Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard
They call me a troll. Why is it so important to replace a bridge leading into new Westminster when they haven't played ball with any transportation plans in the past. Is the NFPR included in this Patullo proposal? If not then screw them they should be happy if the Patullo becomes unuseable it'll mean less cars driving through their precious city. GMT is part of a major transportation corridor with the ROW already set aside and prepped.
|
Both are pretty well used...
Patullo is a ticking time bomb without factoring in seismics. GMT is a time bomb when you factor in seismics.
I'd worry more about Patullo than GMT, but I agree about New West historically being difficult about it.
Burnaby does however have the RoW for the Stormont Connector ready to go. It wouldn't take much for it to be full expressway between Patullo and Gaglardi.