HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


    Old Post Office Redevelopment Tower [1] in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #741  
Old Posted May 13, 2016, 10:49 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,373
A lot of tacky talk here.

Has Trumpism infected SSP?
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #742  
Old Posted May 13, 2016, 11:22 PM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
"dated" is an understatement
Its more or less a restoration project so dated is what I'd expect from a 1921 building, the Merchandise Mart is also dated.

Edit* I see someone else covered this point first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #743  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 1:50 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
well. this has certainly been a news filled day on this subject.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...513-story.html

guess maybe he knew he would never be able to see this through, given the timing
Quote:
The deal with 601W Cos. closed for about $130 million, Mulryan said, but had previously been hampered by Davies' capricious personality. "If he had been involved he could have stopped (the deal)," Mulryan said. "I'm not saying he would have, but he had a habit all though his life of doing that on the eve of deals. He could be wild.

"We had some good laughs together," Mulryan said of Davies. "I'd told him he was out of his depth with the project and should sell, but he was laughing, joking and saying he'll outlast me."

Mulryan said when it came to selling the post office, Davies said, "I don't care if takes another 50 years!"
Yeah, nothing would have happened under Davies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #744  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 2:17 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Glad he sold it...
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #745  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 4:52 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
and when are either of those things ever going to happen? or are we prepared to let it continue to rot away when no other serious proposals hav been brought forward

casino could just as easily go on former michael reese land or something similar. rail terminal seems pie in the sky at this point.
A casino at Michael Reese would be a terrible idea. That's bound to be a suburban auto oriented hellhole. At the Post Office you squeeze it all into one existing, reasonably urban-friendly building where tourists can get to it easily via taxi and walking, and you avoid creating the kind of giant sprawling fortress that the Detroit casinos are.

If you don't make it easy for tourists, then you're just cannibalizing the same sad sack population of chronic local gamblers that currently drives out to Aurora and Hammond.

As for the rail terminal, it's really a matter of setting aside parts of the ground floor for a Metra concourse and ticket counter. Not sure how that is pie in the sky when Union Station's northern platforms already have a second concourse at Madison.
The upper floors would actually be much easier to lease for offices with a direct indoor connection to Metra platforms like Citicorp Center has.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #746  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 5:44 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
^^^ Gotta place the casino near the ghetto for maximum poor tax!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Chopped up and weird additions? The building is already a chimera of weird additions. You just don't notice it because they're all clad in limestone. I don't have any problems conceptually with deleting or demolishing parts of the building as shown in the 2007 rendering.

The only reason it's not being carved away this time is because 601W thinks they can lure Fortune 500 companies to the building based on its overwhelming floor plates. Quite frankly, I don't see why a successful company would want such a clunky behemoth as its public face...

This is primarily an office development, which means it is just as hard to get off the ground as any John Buck or Hines tower, but without the sex appeal and efficiency of modern architecture.
Maybe because its perfectly located on top of the Blue Line and both Merra Stations which is what actually matters to F500 companies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
Appeals to different tenants in an entirely different (and much tighter) submarket. If you could transport the old post office to a riverside plot in River North it would have been converted a decade ago.
Not really, the ownership situation with the Post Office has been the main hinderance. It's been owned only by the Feds and Davies, who was going to develop it again? Also, the superstructure alone in this building has $50-75/SF in value over new construction. That alone should make it competitive for corporates looking for value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
Imagination is about all the project has going for it until somebody starts actually spending money.
I think purchasing it for $130 million counts as "spending money"...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #747  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 6:23 AM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
A casino at Michael Reese would be a terrible idea. That's bound to be a suburban auto oriented hellhole. At the Post Office you squeeze it all into one existing, reasonably urban-friendly building where tourists can get to it easily via taxi and walking, and you avoid creating the kind of giant sprawling fortress that the Detroit casinos are.

If you don't make it easy for tourists, then you're just cannibalizing the same sad sack population of chronic local gamblers that currently drives out to Aurora and Hammond.

As for the rail terminal, it's really a matter of setting aside parts of the ground floor for a Metra concourse and ticket counter. Not sure how that is pie in the sky when Union Station's northern platforms already have a second concourse at Madison.
The upper floors would actually be much easier to lease for offices with a direct indoor connection to Metra platforms like Citicorp Center has.
I agree with both about the Michael Reese site and
the usefullness of a train depot and/or casino.

The sad reality of it though is that that would require number of government agencies getting their act together and finding the funding mechanisms in a timely manner. Having a private owner waiting on such dysfunctional agencies to clear up their objectives and infighting may take many many more years. What private developer has time for that.

Last edited by nomarandlee; May 14, 2016 at 8:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #748  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 7:00 AM
i_am_kyry i_am_kyry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Buena Park, Chicago, USA
Posts: 17
I always thought an Art Deco casino would be cool in the Post Office...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #749  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 12:59 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
I think purchasing it for $130 million counts as "spending money"...
Just buying it isn't going to get leases signed. The new owner will have to be actually underway with significant renovation/restoration before any big companies are willing to sign on given the history.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #750  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 6:09 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
Just buying it isn't going to get leases signed. The new owner will have to be actually underway with significant renovation/restoration before any big companies are willing to sign on given the history.
Which is what their plan is, based on the information we have thus far. What is the problem?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #751  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 6:11 PM
GregBear24 GregBear24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 191
I'm so f'n down with a casino in this building. If done right, it would only take one floor, and likely be so much better than the POS rivers casino. It would attract tourists like crazy, a little bit of riff raff, but mostly people with money who are either living in the city or visiting the city. The rest of the building could be used for office space, and the idea of creating a transit center of some kind is awesome. Point being, there are many possibilities for this building, and the increased amenities on the southern canal corridor as well as incoming residential development in the south loop makes this more viable than ever for redevelopment. I'm optimistic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #752  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 6:17 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,101
All of this casino talk is pointless. It isn't going to happen. We know what is going to happen, the new owner has told us. It isn't a casino.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #753  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 6:18 PM
HomrQT's Avatar
HomrQT HomrQT is offline
All-American City Boy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hinsdale / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,939
An art deco casino is like something out of the movies.
__________________
1. 9 DeKalb Ave - Brooklyn, NYC - SHoP Architects - Photo
2. American Radiator Building - New York City - Hood, Godley, and Fouilhoux - Photo
3. One Chicago Square - Chicago - HPA and Goettsch Partners - Photo
4. Chicago Board of Trade - Chicago - Holabird & Root - Photo
5. Cathedral of Learning - Pittsburgh - Charles Klauder - Photo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #754  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 7:00 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,358
With some real forward movement with the OPO over the last few days it really does shape up a wild month. Finally real plans for the old Cook County Hospital. Imminent starts for Wanda, Riverline, and WP East. Finally some activity to speak of at dormant sites at Nordstroms and old Rezko river lot. An imminent design decision and location likely coming on the Obama library and Lucas possibly moving.

What other major news am I msising I can't think of. What a month or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #755  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 7:05 PM
sloop.chi sloop.chi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 73
I will put my prediction down, McDonalds Chicago HQ will here. We could hear an announcement of their intentions to move downtown in the summer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #756  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 7:07 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by sloop.chi View Post
i will put my prediction down, mcdonalds chicago hq will here. We could hear an announcement of their intentions to move downtown in the summer
+1
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #757  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 8:04 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
With some real forward movement with the OPO over the last few days it really does shape up a wild month. Finally real plans for the old Cook County Hospital. Imminent starts for Wanda, Riverline, and WP East. Finally some activity to speak of at dormant sites at Nordstroms and old Rezko river lot. An imminent design decision and location likely coming on the Obama library and Lucas possibly moving.

What other major news am I msising I can't think of. What a month or so.
I would imagine we'll hear something from Related on their plans for the Spire site in the not too distant future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #758  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 8:07 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by sloop.chi View Post
I will put my prediction down, McDonalds Chicago HQ will here. We could hear an announcement of their intentions to move downtown in the summer
I don't think the timing is right for McDonald's. My money would be them moving into Sears sometime in 2017 with an announcement within the next 3 months. Walgreens is a potential for the Post Office though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #759  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 8:41 PM
richb richb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 142
I doubt any large company would make it it's HQ. It would be best as something similar to Merchandise Mart, many many tenants of different sizes. Granted it will take twenty years for it to be like MM (it will take quite a while to fill that much space with smaller tenants) and it wouldn't likely have an industry of one type (even MM isn't that so much anymore).

Having more tenants of smaller sizes would make the building more stable financially long term and keep occupancy up. MM has never really had major problems with un-rented space, which older buildings can have. Having a large company make its HQ there would be flashy, but they would never stay long, and then you got a huge empty space again. Face it, large corporations still prefer new construction for HQ's.

The old Post Office would be great space for back office operations, company data centers, startups, call centers and small tech firms. Yeah, nothing flashy, but it would make for a profitable building. And it would fill it, and keep it mostly full.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #760  
Old Posted May 14, 2016, 9:47 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
Let's not overestimate how much of the Mart is tech—or office space of any kind. Without CoStar access, I'll guesstimate somewhere around 250,000 square feet is any kind of office space.

The old post office is 10 times that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.