Quote:
Originally Posted by casper
Poor working on the part of CBC. Why should a private company competing in an open free market have to account for a 13 cent gap in the price of its product.
It is not an issue of "can't" but an issue of "wont". It is not reasonable to expect an explanation.
|
Mmm, I think we all know the gap is not a question of profit margin, which would be an easy enough explanation to provide. We all know how the market works and that private corporations in a market economy are not expected to give away product.
If the companies felt the margin for gas sold on the south coast was reasonable they would have said so, but they didn't. After accounting for taxes, the company's operating, production, marketing, and logistical costs, and a comparable, and reasonable, profit margin, there is still a price gap of roughly 13 cents. The question is why. Again, if there's an explanation, determining that was the point of the inquiry.
If you feel gasoline marketers are entitled to charge whatever price they want, that's one thing and you're welcome to that opinion, but let's not confuse that with the fact a gap exists and they know if they tell the truth they'll confirm what everyone already thinks. Government already knows they're doing it, they are just looking for a reason to illegalize it.
(Also, why single out CBC for portraying it this way? Literally every mainstream outlet has used the term "unexplained" to describe the gap.)