HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 2:41 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
^i agree...and he will move his company into stationlands and have a tower there.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 2:45 AM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is online now
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,348
What will next week bring us?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 2:46 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
^a new money mart in manulife
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 2:56 AM
sdimedru sdimedru is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^a new money mart in manulife
you saying money mart's new HQ? Green Manulife 2?

i'm joking , as long as you are lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 2:59 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
an HQ is an HQ...imagine...for a second...a RFP for 500,000 sqft for a moneymart Global HQ and that is predominant name in our sky.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 2:59 AM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^a new money mart in manulife
Oh wow.
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 9:21 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,046
Money Mart's HQ is in Victoria.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 4:19 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is online now
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,348
Not for sale!

Drugstore billionaire Daryl Katz is not going to be the new owner of the Edmonton Oilers with a $145 million offer to buy the team as reported in an "exclusive" sourced-story by the Edmonton newspaper that is one of the 37-member ownership group.

"There has been no formal offer. Only an inquiry," said chairman Cal Nichols.

"To my knowledge everybody in our ownership group is happy and proud. We're flattered by the interest, but I believe the vast majority of our group has no interest."

Cal Nichols

And there's no need for Katz to make it an actual offer, says Nichols.

"Not for sale," he said.

"To my knowledge everybody in our ownership group is happy and proud," said Nichols of the group he put together.

"We're flattered by the interest, but I believe the vast majority of our group has no interest."

Larry Makelki of Lloydminster who is one of the major investors and the key to raising a significant number of the others, said Nichols isn't in denial or anything.

"We're not for sale. Everybody is happy with our involvement so far as I know. The only thing we're not happy about is that we're not in the playoffs."

While the Katz family did not step up as one of the 37 owners back in 1996 when this team was being saved by Nichols, there's no question they now have the money to buy the team.

And it's great to have somebody like Daryl Katz out there for sport support.

But that this ownership group "" all of whom put their money in for no reason other than to save the team and do something for their city "" is not going to chase the money should be considered exceptionally good news.

Edmonton has a special deal here. And these are special guys.

Having a 37-member ownership group is a beautiful thing. It gives the average fan a feel like the community-owned Eskimos, that it's very much their team.

"That philosophy, that feeling that the team belongs to the city, has really worked well," said Nichols.

"It worked well in putting the group together in the first place and selling the tickets after we did get it together. It involved all our suppliers and the people we do business with."

It's also going to play a large part in the building of a new downtown arena.

It's a lot easier for the city to rally around the expense of getting the building to bring Edmonton back up to standard around the league (not to mention our own city centre) with an ownership group created for reasons other than profit than an individual who, for all we know, could be the second coming of Peter Pocklington.

No knock on Katz, who became a billionaire in the last 10 years, but the original ownership group bought in when, as Nichols says, "it was so fragile, so high risk and our dollar was worth 63 cents U.S."

Considering Katz has paid the price to have Rexall on the building, sponsored the Mark Messier banner raising, and is involved in sponsorship of the junior Oil Kings, it would be nice to see him in the ownership group.

And that is possible.

"There's a retirement value if somebody has to get out because of bankruptcy, if they want to get out because they're getting older or, of course, in the event of death. The shares can go into the treasury or someone else can come on," said Nichols.

For those purposes the team was valued at $60 million in 1998 and is now at $96 million with a total of 7,400 shares involved.

To transfer a share requires 60% approval of the board. To sell the entire team requires a 67.7% majority.

Nichols said off the top of his head he could assure Edmonton that more than 90% of the owners have no interest in any offer to buy the entire team.

"Not for sale!"

terry.jones@sunmedia.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 4:20 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is online now
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,348
Is Katz the right man?

What kind of Edmonton Oilers owner would Daryl Katz be?

Hypothetical questions rarely mean a thing, but this one can't be overlooked for long.

It's valid to note that any 37-member ownership group is unwieldy and that several of the original Oilers investors have confirmed they'd like to get out while suffering no major financial setback.

From the beginning, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman doubted the stability of such a large group. Quickly, he became convinced that the Edmonton model could work because Cal Nichols and other group leaders were concerned more with the common good than with individual glory.

Their community-first approach, and nothing else, kept the NHL in Edmonton.

Current owners like Mark Cuban and George Steinbrenner share a common ego-first approach. They believe everything can be settled in two ways: their way and the wrong way. In a market of this size, it should be obvious that Katz, or any other individual owner, would have to find a more rational method.

As I see it, the drugstore billionaire's offer should include a provision that major contributors -- surely including Nichols, the current governor and major domo -- would remain as integral parts of everything that happens for many years to come.

It would be equally essential to keep master marketer Patrick Laforge and still-developing general manager Kevin Lowe involved, too, and for a long time.

Whether we need it or not, Edmonton is headed for a new arena, replacing the still-satisfactory Northlands-Skyreach-Rexall structure. To spend hundreds of millions of your tax dollars on a downtown edifice and then hand control of it to one man -- whether Daryl Katz or anyone else -- would be a questionable strategy.

***

Another Oilers partner, Ron Hodgson, has more than hockey on his mind this week. He has been focused on drag-racing, his first sports love.

Still rebounding from cancer treatment a few months ago, he spent the last two weekends at Fontana, California and Seattle watching the great Terry Capp drive a funny car at ridiculous speeds. "We had best (elapsed time) and top speed in California, the first time we turned it on," Capp said. A week later, in Seattle, they were almost as fast.

Said Capp: "We haven't really cranked it up yet."

As vicious rain washed out a scheduled weekend of drag-racing, Castrol Raceway general manager Art Eden found consolation. "We've already done some test-and-tune," he said.

He anticipates another big year for the sprint cars and late-model stock racers and believes the Rocky Mountain Nationals, as usual, will be a big success. Certainly, having Capp behind the wheel of the new Hodgson-sponsored funny car will mean good things at the box office.

"We'll be ready to go in a big race here June 7," says Capp.

***

One day, the Junior A hockey operators across the country will find a way to balance the playing field.

As the Camrose Kodiaks prepared for their shot at another Royal Bank Cup title, coach-general manager Boris Rybalka was too sharp to focus on the big advantage held by Ontario's Aurora Tigers, who dress a full roster of 20-year-olds. Most other teams in the final at Prince George, including Camrose, dress only six 20-year-olds.

A double standard of this sort is disgraceful in any national championship.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 4:21 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is online now
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,348
Bid won 'a lot of support'
But owners who wanted to sell held less than required two-thirds of shares
John MacKinnon, The Edmonton Journal
Published: Sunday, May 06, 2007

EDMONTON - The Oilers are not for sale, says Edmonton Investors' Group (EIG) board chair Cal Nichols.

But pharmacy magnate Darryl Katz remains a motivated buyer.

The 45-year-old billionaire has offered to purchase the team for $145 million.
Cal Nichols, chairman of the board of directors of the Oilers' ownership group, addresses a 2001 press conference.View Larger Image View Larger Image
Cal Nichols, chairman of the board of directors of the Oilers' ownership group, addresses a 2001 press conference.
Ed Kaiser/Edmonton Journal
Email to a friendEmail to a friendPrinter friendlyPrinter friendly
Font:

* *
* *
* *
* *

The offer -- for 100 per cent of the 7,492 shares held by the 33-member EIG is well above the club's own "retirement value" of $96 million, Nichols said Saturday.

The retirement value is the fluctuating price tag the club sets annually for EIG members buying or selling their shares, either to each other or to third parties.

"We're flattered by that," Nichols said of the bid, which was first communicated verbally in discussions between lawyers for the EIG and Katz on March 23. "I guess it's another indication that our franchise is very well managed and has some appeal.

The bid was rejected last week.

"We have no formal offer, only an inquiry. But the majority of our shareholders ... have no interest in selling."

Nichols acknowledged that some of the owners would be interested in selling the club at $145 million. But under the Alberta Business Corporations Act, an outright sale of a corporation's assets requires approval of investors whose holdings total two-thirds of the issued shares.

If Katz, or any other interested buyer, could entice Oilers owners whose shares total a two-thirds majority to sell, the remaining investors would have no choice but to do the same.

Nichols said that on the 10-member EIG board alone, owners whose shares total more than one-third are not interested in selling.

He said 25 of the Oilers 33-member investor's group met Monday to discuss the offer. The consensus was not to sell, a message that was relayed to Katz, whose Rexall pharmacy chain is the titleholder on the team's home arena.

When Nichols was asked if that means the matter is closed, he replied: "I would say, at that price, at this point in time, that's probably correct.

"There wasn't enough interest in a sale."

This is the first time since the group was established that anyone had expressed interest in buying the Oilers outright, and Nichols said the owners set up an ad hoc committee to respond to Katz's inquiry.

As well, Katz had two discussions with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman about buying the club.

"Ultimately, the franchise is controlled by the league," Nichols said. "They need to know our process."

Josh Pekarsky, a spokesman for Katz, said their hope is that the process will be ongoing.

"We made a good-faith offer that we believe represents excellent value for the club, and we've received a lot of support from a number of the owners," Pekarsky said. "The offer was for 100 per cent of the club because that's what the board requested.

"We fully recognize everything Cal Nichols and the rest of the owners have done for the Oilers and they should be applauded for that, but we also understand that many of the original owners now wish to move on.

"We remain optimistic that this can be worked out, but it's not our intention to negotiate through the media."

When EIG was established in the spring of 1998, the governance structure was set up to ensure shares could be bought, sold or transferred in a quasi-democratic fashion.

It was also set up to protect against an owner buying the club and moving it out of Edmonton

That's not an issue with Katz, who built a $20-million home overlooking the river valley last year.

Katz's bid does have the effect of setting a target price for those EIG members who would like to divest. But Katz's price is only available to them if the ownership group approves a sale of 100 per cent of the shares.

Any EIG member who wants to sell his shares must obtain the approval of 60 per cent of the other shares to do so. If that doesn't work, the governance structure calls for a so-called "round-robin" series of bids around the board table. And if that still doesn't satisfy the sale request, the investor can then take his shares to the open market.

"The reason it was done this way was so you could pick your partners," Nichols said. "And to have some fairness in the buy-sell part of it.

"Because, on any given day, any of us could be on the side of buying or selling."

The EIG originally had 38 members in 1998, when it bought the Oilers from Alberta Treasury Branches for $60 million, saving the franchise from being sold to outside owners and moved out of Edmonton.

Nichols views the group as custodian of Edmonton's No. 1 cultural icon, for which he and his partners have invested far more than money.

"It's a question of, philosophically, what serves the community best?" Nichols said. "Is a larger group of networks better able to sell Oilers tickets and product than one person?

"And, I guess, the same applies to the building."

He was referring to the much-discussed possibility of a new downtown arena, whose price tag has been estimated as high as $500 million. Nichols is a member of a committee struck by Mayor Stephen Mandel to study the feasibility of such a facility.

jmackinnon@thejournal.canwest.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 4:22 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
interesting...
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 8:28 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,869
/\ Very interesting. Rest assured that this is not over. There will be many conference calls, meetings, discussions with lawyers, bankers, accountants over the next couple of weeks.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 9:20 PM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
When you get to be as rich as Katz, you really have to ask hard questions about hidden motives. He's got a lot of money, but what are his ethics? He rarely speaks to the media so it's tough to know what he's like. What would he deem a viable investment for the city and the team? Will he part with his money to contribute to the team's success (funding an arena) or will he screw the taxpayers for money while basking in his riverfront mansion?

I can see why this bid got a mixed response from the EIG. Edmonton believed Pocklington had our community's interests in mind at first, but the team soon became expendable when his own financial situation wasn't ideal anymore. Would Katz do the same if shoved into a corner?

They're questions to keep in the back of our minds. It always seems like billions of dollars backing a bid for the purchase of a team is that shining light at the end of the tunnel, but to Katz, the fans might soon just become that 'annoying-unemployed-posh-wife' who has a million ideas for where to spend his money... all in the name of the Edmonton Oilers.

Maybe that's a bad comparison, but all I'm saying is, one good thing we have with a larger ownership group is not easily replaced with a single owner... that's accountability.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 11:08 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,219
/\ If his intention is profit....there are far far far better investment opportunities.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted May 7, 2007, 4:33 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,869
/\ Exactly...
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted May 7, 2007, 4:44 AM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,287
This is a man who's PERSONAL WEALTH grows by the cost of a new arena every year. He knows what he is doing and he knows very well that this team being extremely proitable is never going to happen.
However, it is also a man that despite his massive personal success has not really secured himself a public legacy of any sort, even in his hometown of Edmonton.
Could this be his attempt to remove the shadow of be recluse and be a defining figure in Edmonton?
Certainly purchasing the team and being instrumental in developing a new Downtown arena would achieve this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted May 7, 2007, 4:45 AM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,219
Great point HHD.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted May 7, 2007, 1:51 PM
IKAN104's Avatar
IKAN104 IKAN104 is offline
Big Dog
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhatdan View Post
However, it is also a man that despite his massive personal success has not really secured himself a public legacy of any sort, even in his hometown of Edmonton.
Could this be his attempt to remove the shadow of be recluse and be a defining figure in Edmonton?
Certainly purchasing the team and being instrumental in developing a new Downtown arena would achieve this.
Good point. Maybe his 25,000 square foot house was his first attempt.
__________________
-There's always a better way-
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted May 7, 2007, 3:03 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
katz is a wonderful option for ownership...EIG has many wonderful people. Perhaps they need to partner/JV

you run the team, i build the rink, rexall is the lifetime sponsor.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted May 7, 2007, 6:15 PM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,806
Filthy rich man wants to buy the Oilers so he could become more of "da man" in Edmonton - reminds me of Peter Pocklington. No surprise that the EIG doesn't want to sell the team to that guy. But I'm sure that Katz is not one to give up easily, though.
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:04 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.