:15 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
The port facilities, and eventually every port facility in Burrard Inlet, would move to a new superport in Tsawwassen.

We already have an "animal prison"....it's called the Greater Vancouver Zoo, currently in the middle of nowhere. If it moved into the city, I'm sure it'll attract quite a few more customers. As well, I believe that many of the zoo's animals are rescued and are not able to be returned to the wild.


We need attractions, and certainly not just museums.


Hastings Park may be a park, but who the hell uses it as a park? It's hardly this so-called "Stanley Park of the east", and it sure was a huge mistake to tear down all of those fair buildings to replace it with a frickin pond. Most of the year, there's barely anyone there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 9:00 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Quote:
The port facilities, and eventually every port facility in Burrard Inlet, would move to a new superport in Tsawwassen.
That's not going to happen anytime soon. Not only would that pose vast political
issues but environmental ones as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 9:09 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,380
^We're going to have both. The port is Vancouver in many respects, and forfeiting one of the world's great natural harbours for a mud flat is insane.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 9:15 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
seattle has 6 flags and it sits closed a big chunk of the year

its only viable in the warm weather

would be a big waste of working land

as for a zoo - kind of politically incorrect these days
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 10:25 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreambrother808 View Post
Toronto has Canada's Wonderland, which is a Cedar Fairs, and Montreal has La Ronde, which is a Six Flags. They sit idle for the greater part of the year. Why can't Vancouver have something better than the mediocre Playland??? I think you've presented a good idea here. Maybe the location is wrong, but the notion that Vancouver could use something more on the amusement park front is a very good point. We don't just find amusement parks in Los Angeles, Paris, Orlando, or Tokyo. We don't necessarily have to build something on a Disneyland scale here. Much more land would be required for that. There are great parks on a smaller scale.
Well, i guess i'm thinking more along the lines of Alton Towers in the U.K. An amusement park in a forest, with no ride being taller than the tree line. A lot of its rides run underground and in landscaped ditches. But of course, it would take awhile for our trees to grow...add in a resort hotel to the park.
























Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 10:32 PM
Nutterbug Nutterbug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
The port facilities, and eventually every port facility in Burrard Inlet, would move to a new superport in Tsawwassen.
That's an awful lot of port facilities to cram onto one small man-made island or floating dock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
We already have an "animal prison"....it's called the Greater Vancouver Zoo, currently in the middle of nowhere. If it moved into the city, I'm sure it'll attract quite a few more customers. As well, I believe that many of the zoo's animals are rescued and are not able to be returned to the wild.
Then it should be out in the valley somewhere, where they can afford the animals lots of land and space to move around.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 11:12 PM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
Cheers!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
Agreed. Playland is just meh now... nothing has changed over the years. I would prefer the next Amusement Park (Playland v2?) be somewhere close to a SkyTrain station =)
Meh. I haven't been there since I was 10 or so. I hear it gets packed with people. It could easily expand to at least what it once was. Too bad it doesn't run for very long.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 11:39 PM
Nutterbug Nutterbug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
seattle has 6 flags and it sits closed a big chunk of the year

its only viable in the warm weather

would be a big waste of working land
Don't raise kids north of the 40 degree line

OR

Don't raise them to exquisite standards of fun.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2008, 11:52 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
as it is playland charges really high prices to make up for the short season

watching KTLA you can get seasons passes for like $59.99 to some of the parks down there
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2008, 12:30 AM
Hourglass Hourglass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 754
Winter weather in Paris or Tokyo isn't exactly tropical, so I don't see why Vancouver couldn't have an attraction of that sort. I would question whether Van could support an attraction of this sort, though.

Anyway, Lynnterm, the North Shore port facilities you're showing, isn't going anywhere soon. I understand there have been discussions to add container-handling facilities to expand the port's overall container capacity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2008, 12:35 AM
Nutterbug Nutterbug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hourglass View Post
Winter weather in Paris or Tokyo isn't exactly tropical, so I don't see why Vancouver couldn't have an attraction of that sort.
I guess they make up for it in population.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2008, 3:14 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
they should pretty playland up and add a water slide park

there aren't many that close to the city - they are all a good distance away
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2008, 4:03 AM
leftside leftside is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 415
Alton Towers is pretty naff. I'd love a Six Flags near to Vancouver!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2008, 3:06 AM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,026
Why does it have to be in Vancouver. Most of these parks are built way outside the city limits. Aldergrove would be a good fit.

Even Disneyland is built in Orange County, which at the time was farmland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Arts, Culture & Entertainment
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.