HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2006, 3:10 AM
STERNyc's Avatar
STERNyc STERNyc is offline
Landmark Restored
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,407
NEW YORK | 980 Madison Av. | HEIGHT | 30 FLOORS | 2006 | NEVER BUILT

Originally posted at WNY by member TonyO.

NY Times
October 10, 2006
Architecture

Injecting a Bold Shot of the New on the Upper East Side


A computer rendering of the roughly 30-story tower designed by Norman Foster for 980 Madison Avenue, between 76th and 77th Streets.

By NICOLAI OUROUSSOFF
I expect Norman Foster’s design for a new residential tower at 980 Madison Avenue to infuriate people. Rising out of the old Parke-Bernet Gallery building, a spare 1950 office building between 76th and 77th Streets, its interlocking elliptical forms throw down a challenge to a neighborhood known for an aversion to bold contemporary architecture.

The tower’s height, roughly 30 stories, hardly helps its cause; as with other luxury high rises reshaping the Manhattan skyline, its scale is clearly driven by economic considerations. Defenders will point out that the Carlyle Hotel across the street is slightly taller, but the reality is that the Carlyle’s setbacks make it virtually invisible when viewed from the street. Lord Foster’s tower would have a far stronger visual presence, soaring above the apartment buildings flanking it to the north and south.

With a little trimming, though, this could be the most handsome building to rise along Madison Avenue since the Whitney Museum of American Art was completed 40 years ago.

The project approaches the existing building with gentleness, respecting its integrity without resorting to historical mimicry. And its glistening forms reaffirm the city’s faith in progress, suggesting that Lord Foster has a better grip on what makes New York tick than architects who have worked in the city all their lives.

Designed by Walker & Poor, 980 Madison’s austere limestone facades and urban roof garden were meant to replicate the stylish look of Rockefeller Center, completed a decade earlier. But the building signals the end of an era, not a beginning. Its low, subdued profile is the antithesis of Rockefeller Center’s soaring monumentality, giving it a curious sense of incompleteness. And within two years Manhattan would move on to embrace International Style Modernism with the completion of Lever House.

The building suffered through a major renovation in 1960, when the roof garden was stripped away and replaced with a fifth floor whose horizontal windows clashed with the formal rhythm of the windows below. Yet even after the addition it retains a straightforward elegance, serving as a bridge between Beaux Arts monumentality and classical Modernism.

Lord Foster was enlisted as someone who has handled sensitive historic sites, even if the results have been somewhat mixed. In his recent addition to the Hearst Building on Eighth Avenue he plunged a faceted 46-story office tower through the original 1920’s structure with stunning force, and the collision between the two is mesmerizing. But an earlier design for the courtyard of the British Museum simply smoothed over the differences between old and new, an approach that benefited neither.

Here, Lord Foster approaches the 1950 building with care, as if leery of riling old ghosts. The unfortunate fifth-story addition from the 1960’s would be demolished to make way for a spectacular roof garden framed by lush grass. And the tower is set at the building’s northern edge, closer to 77th Street, giving it a connection to the block between Madison and Fifth Avenues and preserving some of the current views from the Carlyle Hotel.

Most ingenious is the delicate way Lord Foster links the old and new structures. A slender exposed elevator core rises from the old building, connecting the 77th Street lobby to the glass tower. The tower’s petal-shaped floors begin 30 feet above the old structure’s roof level, so that the two buildings barely seem to touch.

The tower’s underbelly forms an entrance canopy at one end of the garden. From the street it would seem as though the tower were floating above the old stone base, its elliptical shaft stretching up to the clouds.

As with all of Lord Foster’s recent buildings, the forms are generated by environmental as well as aesthetic considerations. The tower’s interlocking ellipses and uneven heights visually reduce its scale, giving it a more slender profile as it rises. The elegantly curved forms were designed to limit wind resistance; the fluted glass cladding will collect solar energy.

But the tower’s outsize height is a problem. Manhattan was shaped by the hubris of developers struggling against the constraints of the street grid, and its beauty is a result of wild juxtapositions of scales, styles and architectural periods. But I’m not sure a luxury high rise should be allowed the same freedom as a major civic building.

Unlike Renzo Piano’s planned addition to the Whitney Museum of American Art two blocks south, the Foster tower will serve the interests of a wealthy elite, not the public at large. We’re not talking about, say, a project that addresses the city’s desperate need for middle-class housing.

And the argument that the tower’s height is in keeping with the Carlyle’s is misleading. One of Madison Avenue’s most comforting features is the way its scale shifts as you walk north from the corporate towers of Midtown and approach its residential neighborhoods. You read the street differently as the pace and intensity slow.

The tower need not conform to the height levels of its neighbors, but it should at least establish a visual dialogue with the 16-story residential tower immediately to the north across 77th Street. The challenge will be to scale back the height without sacrificing the elegance of the tower’s slender proportions.

These decisions will play out in haggling between the developer, Aby Rosen, and the Landmarks Preservation Commission, not in a design studio. (The building lies within the landmarked Upper East Side Historic District; the commission plans a public hearing on the project on Oct. 24.)

Lord Foster is not a social critic; his job, as he sees it, is to create an eloquent expression of his client’s values. What he has designed is a perfect monument for the emerging city of the enlightened megarich: environmentally aware, sensitive to history, confident of its place in the new world order, resistant to sacrifice.

Still, you cannot help but marvel at the project’s sophistication as a work of architecture.


A computer rendering, looking uptown, of Norman Foster’s elliptical tower rising on the west side of Madison Avenue.
__________________
Somewhere between Child's clarity and Libeskind's dazzle lies the future.
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2006, 3:22 AM
Gregorius's Avatar
Gregorius Gregorius is offline
Maui Built
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maui/Los Angeles
Posts: 119
Wow, I like it. I've always been under the impression that Manhattan could use a few less boxes, except I'm slightly worried about how it will fit into the neighborhood. I like knowing what the street presence looks like because that can make or break a building. Especially a building that is this small in Manhattan, its all it really has going for it.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2006, 3:26 AM
Gregorius's Avatar
Gregorius Gregorius is offline
Maui Built
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maui/Los Angeles
Posts: 119
Oh, nevermind. I should probably learn how to read before I go off on tangents.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2006, 3:28 AM
Jersey Mentality's Avatar
Jersey Mentality Jersey Mentality is offline
D-Block 5 Star General
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Time Free Zone
Posts: 2,048
I think it will complement the Bloomberg Building, arent they both in the general vicinity. I know Bloomburg Building is on Lexington but isnt it just a few block from the site?
__________________
New Jersey is smaller then Massachusetts but it has more people.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2006, 11:36 AM
Thefigman's Avatar
Thefigman Thefigman is offline
Not far from Disneyland
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Posts: 351
What a terrific looking building!

I wouldn't mind having this in my neighborhood.
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2006, 11:46 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by STERNyc




A computer rendering, looking uptown, of Norman Foster’s elliptical tower rising on the west side of Madison Avenue.
Very nice. I like it better than his planned 709 ft tower further down Madison.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2006, 2:23 AM
BINARY SYSTEM's Avatar
BINARY SYSTEM BINARY SYSTEM is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 119


LOOKS FAMILIAR........................? STOP BITEN!
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2006, 1:58 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
Everywhere all at once
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SI NYC
Posts: 2,448
OOOOOOOHHHH HOW EXCITING!!!! It's always nice to see a new highrise in a not-to-highrise-infested area. That and the Norman Foster-ness of it (yes i know he designed it, thanks) make it look almost London-ish, quite a different direction for the upper east side.
__________________
BUILD IT. BUILD EVERYTHING. BUILD IT ALL.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2006, 2:32 AM
Joey D's Avatar
Joey D Joey D is offline
I ate your kids. Sorry.
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wilmington burbies for now
Posts: 2,039
Very nice.
__________________
There goes the neighborhood
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2006, 3:13 AM
dmc dmc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 58
Another beauty from Foster. Congrats NYC!! Be lucky you got this design and not the one just announced by Foster for Calgary - pop over and see their new thread to feel smug.

I also love the Foster design for the WTC site, and of course the new Hearst building.
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2006, 11:39 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,890
Nothing surprising here...

(NY Times)

Plan for an Upper East Side Tower Meets With Disapproval

By ROBIN POGREBIN
October 17, 2006


A community board committee voted to reject a 30-story apartment tower designed by Norman Foster last night after Upper East Side residents expressed outrage over the project planned for 980 Madison Avenue, opposite the Carlyle Hotel.

“A glass dagger plunged into the heart of the Upper East Side,” said Dan Goldberg, a resident of East 76th Street. “Midtown is filled with lots of prima donna-ish buildings, so maybe it makes less of a difference there, but up here, our prevailing skyline is more consistent, and Foster’s aggressively futuristic vision of 980 Madison would kill that consistency.”

“What makes Paris beautiful?” asked Don Gringer, a Park Avenue resident. “Low-rise buildings, limestone, ornaments — all similar and somewhat matching but working together. Help us keep our Madison Avenue as beautiful and in character.”

These residents spoke during the public comment portion of a meeting by Community Board Eight’s Landmarks Committee at the Hunter College School of Social Work on East 79th Street. The committee voted 6-to-3 to disapprove the project in its entirety, a decision that now goes before the full board tomorrow.

The board’s decision, though only advisory, represents the first public position on the tower since the Foster proposal was made public last week.

The community board’s position will be taken into account by agencies, including the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission and the Department of City Planning, that will ultimately decide on the plan.

The Foster project is only the latest preservation battle for a neighborhood that just finished fighting an addition to the Whitney Museum, two blocks south, designed by Renzo Piano. Indeed, although the project has completed its public approval process , some residents are still combating the Whitney expansion with a lawsuit.

The Foster high-rise would be an addition to the old Parke-Bernet Gallery building, a 1950 office tower between 76th and 77th Streets that was at one time home to Sotheby’s auction house.

During the public session, Ward Blum of East 77th Street called the building an “uninvited intruder.”

Oliver Evans, a Fifth Avenue resident, likened the tower’s proposed construction to “plunging 30 sheer glass floors of Times Square Tower right into the middle of Madison Avenue” and accused the developer of doing it merely for his own “large profit expectations.”

The developer, Aby Rosen, appealed to the public last night, citing his other recent projects that combined restoration and construction, including Lever House and the Gramercy Park Hotel. “We seek your support and your understanding,” Mr. Rosen said. “I know it’s a very daring project.”

The British architect, Lord Foster, has made something of a specialty out of handling historic sites. This summer, he completed the Hearst Building on Eighth Avenue, adding a glass 46-story office tower on top of the original 1920’s building.

In presenting the project to the landmarks committee last night, Brandon Haw, a senior partner at Foster & Partners, said, “Yesterday’s developments are today’s landmarks,” mentioning the Guggenheim and Whitney Museums as examples.

“We believe it’s possible to add to this building,” he added. “The two will harmonize together to create a better whole.”

Not all of last night’s public comments were negative. Barry Schneider, president of the East Sixties Neighborhood Association, said he would hope that neighborhood residents were “ready for an architectural tour du force.”

Bill Jordan, of East 72nd Street, said of the building: “I would welcome the public amenities it would provide.”

The new tower would include 24,000 square feet of contemporary exhibition space as well as a rooftop sculpture garden.

Although the Carlyle is taller than the proposed Foster building, the hotel’s setbacks make it almost imperceptible from the street.

The Parke-Bernet Gallery building was altered in the 1960’s — 50 windows were added to the original 35, for example. The Foster design calls for replacing the original cornice line, windows and storefronts.

In his review of the design in The New York Times last week, Nicolai Ouroussoff predicted that the building would “infuriate people,” even as he praised it as perhaps “the most handsome building to rise along Madison Avenue since the Whitney Museum of American Art was completed 40 years ago.”

And yesterday there were signs that the debate over the Foster tower would stir broader opposition. “We find it to be entirely inappropriate,” said Simeon Bankoff, executive director of the Historic Districts Council, in an interview. “Talking about the architectural excellence is really beside the point.”
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2006, 11:51 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,890
NY Sun

Landmark Question Awaits Tower Proposed for Madison Avenue

By DAVID LOMBINO
October 17, 2006


Developer Aby Rosen considers himself a preservationist.The active art collector and top donor to the Municipal Art Society bought and restored two landmarked office buildings on Park Avenue, the Seagram Building and the Lever House, for which he won a preservation award.

But his latest project is causing an outcry from Upper East Siders who say the design for a 22-story elliptical, glass apartment building on top of the limestone Parke-Bernet Gallery building on Madison Avenue mocks the neighborhood's character and the definition of a historic district.

Mr. Rosen, the president of RFR Holding LLC, said the proposed tower, across the street from the Carlyle Hotel between 76th and 77th streets, would be a welcome breath of fresh air in the neighborhood.

"The Upper East Side needs new progressive architecture," Mr. Rosen said. "Historically, the people who lived there were a driving creative force behind New York City. Unfortunately, now the Upper East Side has lost a little bit of its progressive luster to downtown."

The project's award-winning architect, he noted, Lord Norman Foster, was recently praised by critics for his design of the new Hearst Tower on Eighth Avenue, a 47-story addition to an existing, landmarked base.

Last night, a member of Lord Foster's firm presented designs in front of a crowded community board meeting. Several neighbors spoke out against the tower. One local resident, Daniel Goldberg, said the proposal was "like a glass dagger plunged into the heart of the Upper East Side."

The co-chairman of the Defenders of the Historic Upper East Side, Teri Slater, said the project belongs elsewhere.

"We nearly fainted when we saw the renderings,"Ms. Slater said."The reason people want a historic district is they want to be preserve a context. If you propose something totally out of context, it defeats the purpose of having a historic district."


"Our area is vital enough. We love it the way it is, and we will fight to protect it," Ms. Slater said.

Designated in 1981, the Upper East Side Historic District stretches from 59th Street to 78th Street, roughly between Fifth and Lexington Avenues. It contains hundreds of mansions, townhouses, and apartment buildings erected by the city's wealthiest citizens at the beginning of the 20th Century. As part of that district, Mr. Rosen's project must be approved by the Landmarks Preservation Commission, which has scheduled a public hearing for October 24th. Another Community Board meeting is scheduled for tomorrow.

The president of the Municipal Art Society, Kent Barwick, was the commissioner of Landmarks when the historic district was designated.

"We weren't trying to freeze an area in time. We wanted there to be opportunities for good, new architecture but still protect the qualities that make it special," Mr. Barwick said.

He would not comment on Mr. Rosen's application until he previews it with other city civic organizations on Thursday.

The executive director of the Historic District Council, Simeon Bankoff, said the building's style, materials, and scale is "astonishingly at odds" with the area's character. He said that the Landmarks commission should not be swayed by Lord Foster's fame.

"It is not about the quality of the architecture. This is more about what it means to have a historic district," Mr. Bankoff said.

The director of the historic preservation program at Columbia University, Paul Byard, said Lord Foster's design was "moderately interesting," "well composed," and "certainly could be promising," but he predicted conflict. He said the Upper East Side is a notoriously difficult place for more contemporary designs.

"There will be blood on the floor," Mr. Byard said.


Upper East Side preservationists most recently fought the Whitney Museum of American Art for about two and a half years over a proposed addition just a block and a half from Mr. Rosen's proposed tower.A modified design received final approval earlier this year by the city's Board of Standards and Appeals, and a lawsuit soon followed.

Mr. Byard said that the Landmarks Commission is increasingly faced with pressure from some preservationist groups to only approve designs identical to a neighborhood's existing character. That leaves the commission with only legal oversight, rather than architectural oversight, he said.

"By insisting on a rule of sameness, you are taking away the jurisdiction of the Landmarks Commission, which is to deem appropriateness," Mr. Byard said.

Mr. Rosen, the developer, said he bought the Parke-Bernet Gallery more than two years ago, for roughly $120 million, with the intention of adding a rooftop tower on top. The gallery was built in 1950 and renovated in about 1960, when the building's public garden was replaced with a fifth story of offices.

Mr. Rosen said the total cost of adding the tower would be about $180 million.The public garden would be restored and the tower would be built 120,000 square feet smaller than what would be allowed under the existing zoning, he said. The tower would contain about 18 full-floor units and duplexes spread spaciously on 22 floors.

"They are going to be very pricey, but they will be beautiful and rare,"Mr. Rosen said. "We are creating a new landmark between the Whitney and the Guggenheim."

Because the proposed development would exceed the allowable bulk allowed under zoning regulations, a special permit must be approved by the city's Planning Commission and the City Council.

The local City Council member, Daniel Garodnick, said he is concerned about the proposal and will monitor plans.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2006, 11:59 AM
GFSNYC GFSNYC is offline
Realistic Optimist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 32
I really don't get opposition to this building. It is as if they're protesting for the sake of protesting, no validity in their arguement. Comparing Madison Ave to Paris is seriously weak - I'm sure Parisians would scoff at the statement. Besides, a cookie-cutter condo tower would go much further to destroy the dignaty of Madison Ave then would a dramatically designed tower.

Go Foster!
__________________
"Architecture is the art of how to waste space"
- Phillip Johnson

“A doctor can bury his mistakes but an architect can only advise his clients to plant vines.”
- Frank Lloyd Wright
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2006, 6:54 PM
Wheelingman04's Avatar
Wheelingman04 Wheelingman04 is offline
Pittsburgh rocks!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Salem, OH (near Youngstown)
Posts: 8,800
^ It is ashame so many people are against this building. I think it is gorgeous!!
__________________
1 hour from Pittsburgh and 1 hour from Cleveland
Go Ohio State!!
Ohio Proud!
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2006, 8:55 PM
Lee_Haber8 Lee_Haber8 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 757
^ I hate NIMBYs. This building will be preserving and improving the existing storefront and adding amenities to the neighbourhood. Yes it may go against the grain of the neighbourhood, but it is ok to have a few exceptions as that adds some variety. I'm all for a critical examination of any project, but a blanket no to any development is unacceptable. What NIMBYs don't get is that: 1)The city is not a museum and 2)Having no development contributes to sprawl
__________________
www.winnipegrapidtransit.ca
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2006, 9:05 PM
Thskyscraper's Avatar
Thskyscraper Thskyscraper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 655
Wow, NIMBYs know how to kill a moment. This is such a great looking building, it would really stand out. Ugh, I hope these NIMBYs don't kill it.

“What makes Paris beautiful?” asked Don Gringer, a Park Avenue resident. “Low-rise buildings, limestone, ornaments — all similar and somewhat matching but working together. Help us keep our Madison Avenue as beautiful and in character.”

So now they want to be like Paris... These people need to read NYguy's signature.
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2006, 10:27 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thskyscraper
“What makes Paris beautiful?” asked Don Gringer, a Park Avenue resident. “Low-rise buildings, limestone, ornaments — all similar and somewhat matching but working together. Help us keep our Madison Avenue as beautiful and in character.”

So now they want to be like Paris... These people need to read NYguy's signature.
True! And if they want it to be like Paris, they should move to Paris.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2006, 12:42 AM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
I can't tell from the renderings, but it looks like it could be one of two things:

A:One mostly cylindrical tower with a few offshoots and an awkward crown that really wouldn't work with the neighbourhood, or

B:Three Lipstick Building-esque ellipses conjoined, with an even crown, which would be amazing. The more I look at those renderings, the more it looks like this.
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2006, 3:50 AM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 12,703
Amazing project, I'm all for it. While I'm in favor of keeping West Side's pre-war vibe, UES area can definitely use something bold like this. If anything, Ariel East and West should have been built on this side of Central Park too.
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2006, 4:58 AM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,688
so the neighborhood wants fake historical buildings to be built?

I dislike historicism.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:07 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.