HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Reload this Page SAN FRANCISCO | 706 Mission St. (Mexican Museum + Condo tower) | 510 FT | 43 Floors
Register FAQ


    Four Seasons Private Residences at 706 Mission in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • San Francisco Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum

 
Viewing Page 9 of 24

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2016, 8:07 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
internal demo continues, just as longweekend reported. here a few last 'before' pics before things start changing



from roof of Moscone North



from Yerba Buena Gardens
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2016, 7:40 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
we have scaffolding, and a museum site dedication...
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 6:28 PM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
the scaffolding is looking more serious these days...
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 8:31 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
I wonder if Millennium Partners will face any backlash with this project considering what is happening with the Millennium Tower.
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2016, 5:59 PM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
looks like they've started removing the western annex portion of the building
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2016, 9:02 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
another look
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2016, 6:05 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbad View Post
looks like they've started removing the western annex portion of the building
That "annex" was how the building was previously stabilized and retrofitted.
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2016, 6:52 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
more gone...
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2016, 7:13 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
I wonder if Millennium Partners will face any backlash with this project considering what is happening with the Millennium Tower.
My above post is from August 14th and I continue to wonder; now, others do too.

http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranci...221&j=75874352
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2016, 11:57 PM
bluntcard's Avatar
bluntcard bluntcard is offline
Registered User
  
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Californiia
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
My above post is from August 14th and I continue to wonder; now, others do too.

http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranci...221&j=75874352

If they are able to move forward, who's betting they'll go to bedrock?
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2016, 4:30 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluntcard View Post
If they are able to move forward, who's betting they'll go to bedrock?
I'm betting they won't since it's not on bay fill and none of the buildings around it (that I know of) were built that way.
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 7:43 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
gradually peeling off the support addition of the old building...
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2016, 6:09 AM
edwards's Avatar
edwards edwards is offline
Registered User
  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rincon Hill
Posts: 363
10/03/2016
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2016, 7:04 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
today, before the rain...
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 9:53 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluntcard View Post
If they are able to move forward, who's betting they'll go to bedrock?
well, they're thinking about it, at least...


Quote:
...Millennium Partners issued a statement Wednesday that stopped short of saying it now intends to put pilings down to bedrock at 706 Mission St. But the company strongly hinted it was moving in that direction — starting with conducting test drilling on the site, across from Yerba Buena Gardens. ...

The company is taking another look at its plans even though 706 Mission isn’t being built on bay fill. The old shoreline is a couple of blocks to the east, and what’s under the new project is described as a mix of sand and clay. ...
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 3:33 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is online now
Registered User
  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 706
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbad View Post
well, they're thinking about it, at least...
making a change like this would delay things, what, a year or more?
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 5:45 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
making a change like this would delay things, what, a year or more?
It's better to be safe than sorry, both structurally and economically for them. Here's the Business Times article on the subject:

http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranci...548&j=76193221
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 8:40 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
the supporting annex is gone...



and a look at the north side of the building, where another small addition has been removed
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 11:24 PM
a very long weekend's Avatar
a very long weekend a very long weekend is offline
dazzle me
  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 94109
Posts: 824
^ ah damn, they took the trees down.
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2016, 8:14 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 
Viewing Page 9 of 24

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Reload this Page SAN FRANCISCO | 706 Mission St. (Mexican Museum + Condo tower) | 510 FT | 43 Floors
Forum Jump

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 AM.

      
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.