HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Toronto


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2012, 12:23 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,595
Island life coming to Humber?

Quote:

Island life coming to Humber?



The earth dug out for the Eglinton light rail transit line could be turned into islands in Lake Ontario.

At least that’s one proposal as the city considers ways to improve the water quality off some of Toronto’s Lake Ontario beaches.

The string of islands would go in at the mouth of the Humber River and extend about one kilometre from shore. The plan would take clean fill from construction jobs to build a solid earth barrier underwater that would deflect polluted Humber River water out into the lake and away from Sunnyside Beach.

Above the water, the feature would look like a string of small islands that could be landscaped, support wildlife and made accessible to the public, city councillors on the public works committee were told Tuesday.

thestar.com
Paul Moloney
http://www.thestar.com/news/transpor...ming-to-humber
would certainly be interesting..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2012, 12:36 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
That's a pretty awesome idea.

I wonder if they could also build like a form of a delta for the Humber, as the vegetation in a delta helps filter water. Interesting...
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2012, 7:29 AM
BIMBAM's Avatar
BIMBAM BIMBAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 545
You should definitely do this. When we built the metro in Montreal, we used the earth to build Ile Ste. Helene where we hosted Expo 67. It's huge, home to an amusement park, festival grounds a metro station and extensive parks. It worked out great for us and in land hungry Toronto I bet this would work even better. I think it would be a better sell, however, to build it as one big island, build a bridge, and give it a human use rather than let it go to nature. Better chances of it getting funding, and in such a prime location I'm sure the people of Toronto could find a very unique purpose for it, possibly even an iconic one that could help define the city in the way that liberty island's strategic location and use defines New York and its skyline.

Check out Ile Ste. Helene on google maps, it'll amaze you knowing that it didn't exist just a few decades ago. Perhaps this theoretical island could even be expanded with further subway excavations to produce even more valuable lake front property. With PPP perhaps this idea could even help fund the transit expansions themselves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2012, 4:25 PM
telyou's Avatar
telyou telyou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mafialand aka Montreal
Posts: 255
Well Toronto already has something similar to that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Islands

If this Humber Island can help keep Sunnyside Beach clean and allow people to swim in it again then it would be a huge plus. Even if the island is kept as nature only. Hopefully a bridge can connect it for pedestrians and bicycles.

As for an Ile Ste-Helene type of development, there's always Ontario Place for that as well as the Toronto Islands which are barely developed to begin with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2012, 2:36 AM
skyscraper03 skyscraper03 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 20
Toronto is extremely boring in terms of natural features like river, island, mountains, and so on.
In other words, you make a city on a flat land, colour half of them with blue.
That's as simple as Toronto's geography is. lol

I think something like this in a bigger scale for human purpose(as the city's southern expansion) will transform Toronto into a higher and richer class.

Last edited by skyscraper03; Apr 16, 2012 at 5:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2012, 7:49 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyscraper03 View Post
Toronto is extremely boring in terms of natural features like river, island, mountains, and so on.
In other words, you make a city on a flat land, colour half of them with blue.
That's as simple as Toronto's geography is. lol

I think something like this in a bigger scale for human purpose(as the city's southern expansion) will transform Toronto into a higher and richer class.
Toronto is not without major geographical features. it is on one of the worlds largest freshwater lakes. It is also littered with amazingly under-valued valleys.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2012, 10:29 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
There is the Escarpment and Oak Ridges Moraine in the 905... plus Toronto has its share of valleys and hills.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2012, 1:10 AM
skyscraper03 skyscraper03 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
Toronto is not without major geographical features. it is on one of the worlds largest freshwater lakes. It is also littered with amazingly under-valued valleys.
Then it is time to think about why it is amazingly under-valued.
I know Toronto is less flat and simple than cities like Chicago. I personally think Don Valley could be a more significant urban geographic refreshment than Chicago River.
It might be the city master plan to blame.

The way it's devastated by the giant urban highways for instance...
I think fundamental mistakes that people refuse to fix has to be fixed.

Money seems to be always the primary concern/excuse, but the money Harper is planning to spend for fighter jets could easily remove the old concrete wall between the lake and the city.
(I mean undergrounding the Gardiner Expressway.)

Last edited by skyscraper03; Apr 17, 2012 at 1:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Toronto
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:38 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.