HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1261  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2006, 7:58 AM
jazfingr's Avatar
jazfingr jazfingr is offline
need input!!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 373
One Las Vegas looks cheap and ugly, IMHO. It resembles the low cost housing projects that went up in large cities in the 60's. Retro, yes, but not the right retro. I don't know what the developers were thinking Too bad their building five of them.
__________________
My labor of love VegasTodayAndTomorrow
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1262  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2006, 9:40 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
They aren't using any different materials that other condo projects are using. From Turnberry to ONE it's all that cheap GFRC and EIFS crap. Still, I think you're really exaggerating about it looking like a housing project.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1263  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2006, 4:20 PM
mdiederi's Avatar
mdiederi mdiederi is offline
4
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: JT
Posts: 4,933
Not quite as bad as that new Hilton building next door to Sky, but almost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1264  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2006, 4:25 PM
mdiederi's Avatar
mdiederi mdiederi is offline
4
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: JT
Posts: 4,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by highriseLV View Post
W Las Vegas in Trouble?

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_ho.../11390644.html


Dec. 15, 2006
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

W developer to consider options
Kind of smells like trouble ... or at least a delay.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1265  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2006, 9:09 PM
future29 future29 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 82
if Sullivan square were to be built in downtown LV or on the 61 acres it would be a perfect fit. too bad none of the downtown developers have the foresight to plan something similar.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1266  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2006, 5:58 AM
ScottG ScottG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 802
has anyone seen the new las vegas tower diagram? its extremely well done, even the base has detail.....and it is from a 'phantom' illustrator...'SBROS' i checked his other diagrams...and vegas tower is the one he has done...

didnt vegasrain say he herd the developers were unsatisfied with his diagram? maybe they made there own.....good advertisement no?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1267  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2006, 6:39 AM
mdiederi's Avatar
mdiederi mdiederi is offline
4
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: JT
Posts: 4,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottG View Post
'phantom' illustrator...'SBROS'
He owns the ad agency handling LVT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1268  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2006, 10:48 PM
Vtown420 Vtown420 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt. Charleston, NV
Posts: 513
More NIMBYs against the Las Vegas Tower, this time it’s the Las Vegas Sun. Perhaps we should all write the paper with reasons why it should be built, and how the airport should work around the skyline and stop holding back progress.


December 13, 2006

Editorial: Safe airport vs. tall obelisk

Strip tower 739 feet taller than the Stratosphere would pose a threat to airport safety


Twelve years after a heated controversy over the height of the Stratosphere tower near Sahara Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard, another proposal has come along for an even higher tower, one that would be the second-tallest building in the world if approved.

Texas developer Christopher Milam is proposing a tower somewhat resembling the Washington Monument for an area just south of the Sahara Hotel, at the site of a former water park. While the Washington Monument stands at just more than 555 feet, Milam's casino tower would stand more than three times as high, coming in at a staggering 1,888 feet.

When Clark County Aviation Director Randy Walker told Las Vegas Sun reporter Liz Benston that Milam's proposed tower would be a danger to aircraft, it brought back memories of the fight in 1994 over the Stratosphere.

This tower was originally approved in 1990 at 1,012 feet. But the Las Vegas Planning Commission in April 1994 approved a request to add another 813 feet. This set off a battle that pitted the city against Clark County, the Federal Aviation Administration, Nellis Air Force Base and the Las Vegas Convention and Visitor's Authority.

Those arrayed against the new height of the Stratosphere argued that to guard against the danger of collisions with the tower, flight patterns would have to be radically adjusted, risking safety. The convention authority also argued that those adjustments would delay departures and arrivals at McCarran International Airport, costing airlines tens of millions of dollars - money that would be passed on to passengers, risking a loss in tourism.

Ultimately, the Stratosphere was approved at 1,149 feet, a height that quieted criticism but that was still considered unwise by aviation officials.

The Clark County Commission will review Milam's plan in March. Given the county's strong opposition to the Stratosphere's extended height 12 years ago, we anticipate that it will have little chance of approval.

Nevertheless, there are sure to be arguments for it, leading quite possibly to another prolonged controversy. Milam says he sees his proposed development as bringing forth an "iconic building" for Las Vegas. In our view, Las Vegas needs a safe airport more than it needs this iconic building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1269  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 2:13 AM
sky-of-webs's Avatar
sky-of-webs sky-of-webs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: las vegas
Posts: 56
You would think that the county planning commision document and any subsequent reports (news agents) would have seen the renderings and not refer The Las Vegas Tower to an obelisk. There is no resemblance between the two.
Of course it does say editorial. Was this a reader response or staff writer? If it was a reader please post their name so we can tell if it is someone with an agenda or just a person pointing out history.
And again, 12 years ago 330' ish was the topout on the strip, things have changed drastically since then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1270  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 2:37 AM
Vtown420 Vtown420 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt. Charleston, NV
Posts: 513
Sorry, I forgot to post the link. It doesn't say who wrote it.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/st...566654825.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1271  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 5:13 PM
mdiederi's Avatar
mdiederi mdiederi is offline
4
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: JT
Posts: 4,933
Palms Place
(the sky is gray because it was snowing this morning).











Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1272  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 9:36 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,406
Snow in Vegas?
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1273  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 9:39 PM
PuyoPiyo's Avatar
PuyoPiyo PuyoPiyo is offline
Puyo!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 627
^ Yupp during the winter time, but very little snow.
__________________
Colorful Past, Bright Future.
My Diagram =====>> http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m21438
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1274  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2006, 12:35 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Patrick Patrick is offline
Desert Dweller
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,611
Wow, Palms Place came out of nowhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1275  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 1:15 AM
Vegas Grows Up Vegas Grows Up is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 137
New City Center Pic

I took this pic from the 8th floor of Panorama Towers on December 19th

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1276  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 2:06 AM
ScottG ScottG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 802
ok vegas has ALMOST every color now.....

i beleive i see green glass on palms place..wich if you go to VTAT you can see a new model of palms place...looks all blue now

so vegas needs some red glass. and SILVER i want SILVER! W and pinnacle can close this deal!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1277  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 4:20 AM
BruceH's Avatar
BruceH BruceH is offline
LuxuryRealtyGroup.com
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 123
Cool Sullivan Square

Sullivan Square is a great project and while it's pricey per sq foot, its concept and architecture is bang on. It's funded too!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1278  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 4:24 AM
BruceH's Avatar
BruceH BruceH is offline
LuxuryRealtyGroup.com
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 123
Cool W Las Vegas

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdiederi View Post
Kind of smells like trouble ... or at least a delay.
News about W's status is coming soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1279  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 7:40 AM
Daquan13 Daquan13 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East Boston, MA. USA
Posts: 7,746
Question is, can or will it be built?

Several proposals or designs have either been put on the back burner or they were scrubbed altogether.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1280  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2006, 8:54 AM
peltecs peltecs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 10
Citycenter / Cosmopolitan Construction video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz4h8ubY1EM

Amazing the guy taking the video didn't fall into the big hole.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:05 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.