HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2011, 10:51 AM
finalcoolman finalcoolman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 255
Possible Bombardier Mark III SkyTrain Concept?!?

Check this out on Bombardier's website for the now renamed Innovia ART, our SkyTrain technology. On the top of the web page there is what appears to be granted just a concept image but still, is that the design concept Bombardier might be headed to when they do the next full redesign for a new generation of SkyTrain vehicle?

http://www.bombardier.com/en/transpo...01260d8000a648
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2011, 11:02 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalcoolman View Post
Check this out on Bombardier's website for the now renamed Innovia ART, our SkyTrain technology. On the top of the web page there is what appears to be granted just a concept image but still, is that the design concept Bombardier might be headed to when they do the next full redesign for a new generation of SkyTrain vehicle?

http://www.bombardier.com/en/transpo...01260d8000a648
It's been covered and announced long ago. Yes, it's the next generation MK III vehicle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2011, 9:37 AM
finalcoolman finalcoolman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 255
Really? Could you point me in that direction?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2011, 9:55 PM
Chikinlittle Chikinlittle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 264
Here's a concept for Translink Skytrain Mark III...

https://join.translinklistens.ca/S.a...36&m=600000285


It's from their current survey so the link may expire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2011, 10:18 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,260
I'm doing the survey right now.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2011, 10:40 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,657
Well, I guess we can assume that the 28 cars for the Evergreen is going to be Mark III?

And also, the refurbish option will remove some seats plus install the LED destination signs at the front of the train.

Last edited by nname; Oct 25, 2011 at 10:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2011, 11:02 PM
nova9 nova9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,085
I like how the renders have a reflection from the tiles on the platform, like it'll ever be that clean!

Also doing the survey now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 12:48 AM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,446
^Too true, it's a bit overkill with the reflection. Otherwise it's a pretty good rendering.

These MKIIIs look pretty sleek, though I have to admit in terms of aesthetic appeal I think there is a bigger improvement between the old MKIIs and new MKIIs than between the new MKIIs and the MKIIIs. That new paint job just makes such a difference!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 1:02 AM
Calebb Calebb is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 65
What do the insides look like? Will they have that ridiculous single seat at each end of the cab? The worst is sitting in that seat and having someone in the other car sitting the same seat. You're forced to look directly at each other
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 1:14 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,836
How fast can these things go on a longish stretch between stations?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 2:40 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I am happy that this cost/benefit analysis is being taken, as I thought refurbishment was a done deal. I suppose if instead of just ordering a few cars for the Evergreen Line, a big order is made for both that and to replace the Mk I cars, it may be a good opportunity for economies of scale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 3:14 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Think if they are going to go with MK3s they need to go with either 5car trains or a combination of 3 and 2 car sets that can be married for a 5 car train. I'd also be fine with just ordering more MK2.5 trains if they are still available and are any cheaper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 3:27 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Doubt that the MKIII's would operate any quicker then the existing trains as the system needs to maintain a set schedule. The Airport line in Beijing uses MKII's and they run at 100km, and I believe they are capable of doing 110km/h but there isn't really enough space between most stations to warrant increasing speed. At best you'd shave 1-2 minutes off a run.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 3:43 AM
Gordon Gordon is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,063
Nice sleek looking vehicle. What is the Capacity of these new trains?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 4:06 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,314
Any more info from the survey? I really would love to see the original Mark I trains (001-115) retired as they are too small for todays needs. Always packed when I see them (and then wait for a Mark II).

Can anyone post all the questions? I didn't get the survey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 4:07 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Just checked out the bombardier website, sounds like a win-win deal. I hope the cities decide to buy these puppies!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 4:13 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,314
How many cars would they order to replace the 115? and what types (A/B, C)? Here's an idea.

108 Mark II C cars which would give us 54 Mark II trains, then 8 A/B cars +the 28 for evergreen line for 2 car trains for that line?

Would this work out best? 54 Mark II trains+10 4-car Mark I trains? That seems like a massive capacity upgrade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 4:59 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Ooo... that looks way too nice and real... xD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Write View Post
How many cars would they order to replace the 115? and what types (A/B, C)? Here's an idea.

108 Mark II C cars which would give us 54 Mark II trains, then 8 A/B cars +the 28 for evergreen line for 2 car trains for that line?

Would this work out best? 54 Mark II trains+10 4-car Mark I trains? That seems like a massive capacity upgrade.
I'm nominally in favour of that idea; however, i don't know of the economics justify it that much anymore. It may work to retrofit the Mark II second generation trains, since those are like two years old at the least... but the Mark II first generation trains in comparison are like 11 years old now and they probably won't last that long in comparison to their proposed mid-sections.

In addition, when passing by the current maintenance shop, I usually only see 2-car sets being managed one at a time... so adding four car sets may slow down and add extra inefficiencies to the maintenance process. Or we can try some sort of detachable articulation joint like on the West Coast Express, although that poses its own unique problems.

Those concerns aside, the difference in size and spacing issue that may arise between the proposed new C cars compared to the current A-A joined arrangement could be resolved by modifying the design of the newer trains' midsections so that the doors of each specifically match the longer/shorter length of each end of the train.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 6:37 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,314
Let me continue to get mouths watering. Here are some videos of the new Mark III trains in 2 and 4 car configurations
Video Link

A Model of the new train
Video Link

Another view of the model
Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2011, 7:22 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calebb View Post
What do the insides look like? Will they have that ridiculous single seat at each end of the cab? The worst is sitting in that seat and having someone in the other car sitting the same seat. You're forced to look directly at each other
With that big window upt they must have moved the systems housed in the two closets up front to under the floor or in the ceiling of the car - so that would allow for wider seats at the front - but you'd still be staring at the next car when 2 sets are coupled together.

*********

The ability of the maintenace shop to fit a "A-C-B" train would likely determine wehther they buy that configuration. But remember that report posted a while back that said to optimize the capacity of the existing system, they need to start buying "A-C-B" sets now (otherwise they'll have too many 4-car trains (A-B+A-B)and that's not as effective as the 5-car trains (A-C-B+A-B)).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.