Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonboy1983
So the BoA has been around since at least the '20s. Isn't that the project that basically destroyed Chinatown?
|
That's actually a complex story.
It is true BoA is usually credited with being a big blow to Chinatown, which was located along both Second and Third Avenues between Ross and Grant.
But if you look at actual historic maps, that's obviously inaccurate at least in large part. And that's because Second Avenue between Grant and Ross was actually a park before BoA was constructed. And so while changing the park to the BoA ramp would have been an aesthetic blow, it did not actually destroy buildings in use.
And in fact, if you read contemporaneous records, there were still many Chinese businesses in that location well after BoA was constructed. Indeed, during that late-1920s/early-1930s period, you will see the news stories about the competing Tongs, and other activity which only gradually died off over the next few decades.
In other word, the timeline blaming it all on BoA seems wrong.
So what really happened?
Well, in 1875, the U.S. government began enacting a serious of increasingly restrictive anti-Chinese immigration laws that eventually basically ended almost all legal immigration from China during the first part of the 20th Century. Starting in WWII, there was a little loosening, but it did not really fully end until 1965.
Now there was still some illegal immigration, and also because of anti-miscegenation laws, discriminatory housing and employment laws, and all sorts of other discriminatory laws and practices, the unassimilated Chinese American population declined but did not entirely die out during this period. Still, without new immigration, many Chinatowns like the one in Pittsburgh, which had been established back in the 19th Century, declined and often died out during this long "exclusion period".
So why all the focus on BoA? From what I can tell, this story about BoA was being told at least as soon as an often-cited 1942 report. But from what I can tell from actual 1920s and 1930s sources, that story was inaccurate.
Nonetheless, it became the widely-accepted account anyway. And to be blunt, the true story of how Chinese were treated in this period of American history is still not something we talk about enough, such that I am not so surprised a "whitewashed" version of this history has dominated in recent decades.