Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine
Honestly, that's one of the worst excuses for cycling. There are many European cities with a climate similar to Vancouver's who has triple the amount of bikers commuting throughout the city.
Burrard's St. Bridge failure in lane closure really has nothing to do with it. Metro Vancouver needs real biking infrastructure. A lane closure does nothing if infrastructure around the bridge doesn't support it... not that I supported a lane closure from the beginning.
|
European cities have 3 to 10 times the number of cyclists because they are reallocating lanes of traffic and parking for cyclists and peds. European cities also typically have car-free streets and zones which further encourage cycling.
The city is looking at some improvements to access to Burrard Bridge.
The main reason that traffic is backed up on the Bridge is the intersections on both sides can't handle the traffic. It has little to do with the number of lanes on the bridge.
To correct a previous post, 5% of trips on the bridge are by bike and 4% are by foot. These numbers will likely increase significantly during the trial.