Without reviewing these in any depth, the Redbrick LMD proposal seems to be the most walkable and urban. The Friedman Capital proposal (Slide 5) looks terrible-- skybridges have no place in a city (perhaps other than Anchorage or Minneapolis) and this building looks like a suburban corporate campus.
The DC government really missed a big opportunity by not moving the University of the District of Columbia from its Van Ness campus to the Saint Elizabeths site. This would have encouraged quicker development of Saint Elizabeths and provided jobs east of the river as well as made a very valuable site next to the Red line in upper Northwest available for development.
There are a lot of renderings and site designs via the link below.
What could St. Elizabeths east look like? Here's a recap of the master developer pitches
By Michael Neibauer
Washington Business Journal
Oct. 22, 2014
"St. Elizabeths east is the largest public-private economic development project in the District's pipeline. Nothing is more important to the success of that project than the choice of a master developer.
Keep reading for a rundown of the St. E's east master developer bids, based on presentations made during a Sept. 30 community meeting.
In July, the District released the names of the five teams that bid to lead the construction, or adaptive reuse, of roughly 1.6 million square feet of mixed-use and technology-focused development on the 183-acre Congress Heights campus. We noted at the time, as did others, that those teams lacked the big-name developers drawn to other big D.C. projects, such as Walter Reed and McMillan..."
http://www.bizjournals.com/washingto...e-heres-a.html