Quote:
Originally Posted by invisibleairwaves
^I disagree. Langley was way ahead of Surrey on widening Fraser Highway and 64th Avenue, and while it's certainly not ideal, I'll gladly take the 200th St. interchange over the 176th St. deathtrap. I agree about 200th/Hwy 10, though, and 208th could certainly use some work. Overall, though, I'd say Langley's much better at roadwork.
Of course, Langley's residents make up for it by making Surrey drivers look competent (a true feat in itself).
|
200 Avenue interchange is awful. It's already at capacity, and traffic queuing for the lights in the AM peak often can come close to reaching Highway 1 through lanes.
216 will be built eventually, but even in the current Gateway plan, there's no plan for that (I've seen the updated drawings - even 192 Street is going to remain the same at this time, but when development warrants, the province and the City of Surrey agree that it will be constructed as a full-flow interchange at that time (with 192 Street being the location of the bridge, and the connection to Harvie Road will be lost)
176 Street will finally be a Parclo A4. Don't know what that is? It's probably the most efficient form of interchange present (only wish 200 Street was constructed like this).
All traffic entering the freeway exits to the right. All traffic leaving the freeway must turn left or right to access the local road.
Highly efficient in their location.