HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Central Park Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4361  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2016, 4:58 AM
streetscaper streetscaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,712
I can't wait for summer when 111 W57, Verre, and this rising high and poking the skyline from Central Park
__________________
hmmm....
     
     
  #4362  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2016, 2:23 PM
Mike.V Mike.V is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9
"Still, uncertainty persists. Among the biggest risks to Extell’s business is a $900 million gap in financing for Central Park Tower, for which Barnett is currently seeking a construction loan. IBI’s Yaniv Saylan said Barnett had not specifically updated his investors on that loan search, which is challenging amid a drought in new condo financing."

http://therealdeal.com/2016/12/09/ex...cesses-report/

Is it typical to not have financing when the building is already u/c? The investors certainly seem a bit skeptical based on those interest rates.
     
     
  #4363  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 1:16 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike.V View Post
Is it typical to not have financing when the building is already u/c? The investors certainly seem a bit skeptical based on those interest rates.
I wouldn't worry about it.
It's under construction, which is more than I can say about 2 WTC!!
     
     
  #4364  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 3:11 AM
gramsjdg's Avatar
gramsjdg gramsjdg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 755
I could be wrong, but the extraordinarily slow pace of construction might indicate a certain amount of uncertainty about the market and/or funding...

That being said, this tower is arguably the most important supertall going up in the country simply because of the fact that it will finally surpass the Sears Tower after 40+ years of height stagnation in the U.S. and really needs to be completed for that reason alone.
     
     
  #4365  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 4:08 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramsjdg View Post
..............this tower is arguably the most important supertall going up in the country simply because of the fact that it will finally surpass the Sears Tower after 40+ years of height stagnation in the U.S. and really needs to be completed for that reason alone.
I don't believe that this tower is trying to complete with any other tower.
This is just a very tall skyscraper.
     
     
  #4366  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 5:52 AM
jl4069 jl4069 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramsjdg View Post
I could be wrong, but the extraordinarily slow pace of construction might indicate a certain amount of uncertainty about the market and/or funding...

That being said, this tower is arguably the most important supertall going up in the country simply because of the fact that it will finally surpass the Sears Tower after 40+ years of height stagnation in the U.S. and really needs to be completed for that reason alone.
I agree on both. I've said this here as well. There is something very fishy going on with this tower. Seems they have been on the cantilever for around 5 or 6 months now. They are moving very slowly. Maybe the manic man in office will push this through as he may lower taxes and interest rates, keep on inflating this bubble!
     
     
  #4367  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 12:08 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,739
oh no lets hope they keep the full height and don't turn it into a stumpy because of some financial shortfund.
     
     
  #4368  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 5:37 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechTalkGuy View Post
I don't believe that this tower is trying to complete with any other tower.
This is just a very tall skyscraper.
Anybody who doubts that just has to look at One57. Arguably the godfather of the 57th Street boom. And that in itself is huge. This makes it seem like Penn and Teller. One is tall, the other is short.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
oh no lets hope they keep the full height and don't turn it into a stumpy because of some financial shortfund.
This is Barnett, the king we are talking about. Not Shvo or Silverstein.
     
     
  #4369  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 7:42 PM
Pierre9436 Pierre9436 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramsjdg View Post
I could be wrong, but the extraordinarily slow pace of construction might indicate a certain amount of uncertainty about the market and/or funding...

That being said, this tower is arguably the most important supertall going up in the country simply because of the fact that it will finally surpass the Sears Tower after 40+ years of height stagnation in the U.S. and really needs to be completed for that reason alone.
Yes, I've been waiting my entire life for a tower in NY to surpass the Sears Tower. They need to complete it ASAP!!!
     
     
  #4370  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 12:19 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
By Otie via YIMBY instagram

     
     
  #4371  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 1:11 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre9436 View Post
Yes, I've been waiting my entire life for a tower in NY to surpass the Sears Tower. They need to complete it ASAP!!!
Thank you both for at least calling it Sears. Sad to see her title go.
     
     
  #4372  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 2:14 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramsjdg View Post
I could be wrong, but the extraordinarily slow pace of construction might indicate a certain amount of uncertainty about the market and/or funding...
Construction hasn't been going slowly, and the cantilever was always projected to take many months.

If you see this project from a nearby tower, or follow progress on NY YIMBY you'll see the daily progress, even if not obvious from street level. This building couldn't fly during the cantilever stage. It's now, finally, rising above the cantilever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramsjdg View Post
That being said, this tower is arguably the most important supertall going up in the country simply because of the fact that it will finally surpass the Sears Tower after 40+ years of height stagnation in the U.S. and really needs to be completed for that reason alone.
I don't think this matters in the least. One WTC officially surpassed Willis Tower years ago, and the .1% of people who are skyscraper nerds who have a different interpretation of building heights don't really matter in the end. Your typical person doesn't give a crap about relative building heights.
     
     
  #4373  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 2:48 PM
faridnyc faridnyc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunser View Post
By Otie via YIMBY instagram

wish the come back the spire at the end , make this tower even taller
     
     
  #4374  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 8:00 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike.V View Post
Is it typical to not have financing when the building is already u/c? The investors certainly seem a bit skeptical based on those interest rates.
Not typical, but we see it often enough, particularly with residential towers.

I like how the tower looms over Broadway.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #4375  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 12:01 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike.V View Post

Is it typical to not have financing when the building is already u/c? The investors certainly seem a bit skeptical based on those interest rates.
A lot of NYC projects get financing way into the hard cost stage. Construction loans especially. This is not a NY phenomena though. Occurs in many cities. Read Crain's Business, and you'll see many projects that get loans or financing while they are u/c.

Some projects are funded via EB-5, and using that capital, is enough to get the project started while they wait for a bank to give the thumbs up for a loan.

To add on to what NYguy said, one of Extells towers recently got finance, and its 10+ stories up on the UES. Even one of the components of Riverside Center. Both residential project(s).
     
     
  #4376  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 3:28 AM
robertjhajek robertjhajek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ormewood Park
Posts: 349
Not gonna lie, this tower isn't as well designed or iconic as tower verre, 111 W 57th, or even cps.

It's just tall.
     
     
  #4377  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 3:04 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertjhajek View Post
Not gonna lie, this tower isn't as well designed or iconic as tower verre, 111 W 57th, or even cps.

It's just tall.
NO kidding.




http://therealdeal.com/2016/12/13/ex...ackstone-loan/

Extell secures one-week extension on $235M Blackstone loan
Central Park Tower debt came due Dec. 9






December 13, 2016
By Katherine Clarke


Quote:
Gary Barnett’s Extell Development secured a one-week extension on a $235 million land loan from Blackstone Group at its Central Park Tower, according to public disclosures made to its Israeli bondholders.

The extension will give the company time to refinance the loan, which came due Dec. 9. The extension is just the latest in Extell’s ongoing struggle to line up financing for the tower, which is set to rise at 217 West 57th Street.

The company secured the Blackstone loan in 2013 and had been counting on securing a construction loan to replace it, rather than going through a refinancing, as The Real Deal reported in the fall.

The terms of the loan dictate that, were Extell to default, the loan would go into a one-year standstill agreement, whereby Blackstone could not demand an immediate settlement until the latter part of 2017. The interest rate on the loan would also shoot up to 14 percent from 8 percent.

Barnett has already blown one deadline to repay the loan.

In a September interview, he didn’t seem particularly confident about racing the clock.

“We have a deadline to meet and we’re going to try very hard to meet that deadline,” he said. “That’s our job. Beyond that, I’m not going to speculate.”

He did not respond to a request for comment Monday on the extension or on his progress in securing a construction loan.

A Blackstone spokesperson also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Earlier this year, Extell scored approximately $300 million in equity from SMI USA, the U.S. subsidiary of Shanghai’s largest state-owned enterprise, for the project. But that agreement is also contingent on Extell securing a construction loan. If Barnett can’t close on a construction loan by July, SMI can force Barnett to buy back its equity stake for roughly $300 million, plus interest.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #4378  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 5:34 PM
gramsjdg's Avatar
gramsjdg gramsjdg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 755
What's the primary obstacle to getting a construction loan right now? Is it just that no lenders are willing to take the risk?
     
     
  #4379  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 6:28 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramsjdg View Post
What's the primary obstacle to getting a construction loan right now? Is it just that no lenders are willing to take the risk?
The luxury market has softened a bit the last year or so. It's the reason JDS is keeping the units at Steinway off the market for another year. They don't want to give the "relative" discounts that you see now at 432 Park and One57. Unlike office towers that usually get a significant signing before they can get financing, residential towers are largely built on spec. It really wasn't that long ago Extell got financing for the Manhattan Square tower currently rising, a different sort of residential tower.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #4380  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 7:30 PM
Pierre9436 Pierre9436 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Thank you both for at least calling it Sears. Sad to see her title go.
I don't recognize the name change from Sears Tower to Willis Tower. What is this Willis Tower and where is it located

The Sears tower is an amazing skyscraper that has held the title of tallest in the US for around 43 years. It's reign was almost as long as the Empire State Building, which is pretty damn good! I'm happy to see a tower eclipse the Sears Tower and I hope to see another in the US beat the Central Park Tower in the not too distant future.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.