Great photos! I just got back there myself and am sorting through my photos. Definitely a place I'd like to live if I ever moved down to SoCal. Thanks!
Location: Somewhere in the South of the Netherlands
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepper77
Great photos! I just got back there myself and am sorting through my photos. Definitely a place I'd like to live if I ever moved down to SoCal. Thanks!
Well, you must bring quite a big bucket of money. I have been told that rents in the part where I have been cost about $ 2.500 - 3.500 a month.
I don't know what the salaries are in the US, but to me a rent like that seems to be pretty high.
Well, you must bring quite a big bucket of money. I have been told that rents in the part where I have been cost about $ 2.500 - 3.500 a month.
I don't know what the salaries are in the US, but to me a rent like that seems to be pretty high.
Actually I guess that isn't too bad considering I've seen rent higher than that in Manhattan Beach, just a few miles south of Santa Monica. Even Long Beach (which is considered the cheapest of the beach cities) newer apartments can run around $2200 for a two bedroom rental. So I'm wondering if this is because of rent control in Santa Monica.
Nice pics, but technically most of the ones away from the beach are in (West) Los Angeles, not Santa Monica. Santa Monica is west of Centinela. West LA is east of Centinela.
Location: Somewhere in the South of the Netherlands
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkokieSwift
Nice pics, but technically most of the ones away from the beach are in (West) Los Angeles, not Santa Monica. Santa Monica is west of Centinela. West LA is east of Centinela.
I found that out too yesterday. I checked a site of the City of Sta. Monica. My relatives told me that they were living in Sta. Monica, but they are even east of Centinela. I will send them a yellow card...
__________________ RECENT PHOTOS: TORONTO • SAN FRANCISCO • ROCHESTER, NY • HAMILTON • GODERICH, ON • WHEATLEY, ON • COBOURG, ON • LAS VEGAS • LOS ANGELES