HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1021  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2017, 6:44 PM
hamilton23 hamilton23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
The RER program has hourly express trains operating all day to Hamilton Centre GO. Not really sure what is involved in getting that though. RER's "completion" date is 2025, so 8 years out, but it could come earlier than that.
Hoping for sooner than 8 years, maybe 6 could work? Would love to just hop on the train in the morning and at night to go back home.

I find with the bus, you might as well just drive if you can.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1022  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2017, 8:22 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,808
I think later than 8 years is the way to bet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1023  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2017, 9:32 PM
hamilton23 hamilton23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
I think later than 8 years is the way to bet.
True
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1024  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2017, 4:19 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamilton23 View Post
Hoping for sooner than 8 years, maybe 6 could work? Would love to just hop on the train in the morning and at night to go back home.
Hamilton Spectator, Dec 18, 2008:

Quote:
Long given the cold shoulder for commuter rail service, Hamilton residents will have Toronto-bound GO trains to hop on every 15 minutes in rush hour and every 30 minutes the rest of the day as early as 2013.…

Ward 2 Councillor Bob Bratina, who sits on the GO Transit board of directors, says multiple variables, such as a teetering economy that could see fewer commuters heading to work, make specific timelines difficult to nail down.

"It may be a little soon, it's hard to say, but I would say that's a good working date," he said of the 2013 timeline.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
I think later than 8 years is the way to bet.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1025  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2017, 4:25 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,808
Maybe Bratina was on to something when he wanted to focus on getting additional GO service out of the province rather than LRT (although I personally think LRT is way more important). The province just doesn't seem to care about actually increasing service. Shiny new white elephant buildings they will do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1026  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2017, 5:00 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
Maybe Bratina was on to something when he wanted to focus on getting additional GO service out of the province rather than LRT (although I personally think LRT is way more important). The province just doesn't seem to care about actually increasing service. Shiny new white elephant buildings they will do.
CHCH, Feb 28 2014:

Quote:
[Transportation minister Glen] Murray says full-day GO will have to wait until the stretch of track between Hamilton and Aldershot is ready, and that could be another couple of years after the Pan Am games.

“That’s expensive. We’re talking $2 billion of investment to buy the track, upgrade the track and to get the equipment.”

Hamilton Mayor Bob Bratina who has long fought for all-day GO says he’s not disappointed with the timeline.

“I know there will be all day GO service and service will be extended to Stoney Creek and on into the peninsula. There’s no question about that. It’s in the long term plans of GO.”

Electric or otherwise, heavy rail is expensive to operate, so ultimately, the only real leverage Hamilton has in terms of expediting RER service is ridership volume. And that's never been especially compelling. During the Bratina mayoralty, GO Transit's forecast ridership (2031) for Hamilton's three stations was 900, compared to 7500+ for Burlington's three stations.

Part of Burlington's GO Transit dynamic is that a lot of commuters work west of Burlington, and huge parking facilities at those stations (on average, 2,500+ spaces per) are converting those commuters from auto drivers to train passengers: In 2011/2012, two-thirds of Burlington's ridership share was auto drivers, versus 7% of ridership at Hamilton GO Centre.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Oct 18, 2017 at 5:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1027  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2017, 12:36 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Has the topic of Hamilton and trains ever not been a complicated issue? I blame Sir Allan MacNab...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1028  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2017, 12:04 PM
Jake Potter Jake Potter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Hamilton/NYC
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
Has the topic of Hamilton and trains ever not been a complicated issue? I blame Sir Allan MacNab...
lol true enough
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1029  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2017, 12:57 PM
hamilton23 hamilton23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by thistleclub View Post
CHCH, Feb 28 2014:




Electric or otherwise, heavy rail is expensive to operate, so ultimately, the only real leverage Hamilton has in terms of expediting RER service is ridership volume. And that's never been especially compelling. During the Bratina mayoralty, GO Transit's forecast ridership (2031) for Hamilton's three stations was 900, compared to 7500+ for Burlington's three stations.

Part of Burlington's GO Transit dynamic is that a lot of commuters work west of Burlington, and huge parking facilities at those stations (on average, 2,500+ spaces per) are converting those commuters from auto drivers to train passengers: In 2011/2012, two-thirds of Burlington's ridership share was auto drivers, versus 7% of ridership at Hamilton GO Centre.

I think Metrolinx hasn't started taking Hamilton serious enough yet. Yeah, I know we got the LRT coming from Metrolinx, but to have two functional GO Stations downtown and no all day train service to and from Toronto is just dumb.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1030  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2017, 3:15 PM
movingtohamilton movingtohamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by thistleclub View Post


Electric or otherwise, heavy rail is expensive to operate, so ultimately, the only real leverage Hamilton has in terms of expediting RER service is ridership volume. And that's never been especially compelling. ...

Part of Burlington's GO Transit dynamic is that a lot of commuters work west of Burlington, and huge parking facilities at those stations (on average, 2,500+ spaces per) are converting those commuters from auto drivers to train passengers..
The fact that Hamilton has a GO station in the core of the city surely can be leveraged into even higher passenger volumes. Hunter station and Union station aren't providing, and can't provide, huge parking facilities to commuters. Montreal's Gare Centrale has a huge commuter focus, yet has no parking.

Congestion along the 403/QEW corridor is horrendous. Reliable and frequent GO service will help reduce single-occupant vehicle traffic.
__________________
Keep your hands and feet inside the virtual machine at all times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1031  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2017, 3:56 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
The fact that Hamilton has a GO station in the core of the city surely can be leveraged into even higher passenger volumes. Hunter station and Union station aren't providing, and can't provide, huge parking facilities to commuters. Montreal's Gare Centrale has a huge commuter focus, yet has no parking.
Instead, Toronto and Montreal have exemplary rapid transit connections interlined with their regional transit hubs. IIRC, Hamilton has connections to four HSR routes. But even Toronto only really started maximizing Union in the last 15 years (when GO Buses migrated from the Elizabeth Street terminal) so there's ample precedent for leveraging latent potential.

If commuters from other cities on the Lakeshore West line are travelling into the heart of Hamilton for work in huge numbers and using GO Transit to do so, that will help build the case for enhanced rail service. Outbound commuters are unlikely to get us there. As of 2011, 44% of Burlington’s workforce was employed in Burlington. 70% of Hamilton’s workforce was employed in Hamilton, and another 12% employed in Burlington. Roughly 22,000 commuters were heading from Hamilton to work in Mississauga, Oakville, Toronto and Brampton; it's not hard to imagine that those whose workplace is located in transit-supportive environs have already been converted to GO. Compounding the challenge As of 2011, under 10% of Hamilton’s workforce used transit to get to work , less than half the level of Montreal or Toronto (22% & 23% respectively). And some of those users may find GO Buses more convenient. (I would be interested to see how Hamilton's daily rail ridership compares to boardings on the 407 West bus, for example.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
Congestion along the 403/QEW corridor is horrendous. Reliable and frequent GO service will help reduce single-occupant vehicle traffic.
Aldershot GO, which is optimized for highway access, has a lot of potential in this regard. Metrolinx's RER forecast scenarios for the Hamilton CMA, which assign Aldershot 3-4 times the service levels of Hamilton GO Centre at full build, seem destined to enhance that station's appeal.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Oct 20, 2017 at 4:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1032  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2017, 4:33 PM
hamilton23 hamilton23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
The fact that Hamilton has a GO station in the core of the city surely can be leveraged into even higher passenger volumes. Hunter station and Union station aren't providing, and can't provide, huge parking facilities to commuters. Montreal's Gare Centrale has a huge commuter focus, yet has no parking.

Congestion along the 403/QEW corridor is horrendous. Reliable and frequent GO service will help reduce single-occupant vehicle traffic.
So true
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1033  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2017, 6:32 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
Is there a list of current ridership numbers from all GO stations in Ontario? I'm curious about the numbers.
Rail ridership is detailed in Metrolinx's GO Rail Station Access Plan (Final Report, Dec 12 2016), with current rail ridership information based on GO rail cordon count information from Spring 2016.

Here's a snapshot of Lakeshore West numbers:

Daily Riders’ Home Station (2016)

West Harbour GO: 50
Hamilton GO Centre: 500
Aldershot GO: 2,025
Burlington GO: 2,725
Appleby GO: 3,375
Bronte GO: 3,850
Oakville GO: 5,950
Clarkson GO: 5,150
Port Credit GO: 2,425
Long Branch GO: 1,000
Mimico GO: 1,275
Exhibition GO: 425


The same document covers Anticipated GO Rail Service Levels as well as 2031 Daily Forecasts for GO Rail Riders' Home and Destination stations.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Oct 21, 2017 at 6:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1034  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2017, 3:45 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,808
Wow West Harbour's numbers are pretty poor, although with no density around it, it isn't surprising. Hunter isn't bad, but at the end of the day, that's a long commute.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1035  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2017, 4:54 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,522
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
Wow West Harbour's numbers are pretty poor, although with no density around it, it isn't surprising. Hunter isn't bad, but at the end of the day, that's a long commute.
Having a local "market" is one thing... also helps to have the service though. And to be well connected to local transit.

With most RER trains planned for the downtown station, I think it will take some fiddling along the Hamilton CN corridor once the Confederation station is built (and stations into Niagara) before Mlx knows how to best balance the schedules and maximize the complementary services.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1036  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2017, 11:41 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
Having a local "market" is one thing... also helps to have the service though. And to be well connected to local transit.

With most RER trains planned for the downtown station, I think it will take some fiddling along the Hamilton CN corridor once the Confederation station is built (and stations into Niagara) before Mlx knows how to best balance the schedules and maximize the complementary services.
In the case of local RER service, Metrolinx’s modelling assumes that by the 2031 planning horizon, roughly as many rail commuters will be heading into Hamilton GO as out of it.

Daily Riders’ Home Station (2031)
West Harbour GO: Very Low (1,000 or less)
Hamilton GO: Low (1,001-2,000)

Daily Riders’ Destination Station (2031)
West Harbour GO: Low (51- 250)
Hamilton GO: High (1,000-2,000)


Should that assumption (presumably predicated on a substantial uptick in commute-worthy employment) fail to materialize, projected service enhancements will likely follow suit, since trains and cars are added as demand grows.

Just as significantly, if compelling local transit synergies don't support these stations — which they should since these are, lest we forget, identified as Mobility Hubs — it will be that much more challenging to convert auto commuters to transit users, ridership numbers will stagnate, and service enhancements will be a hard sell.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Oct 23, 2017 at 12:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1037  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2017, 3:23 PM
movingtohamilton movingtohamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by thistleclub View Post
...

Aldershot GO, which is optimized for highway access, has a lot of potential in this regard. Metrolinx's RER forecast scenarios for the Hamilton CMA, which assign Aldershot 3-4 times the service levels of Hamilton GO Centre at full build, seem destined to enhance that station's appeal.
Anecdotally, I'm on packed #18 buses to Aldershot, rush-hour mornings.

I'd like to know the percentage of Hamilton-derived passengers that make up total train ridership from Aldershot. Perhaps the Aldershot departure data is somewhat skewed, given that not all passengers originate at that station.

I wonder if PRESTO has aggregate data on this?
__________________
Keep your hands and feet inside the virtual machine at all times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1038  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2017, 6:29 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
Anecdotally, I'm on packed #18 buses to Aldershot, rush-hour mornings.

I'd like to know the percentage of Hamilton-derived passengers that make up total train ridership from Aldershot. Perhaps the Aldershot departure data is somewhat skewed, given that not all passengers originate at that station.
This is another dynamic at play, and it would be interesting to know what the ridership is outside of weekday rush hours.

I assume that Metrolinx would retire the 18 in order to convert bus ridership to rail, as they have done in Markham. That would presumably be built into their ridership projections.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1039  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2017, 6:40 PM
movingtohamilton movingtohamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by thistleclub View Post
This is another dynamic at play, and it would be interesting to know what the ridership is outside of weekday rush hours.

I assume that Metrolinx would retire the 18 in order to convert bus ridership to rail, as they have done in Markham. That would presumably be built into their ridership projections.
I imagine the phasing out of the 18 is years away. We need all-day train service from Hamilton, so that passengers can access all-stops service to Union.
__________________
Keep your hands and feet inside the virtual machine at all times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1040  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2017, 7:46 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
I imagine the phasing out of the 18 is years away. We need all-day train service from Hamilton, so that passengers can access all-stops service to Union.
By 2031, all-day RER service to Aldershot is projected to run every 15 minutes and all-day RER to Hamilton GO is forecast to run once an hour. Hamilton passengers will continue to have options.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Oct 23, 2017 at 9:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:13 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.