HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2024, 1:19 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,337
City committee to consider Smart Living’s nine-storey Nelson Street proposal

David Sali, OBJ
February 26, 2024 3:42 PM ET





An Ottawa firm that wants to tear down a row of buildings on Bank Street and replace them with a residential and commercial development will see a separate proposal for a rental complex in Lowertown go before a city committee this week.

Smart Living Properties plans to construct a nine-storey building with 421 rental apartments at 112 and 134 Nelson St., just north of Rideau Street and a block east of King Edward Avenue.

The proposal is a revised version of a plan submitted in 2021 that called for a smaller nine-storey building at 112 Nelson St. with 322 rental units. Smart Living has since acquired the neighbouring property at 134 Nelson St. and expanded its proposal.

The L-shaped parcel of land is currently occupied by a two-storey warehouse at 112 Nelson and a one-storey commercial building at 134 Nelson that would be demolished to make way for the new development.

Like the previous proposal, the new project is aimed at young professionals who live downtown and walk or take transit to work rather than drive.

Smart Living’s plan includes an underground garage with 18 parking spaces for residents, well below the minimum total of 164 spots required under current zoning bylaws, along with 17 spaces for visitors and five spaces reserved for car-sharing services. The rest of the garage would be set aside for up to 482 bicycles.

At a public consultation last spring attended by about 10 residents, ward councillor Stéphanie Plante and city staff, some residents expressed concerns about the lack of car parking, according to a city staff report.

But in planning documents submitted with its proposal, Smart Living argues that mandated parking minimums create “significant environmental, economic, and social harms” because they encourage driving at the expense of transit use, require more land for parking and make it “more difficult to achieve pedestrian-friendly, 15-minute communities.”

The application goes on to say that parking spaces are “costly, whether they are surface parking spaces that create an opportunity cost, or below-grade spaces that are extremely expensive to construct,” adding that the extra costs “are typically passed to residents, impacting housing affordability.”

City staff argue the proposal would add needed density to a neighbourhood that is close to light rail and other public transit options, noting that “a minimum of 10 per cent” minimum of its apartments will be three-bedroom units under an agreement with the developer.

“The proposed reduction in motor vehicle parking is supportable given the location of the site within (200 metres) of both Rideau Street and King Edward Avenue, which are frequented by transit, and within (800 metres) of the Rideau O-Train Station,” the staff report says.

In addition to the 10 per cent minimum for three-bedroom units, Smart Living has also agreed to provide about $535,000 for ward improvements under the city’s Community Benefits Charge bylaw.

These include up to $200,000 for the planting of new trees, “improvements to public space” and community safety initiatives. In addition, the developer will pay $60,000 to fund security upgrades to a daycare facility and $275,000 into an account for affordable housing projects.

The city’s planning and housing committee will consider the proposal on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, Smart Living Properties has also filed a proposal for a nine-storey mixed-use building in Centretown.

The project would be built on land now occupied by four heritage buildings. The firm wants to tear down the bulk of the existing two- and three-storey commercial buildings at 178 Nepean St. and 219 and 223 Bank St. and replace them with a mixed-use development that would include 263 rental suites and nearly 11,000 square feet of ground-floor retail space.

It would be among the most ambitious projects yet for Smart Living, which specializes in building and managing “all-inclusive” apartments – fully furnished and decorated suites in which all utilities, including heat, hydro, water and air conditioning, as well as other amenities such as high-speed internet and smart TVs, are included in the rental price.

https://obj.ca/city-committee-to-con...reet-proposal/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2024, 1:32 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,337
Latest imagery (Feb 2023):

https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applica...1-0115/details

They have a couple of Before & After images here: http://webcast.ottawa.ca/plan/All_Im...12-21-0115.PDF
















Last edited by rocketphish; Feb 27, 2024 at 3:38 AM. Reason: Added another floorplan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2024, 2:25 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,662
Unbelievable number of units for a 9 story building. Truly a sidescraper. I'm all for it, though. Lowertown desperately needs a little gentrification.

Edit: Woodman does all their plans in metric. It's such a pain to bid on their designs. I have to convert EVERYTHING to imperial because building materials are sold in imperial units in Canada.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2024, 3:55 AM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley613 View Post
Unbelievable number of units for a 9 story building. Truly a sidescraper. I'm all for it, though. Lowertown desperately needs a little gentrification.

Edit: Woodman does all their plans in metric. It's such a pain to bid on their designs. I have to convert EVERYTHING to imperial because building materials are sold in imperial units in Canada.
Metric is so much easier to work with for adding up values. For architectural drawings I can't think in imperial. All the City building standards are in metric only. Eventually Canada will hopefully completely switch to metric. It can't come too soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2024, 4:32 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proof Sheet View Post
Metric is so much easier to work with for adding up values. For architectural drawings I can't think in imperial. All the City building standards are in metric only. Eventually Canada will hopefully completely switch to metric. It can't come too soon.
Nice, theoretically. I'm all for metric. The problem is that all of my supplies (and virtually the entire building industry in this country) are in imperial.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2024, 1:27 PM
Badyouken's Avatar
Badyouken Badyouken is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 237
That is quite dense for a 9-storey building.

I'm not a fan of how grey it is, at least that vista from King Edward in the renderings. I feel like red/brown brick would have fit the neighbourhood better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2024, 6:01 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Overall, this looks quite good. I don't mind the colour scheme too much, as long as this doesn't become the norm, which no doubt it will, unfortunately. But sure, red or brown brick would be better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2024, 8:14 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Item was withdrawn from the Planning Committee last week. No explanation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2024, 3:31 AM
rdaner rdaner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 130
I imagine that they will want to go higher.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:57 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.