HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Arts, Culture, Dining, Recreation & Entertainment


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2007, 8:37 PM
Ronin's Avatar
Ronin Ronin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: District B13
Posts: 1,271
Wasn't UO accused recently of fielding "The best team money can buy?" (albeit that was for the football team)

I'm sure Phil Knight would be more than happy to foot some of the bill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2007, 3:28 AM
oilcan's Avatar
oilcan oilcan is offline
Tokyo 1993 - 1998
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
Wasn't UO accused recently of fielding "The best team money can buy?" (albeit that was for the football team)

I'm sure Phil Knight would be more than happy to foot some of the bill.
Examples like outside funding for a Joey Harrington Heisman billboard in New York and the NCAA's best locker room at Autzen Stadium might suggest that to a certain degree but, the Ducks record in football since 2001 destroys any realistic truth to that.. USC, WSU alone in the conference since 2001 have had much better success on the field.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2007, 3:28 AM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
^^^^
This arena won't be built without Phil Knight's $$$$
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2007, 12:09 AM
360Rich 360Rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vantucky
Posts: 256
New pictures and video





A 3 minute video as well at

http://www.goducks.com/ViewArticle.d...&ATCLID=876547

Kilkenny emphasized that the model, which also includes a practice court as well as other amenities, is an example of what the proposed arena could look like and that no definitive decisions have been made.

Last edited by 360Rich; Apr 30, 2007 at 4:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2007, 1:32 AM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
looks good! I can't wait to see it built, although it will be hard to replace the pit
go ducks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2007, 5:09 AM
WestCoast's Avatar
WestCoast WestCoast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 547
outside looks ugly and doesn't seem to fit in well with the rest of the campus.

really though, who cares, build the thing!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2007, 2:19 PM
Chicago3rd Chicago3rd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cranston, Rhode Island
Posts: 8,695
Save Mac Court! No new areana.

Backwater...that is a term associated normally with hillbillies and conservatives and Eugene is almost Marxist.......so that is an ignorant observation about Euguen.

That being said...many parts of Oregon, rural, are quite similar to West Virginia...economicially depressed.
__________________
All the photos "I" post are photos taken by me and can be found on my photo pages @ http://wilbsnodgrassiii.smugmug.com// UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED and CREDITED.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted May 1, 2007, 8:04 AM
northface's Avatar
northface northface is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: seattle area
Posts: 2,503
hmm...its okay...
__________________
GO HUSKIES!
H-U-S-K-I-E-S!
BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2007, 3:00 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,520
HOLY CRAP!

Knight gift to UO draws gasps
Donation - The Nike co-founder pledges $100 million to Oregon's athletic department, the largest to a university in the state
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
RACHEL BACHMAN
The Oregonian

EUGENE -- Phil Knight, Nike co-founder and an ardent alumnus of the University of Oregon, and his wife, Penny, have pledged $100 million to Oregon's athletic department, the largest gift of any kind to a university in Oregon.

The donation, announced Monday in a news conference at the university's Casanova Center, will form an athletic endowment whose ultimate goal is to sustain Oregon's athletic department in perpetuity. In the short term, it will jump-start the university's stalled campaign to build a $180 million basketball arena to replace 81-year-old McArthur Court.

"This extraordinary gift, which it's hard to find words to describe, allows the University of Oregon and its athletic department to reach for new heights otherwise unthinkable," said university President Dave Frohnmayer.

Knight, 69, did not attend the news conference. Through a Nike spokesman, he declined comment.

Knight revealed the donation Saturday to about 100 Oregon donors he had invited to the Nike campus near Beaverton, and his guests gasped when they heard the news, Frohnmayer said. Pat Kilkenny, the former Oregon booster who was hired as Oregon's athletic director this year, recalled the moment with awe.

"Not to be sacrilegious, but it was almost spiritual," Kilkenny said.

Knight's legacy is entwined with that of the University of Oregon, where he earned a bachelor's degree in business administration in 1959 and ran for legendary track coach Bill Bowerman, co-founder of what would become Nike.

Knight has donated an estimated $200 million to Oregon, including money for renovation of Autzen Stadium, endowed chairs, financing for construction of a law building and a renovation of Oregon's main library. Including Monday's donation, about three-fourths of that amount has gone to athletics.

Nathan Tublitz, a UO biology professor and critic of UO's athletic spending, said he was disappointed with the nature of the donation, which comes on the heels of more than $100 million in spending on Oregon athletic facilities in the past 10 years.

"The priorities of the university are totally out of whack when so much money can go to an ancillary activity of the university when the rest of the university goes begging," said Tublitz, who also is co-chairman of a national academic reform group, the Coalition on Intercollegiate Athletics.

Frohnmayer said the direction of the donation was Knight's decision, and that the majority of construction projects in the past 10 years have been for academics.

Knight stepped down as Nike CEO in 2004 but maintains an active role in the company. He sold $1 billion of Nike stock in 2005, and he has just begun to part with it.

Last year he gave $105 million, his largest gift, to the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where he earned a master's in business administration.

After Knight's donation, Oregon needs an additional $50 million -- $20 million of which has been pledged -- to break ground on a basketball arena, said Jim Bartko, a senior associate athletic director who has been the department's liaison to Knight.

Dennis Howard, the Philip H. Knight Professor of Business at the University of Oregon, who has studied donor behavior in college athletics, said Knight's gift is tied for the second-largest ever given to a collegiate athletic department.

Last year, hedge-fund chairman T. Boone Pickens gave $165 million to Oklahoma State University to renovate the football stadium that bears his name and to launch a fund-raising campaign for a 100-acre sports complex. In 1998, casino owner Ralph Engelstad, a former University of North Dakota goalie, gave $100 million to build a hockey arena for his alma mater that now bears his name.

"Most of these legacy gifts don't go to athletic programs," Howard said. "They typically go in support of more traditional academic programs."

Knight's donation is by far the largest to an Oregon university.

Among recent donations in the state, Lois Bates Acheson donated $21 million to Oregon State University's College of Veterinary Medicine, the school announced in 2005. Acheson, a 1937 OSU graduate, and her husband, Robert, owned a regional trucking company and later started Black Ball Transport, a ferry service that operates between Port Angeles, Wash., and Victoria, B.C.

Portland State received its largest donation, $8 million, in 2004 from alumnus Fariborz Maseeh to the College of Engineering and Computer Science.

Brian Meehan and Brent Hunsberger of The Oregonian contributed to this report.
http://www.oregonlive.com/oregonian/...150.xml&coll=7
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2007, 3:12 AM
NJD's Avatar
NJD NJD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 632
posted 2-28-07

Quote:
This arena won't be built without Phil Knight's $$$$
nice prediction 65MAX
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2007, 4:08 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
The priorities of the university are totally out of whack
I don't understand, wasn't this a private venture by Knight NOT the University of Oregon? Here at Oklahoma State, we deal with the same criticism about Boone Pickens. Hate to break it to them, but acedemics WILL follow behind a notable athtletics program. Good players WILL go to top notch facilities.... end of story. I can't wait until the day Oklahoma State gets more in the spotlight as will the U of O. Our resumes will go that much further for us. Even if you're not an athletics kind of person, you should still understand the positive outcome that will occur. Just to prove a point, when Boone Pickens donated the $ to Ok State University, they pointed to the U of O as a positive outcome (their football program)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2007, 11:30 PM
Drew-Ski's Avatar
Drew-Ski Drew-Ski is offline
Green Giant
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: pdx-phx-pdx
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
HOLY CRAP!

Knight gift to UO draws gasps
Donation - The Nike co-founder pledges $100 million to Oregon's athletic department, the largest to a university in the state
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
RACHEL BACHMAN
The Oregonian

EUGENE -- Phil Knight, Nike co-founder and an ardent alumnus of the University of Oregon, and his wife, Penny, have pledged $100 million to Oregon's athletic department, the largest gift of any kind to a university in Oregon.

Nathan Tublitz, a UO biology professor and critic of UO's athletic spending, said he was disappointed with the nature of the donation, which comes on the heels of more than $100 million in spending on Oregon athletic facilities in the past 10 years.

"The priorities of the university are totally out of whack when so much money can go to an ancillary activity of the university when the rest of the university goes begging," said Tublitz, who also is co-chairman of a national academic reform group, the Coalition on Intercollegiate Athletics.

Brian Meehan and Brent Hunsberger of The Oregonian contributed to this report.
http://www.oregonlive.com/oregonian/...150.xml&coll=7

I find the arguments of Nathan Tublitz compelling....but , Its Phil Knight's money and he can do with it what he wants.
__________________
Save the Environment
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2007, 2:56 PM
Rhome's Avatar
Rhome Rhome is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 80
I'm just going to assume that Phil Knight is giving where his passions are. In Aug. 2006, he donated $105 toward the new Stanford Biz School campus -- he graduated from there with MBA in '62. Give the guy a break, I'm sure he's not through giving.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2007, 9:39 PM
360Rich 360Rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vantucky
Posts: 256
Prices, fees for new UO arena cited in report

At least 60 percent of the 12,500 seats will be reserved for donors; Oregon students would get 1,900

Tuesday, December 18, 2007
RACHEL BACHMAN
The Oregonian

A report released Monday offered the first glimpse at ticket prices for the University of Oregon's planned $200 million basketball arena, revealing that at least 60 percent of the 12,500 seats will be reserved for annual or one-time donors.

The report, issued by consulting firm CSL International, says annual ticket prices will range from $270 to $360 for an upper-bowl, general-admission seat to $1,600 to $2,000 for a reserved, lower-bowl seat that includes a mandatory annual donation.

University officials released the report just after 5 p.m. Monday. No one authorized to speak about it was available for comment.

Most of the arena's seats also would require a one-time construction fee, which the report says might be payable over three years, of $500 to $25,000 depending on seat location.

Each of 44 courtside seats would go for an average of $4,700 to $8,600 annually plus a construction fee of $50,000 to $100,000.

In all, at least 7,800 seats would go to annual donors or those who had paid a construction fee. Only about 1,600 seats would be available for general admission -- all in the arena's upper bowl -- and 1,900 for Oregon students.

Monday's report is the latest step in Oregon's quest to replace 81-year-old McArthur Court. University officials are racing to prepare materials that would persuade the Oregon Legislature in February to approve Oregon's use of $200 million in state-backed bonds to build the arena. Oregon officials hope to break ground next spring and open the arena in 2010.

The report's projections of ticket prices and donation levels are based on recent surveys of 1,334 Oregon donors and basketball and football ticket-holders, and Eugene and Portland corporations. Oregon's athletic department supplemented those surveys with an online survey of 1,537 members of the general public.

The report says Oregon faces "challenges and limitations with respect to the size of the local market, its buying power and its corporate base."

It shows that the 30-mile radius around the university has the ninth-ranked population in the Pacific-10 Conference, ahead of Washington State, and the seventh-ranked median household income. The Eugene area's "corporate inventory," defined as companies with at least 25 employees and $5 million in annual revenues, ranked eighth.

In 2006, Mac Court played host to 75 events and generated about $2.5 million after expenses. The report estimates a new arena could attract 65 to 100 events, including everything from sports competitions to concerts.

The report, compiled in 2010 dollars to reflect inflation, also offered the latest revenue projection for the arena: $9.6 million to $15.6 million in its first year.

That estimate is higher than CSL's 2003 report, which was $4 million to $7 million in 2006 dollars, and a university estimate from November of $8 million to $14 million.

Oregon's plan is to finance the arena by securing 40-year bonds for a total annual debt-service payment of $11.25 million.

http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/ore...390.xml&coll=7
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2007, 6:58 AM
Pavlov's Dog Pavlov's Dog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 356
They'd might as well keep Mac Court if the students are going to get the squeeze. Frankly I don't know why all the rich cats want to go to an arena to root for the school team when there are no students there. Wealthy people tend to be quiet and sit on their hands. The atmosphere is half the point of going to a sporting event. You can't buy atmosphere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2007, 4:35 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,520
^^^is that normal? Construction fees, $270 a ticket in the upper bowl...what the hell?
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2007, 10:10 PM
360Rich 360Rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vantucky
Posts: 256
The numbers sure don't look very promising to me....

Arena could thrive with proper management, study says

By Diane Dietz The Register-Guard

Published: December 19, 2007 02:00PM

Eugene is a pretty small town to support a major multipurpose university-owned arena, but with aggressive management, such a community edifice might succeed here, according to a feasibility study commissioned by the University of Oregon Athletic Department.

The arena would need aggressive sponsorships, an aggressive nonsports entertainment lineup and generous contributions from premium seat and season ticket holders to cover its costs, according to the report.

The analysis is another step along the way for the UO toward its long-held goal of building a new basketball arena along Franklin Boulevard in Eugene to replace the historic McArthur Court.

Alongside other Pac-10 cities with arenas, Eugene is comparatively puny in measures of market strength, according to the report:

The Eugene market’s population is 340,613, compared with a median population of 3.7 million in other Pac-10 markets.

Eugene residents are older, at 36.9 years, compared with a median of 35.8 in other Pac-10 cities.

Local residents have less to spend, with a median household income of $38,000, compared with $44,000 in other Pac-10 cities.

But what Eugene lacks in numbers, it makes up in enthusiasm, said Dave Sparks, UO Athletic Department accountant on the project.

“This is the major show in town,” he said, “and this community is very supportive of the University of Oregon Athletic Department. We’re probably disproportionately supportive as a community.”

The UO’s plan is to borrow $200 million to build the arena, seek to have revenue from the arena cover all operating costs and as much of the debt costs as possible, and then, if need be, use money from donors to cover the balance of annual debt service.

Under the report’s conservative scenario, the facility would need a donor subsidy of about $2 million a year to help cover the debt payments. Under the aggressive scenario, the facility would be able to cover all its operating and debt costs and would generate a surplus of about $4 million a year, the report said.

Dallas-based consultants Conventions Sports & Leisure based its break-even arena budget on the facility hosting as many as 28 concerts or family shows per year, in addition to 46 athletic events.

While McArthur Court can seat about 9,100 people, the proposed arena’s seating capacity of 12,500 would allow more than twice the ticket sales and a larger potential gross than any venue in Eugene-Springfield.

But it also offers a larger potential for loss, promoters say, and that will limit the number of shows that could be staged at a Eugene arena. Unnamed promoters interviewed by the consultants weren’t encouraging: They cited Eugene’s “relatively low population base” and lack of a track record for arena-scale events to explain their reluctance.

It’s difficult, in fact, to rally 2,500 concert-goers to fill the Hult Center’s main auditorium, said Jim Ralph, promoter and executive director of The Shedd.

Pop acts don’t draw like promoters expect, Ralph said. “The Hult Center has tried to target that audience, and they’re not doing it.”

In Ralph’s estimation, drawing an arena-sized crowd in Eugene two or three times a month all year isn’t possible. He books acts into The Shedd as well as into the Hult Center.

“In Portland, you’ve got a vastly bigger top-end potential for your concert, and generally your expenses are lower because flying in and out is so easy. Why come to Eugene when you can present in Portland?” he said.

Promoter Kit Kesey, who books the McDonald Theatre and the Cuthbert Amphitheater in Eugene, said 70 percent of the acts he narrowly loses in bidding wars he loses to Oregon’s biggest city.

“Portland is sitting up there with seven or eight times our population base when you really go into the sprawl. It’s less of a risk to put that size of show into a bigger city,” he said.

Another difficulty: Eugene audiences run out of concert dollars. Book too many similar acts in a row, Kesey said, and they compete with each other.

“You’re talking about entertainment dollars: how much there is and how far you’re going to spread it out,” Kesey said. “It gets segmented up pretty quickly.”

The Athletic Department also may have a tough time finding promoters willing to risk booking acts in such a large space, Kesey said.

“Eugene is a difficult town and a fickle town to come do concerts in,” Kesey added. “It’s borderline too small. Most of the promoters — and there’s only six in the Northwest — have been bit in Eugene.”

Kesey added that he’s a basketball fan with season tickets who supports the concept of a new arena for Eugene. “The university has all the power in the world, and they can pull anything off that they set their mind to, but from the view point of the industry, it would be a tough call,” he said.

Eugene’s most direct competitor when it comes to staging big events is the Rose Garden in Portland, which is home to the Trail Blazers, according to the feasibility study.

But a UO arena would have one advantage, said Laura Niles, city of Eugene cultural services director. The Rose Garden is a business, she said.

“It’s professional basketball; it’s not college. I see that as a very different model. My guess is if it’s a bad year, the university isn’t going to close it down. They have other ways to accommodate a low year.”

Ralph wondered if the Athletic Department was serious about attracting as many as 28 shows a year.

“I kind of suspect when they say they’re going to do shows there, it’s just a part of their prospectus,” he said. “I would be surprised if they made it an active part of what they’re going to do because it’s so hard to accomplish.”

Sparks of the UO said the concerts — although forecast to bring in as much as $1 million a year — are really negligible in terms of the financial package.

Does the university need the concert revenues?

“I’m reluctant to say ‘No’ because we want to maximize our revenue stream,” Sparks said. “That means we would have to sell more hot dogs if we don’t get that. To say we don’t need it would be an incorrect conclusion. We want to capitalize on every advantage this new arena would provide us.”

http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms...22&sid=1&fid=1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 11:12 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,520
Oregonian editorial

Tipoff time, with an assist from Salem
As long as Phil Knight stands between taxpayers and a UO arena, legislators should OK bonds for the project
Saturday, January 05, 2008
The Oregonian

W hen the University of Oregon's beloved McArthur Court opened in 1926, men's basketball was still just a game and women had to wait 50 more years for their own real team.

This arena is old, people. Older than television, older than the Great Depression, four generations older than the students who play in it. It needs to be replaced, and the Legislature should approve the bonds necessary for a new one.

The project itself has risk, but the risk to taxpayers is relatively low: The University of Oregon will rely on private donations to cover any shortfalls. Just as important, university officials know not to provoke the vindictive fury of legislators by asking for a sports-related bailout down the road.

Next month, arena backers will ask the Legislature to approve state-backed bonds for a $200 million arena to replace Mac Court. They'll describe the existing arena in all of its old-school glory, from the support beams that block views to the ultra-narrow seats designed before the invention of concession stands. They'll insist the new arena will be built to last.

"This thing's gotta last 80 years," university President Dave Frohnmayer said earlier this week.

University officials also will try to dazzle legislators with financial projections that support their cause. They'll stress that the revenue from ticket holders will cover the debt payments. They'll depict the new arena as self-sustaining through extra money from more seats and happier donors.

Legislators will wonder whether this is a sales job. As a general rule, it's safe to assume the numbers for any sports-related construction project are somewhere between accurate and too rosy. However, two entities help shield taxpayers from unrealistic projections and unforeseen events.

First are Ducks football fans who pump money into the Duck Athletic Fund. Their donations will subsidize basketball if necessary.

Second is Nike co-founder and UO alum Phil Knight, who pledged $100 million to a quasi-endowment fund that covers Ducks athletics. Money from this endowment can help fill gaps in the athletic department's operating budget if needed. As soon as the university has this money in the bank or under an airtight contract, legislators can feel comfortable proceeding.

Mac Court was a state-of-the-art facility once -- shortly after the era of peach baskets and hoop skirts. Today, it's worn out. The University of Oregon will benefit from a better venue for basketball and volleyball, not to mention for convocations and concerts. Eugene's economy will benefit as well. A well-timed assist from the Legislature can make this happen.

http://www.oregonlive.com/editorials...280.xml&coll=7
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 3:25 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
i love mac court
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 4:10 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,520


Legislature could consider UO hoops arena in 2008

The Joint Ways and Means Committee today will decide whether to push the $200 million project forward
Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Thursday, January 17, 2008
BY LIBBY TUCKER

The Oregon Legislature’s Joint Committee on Ways and Means today will decide whether the full Legislature later this year will consider a $200 million basketball arena proposed for the University of Oregon, and builders anxiously await the committee’s decision.

“For us that’s very much on the radar, yet where’s the funding really going to land?” Nathan Gibson, a spokesman for Skanska USA, said. “How are we going to pass a bond? There’s quite a bit happening there right now, and it sure would be great to get a new stadium down there.”

The Oregon Board of Higher Education last year asked the Legislature to approve construction of the 380,000-square-foot arena. The state has already provided a $27.4 million bond to buy land for the project.

The board now seeks approval of a $200 million state bond to finance construction. Debt service on the bond would be paid entirely by the university.

“The U of O arena would be the largest (project) in the university’s history,” Bob Simonton, director of capital construction with the Oregon University System, said. “We’ve had stadium projects in the $100 million range, but not something that big.”

Private donors have promised more than $107 million to establish a new “legacy fund” for the university’s athletic department, but that promise is contingent on the university building the arena.

The state’s Legislative Fiscal Office says interest income from the fund and income from ticket sales at the new arena would be enough to cover the bond’s $22.5 million annual debt service.

If the Joint Ways and Means Committee today OKs a vote on the project, the bill will be forwarded to the full state Legislature in February. The project would then go back to the state Board of Higher Education for final approval.

“I think it will definitely be considered in the (Legislature’s) short session,” Sen. Kurt Schrader (D-Canby), a co-chairman of the Joint Ways and Means Committee, said Wednesday. “I like the idea of taking athletics off the taxpayers’ dime, and the university agrees with this. Second, I’d like to reward the creativity of coming up with private funds and managing ticket sales.”
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...oday-will-deci
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Arts, Culture, Dining, Recreation & Entertainment
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.