Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbanite
According to the 2010 census, there are 2,695,000 people in Chicago. They still kill us in metro population though.
|
MSAs (as used in the United States) and CMAs (as used in Canada) aren't comparable due to MSAs being far more liberal as to what constitutes a metropolitan area. Take the Chicago MSA and Toronto CMA as an example.
Chicago MSA
Area: 9,581 sq mi
Population: 9,580,567 (2010)
Toronto CMA
Area: 2,279 sq mi
Population: 5,741,400 (2010)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago...,_IL-IN-WI_MSA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Toronto_Area
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=188569
Chicago MSA takes in huge tracts of land and all the cities and towns located there. The Toronto CMA is at the other extreme as it doesn't take into account the entire built up metropolitan area. The Hamilton CMA and Oshawa CMA are omitted.
The MSA is too expansive while the CMA is too small. A better comparison would be to compare the Hamilton, Oshawa, and Toronto CMAs grouped together with various counties in the Chicago MSA that constitute a similar land area. Here's what you get:
Chicago: 8,503,325 (3,574 sq mi)
Cook County, IL: 5,194,105 (946 sq mi)
DuPage County, IL: 916,924 (328 sq mi)
Kane County, IL: 515,269 (520 sq mi)
Will County, IL: 677,560 (837 sq mi)
Lake County, IL: 703,462 (444 sq mi)
Lake County, IN: 496,005 (499 sq mi)
Toronto: 6,845,400 (3,158 sq mi)
Toronto CMA: 5,741,000 (2,279 sq mi)
Oshawa CMA: 364,200 (349 sq mi)
Hamilton CMA: 740,200 (530 sq mi)
Toronto and Chicago will be comparable in size in about 20 years.