HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #401  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 2:00 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,886
to bad its a vage story as to what exactly their doing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #402  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 7:59 PM
dsim249's Avatar
dsim249 dsim249 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 957
Well, we're finally caught up with the rest of Canada! Although I don't think we were too far behind Manitoba...

SGI unveiled Saskatchewan's new one-piece driver's license today.


Source

Saskatchewan's new one-part driver's licence contains better security features and will be more convenient for customers, SGI Minister Tim McMillan says.

The look of the new licence was unveiled at the provincial legislature Thursday, but the licences won't be available to the public until 2011.

"I think that people in Saskatchewan for a long time have recognized they're the only people in Canada that have a two-piece," said McMillan of the reasoning behind the upgrade.

"The other (factor) would be security. There's a substantial amount of security on this card."

Various security features are obvious -- such as a fine-lined pattern behind the photo and a clear window in the corner containing a second photo image of the card holder.

But McMillan said further security features are embedded in the cards to protect against attempts to make counterfeit copies.

A bar code on the back can be scanned by police agencies if they have the technology, but it will only provide the information already stated on the front of the card, such as name and address, he said.

The licence changeover is coming at a cost of $2.7 million. McMillan said that's substantially less than earlier estimates of $6 million because tenders came in lower than expected. As well, the province is not including digital face recognition software, which was at one time considered, he said.


Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/piece+...#ixzz15lC6j1Vj

__________________________

I'm a fan. I think they look great. I'm glad they went with something a little more interesting than Manitoba's new one. The clear window with your picture printed on it is a cool security feature too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #403  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 8:17 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayM View Post
You should really think of the loss of production and refining of mined minerals from Manitoba.
It doesn't matter what I think. Of course these minerals and metals are needed but if the Thompson facility isn't profitable there is no point in continuing operations.

Same thing happened in Pine Falls. It's sad but that's reality.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #404  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 10:24 PM
JayM's Avatar
JayM JayM is offline
Youth of a Nation
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
It doesn't matter what I think. Of course these minerals and metals are needed but if the Thompson facility isn't profitable there is no point in continuing operations.

Same thing happened in Pine Falls. It's sad but that's reality.
Actually it is profitable, Vale just wants to push the community around as well as the Provincial Government around and ask for a tax break.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #405  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2010, 6:27 PM
JayM's Avatar
JayM JayM is offline
Youth of a Nation
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,196
Thompsons Facebook page shows a preview of the new Transit Buses 1 of the 2 produced by New Flyer.

Photos

Last edited by JayM; Dec 5, 2010 at 6:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #406  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 7:42 PM
JayM's Avatar
JayM JayM is offline
Youth of a Nation
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,196
Northern Allowance raised
December 24, 2010

By Ryan Flanagan
news@thompsoncitizen.net


The provincial government is increasing the Employment and Income Assistance Northern allowance by five per cent starting in January, Family Services and Consumer Affairs Minister Gord Mackintosh announced on Dec. 16.

“The cost of living is higher in remote and Northern communities and low-income residents sometimes need a little extra help to make healthy food choices for their families,” said Mackintosh. “We want to treat Manitobans in every part of the province fairly.”

Read More
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #407  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 8:36 PM
Boreal's Avatar
Boreal Boreal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,699
Money for EVERYONE! Make it rain!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #408  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2010, 5:22 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,886
boreal u ever lived up north?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #409  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2010, 4:04 PM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreal View Post
Money for EVERYONE! Make it rain!
Northern allowance is simply compensation for living in hell. It should be raised yearly to keep up with inflation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #410  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2010, 5:05 PM
RTD RTD is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 867
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Northern allowance is simply compensation for living in hell. It should be raised yearly to keep up with inflation.
Why do you consider living up north "hell"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #411  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2010, 5:08 PM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTD View Post
Why do you consider living up north "hell"?
Because I live there.... Not quite high enough for northern allowance though. Seriously though, I was more talking about hell in the cost end of things.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #412  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2010, 7:18 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Because I live there.... Not quite high enough for northern allowance though. Seriously though, I was more talking about hell in the cost end of things.

the trade off those is ur backyard may not be the rockies but its still pritty sweet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #413  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2010, 12:44 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,284
It is actually. I was planning to live in the city, but things took a turn and now I'm back home...and probably to stay, since I'll be buying into my parents business. I like where I live...except that the bugs are bad, and the amenities of the city are so far away.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #414  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 11:10 PM
RTD RTD is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 867
Interesting article about Potash in Manitoba:

Where's our potash bonanza?-- Sask. boom dwarfs Manitoba's sector -- Capital demand biggest challengeBy: Martin Cash

Posted: 26/08/2010 1:00 AM | Comments: 3

Print E–mail 0Share0Share3Report Error Manitobans can only look longingly across the Saskatchewan line as one of the world's largest corporate deals percolates, featuring valuations unimaginable in the Manitoba corporate sector.

Australian-based BHP Billiton is offering $39 billion to acquire Saskatoon-based Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan in a deal that is making headlines around the world.

There have been plenty of headlines about potash in Manitoba over the years. But while a huge industry has been created in Saskatchewan, producing one-quarter of the world's potash and generating more than $1 billion in provincial royalties annually, nothing but a modest amount of exploration dollars -- and those headlines -- have been generated in Manitoba.

Potash Corp.'s board has rejected the BHP Billiton offer and is now in talks with other potential bidders.

The company's stock closed at $154.51, down $3.29, on Wednesday. In the dying days of the bull market before the market crash in the fall of 2008, Potash Corp. was the largest company in the country by market capitalization.

Manitoba's flirtation with potash -- and, sadly, that's all it's been -- goes back more than 30 years.

One of the main planks of Sterling Lyon's Progressive Conservative party's election campaign of 1981 was to facilitate a $600-million potash mine development in the Russell/Binscarth region, with more than 500 jobs.

Howard Pawley's NDP defeated Lyon, but more headlines ensued about the riches the province would reap from a potash megaproject and the hundreds of jobs it would create.

Partners in the provincial Crown corporation, Manitoba Potash Corp., came and went, with the province retaining ownership of 49 per cent of the deposit along the Saskatchewan border.

But while potash production in Saskatchewan has grown into a world-class undertaking, essentially transforming it from a have-not province, the dream of potash riches in Manitoba continues its long, drawn-out fizzle.

In 2005 Agrium Inc., the Calgary-based potash producer, invested $1 million in St. Lazare and in 2008, Western Potash Corp. started a $5-million exploration project in the same region.

Three years ago, the latest exploration of Manitoba Potash Corp.'s deposit was announced with the province's newest partner, none other than BHP Billiton.

That $15-million exploration project announced in early 2007 was still being touted as the possible source of 360 jobs in the region.

Alas, the latest status report of those efforts, according to Chris Beaumont-Smith, manager of mineral policy and business development at the mineral resources branch of Manitoba Innovation, Energy and Mines, who is effectively the province's representative to Manitoba Potash Corp., is not promising.

"It has been determined the amount of potash there is insufficient to do a large capital investment," Beaumont-Smith said.

Agrium recently acquired a five-year permit on its property and there always remains the possibility its research and exploration could generate results that could lead to the development of a mine.

But there is some thinking in the mining community that if there is any hope at all of potash production in Manitoba, the various properties will have to be combined.

While this province is having its own unqualified successes in the mining sector, they are dwarfed by the scale of capital required for potash production.

For instance, HudBay Mineral's Lalor gold and zinc project near Snow Lake is in the early stages of its $500-million-plus development and is a real boom for the Flin Flon/Snow Lake region.

But in today's dollars, if that Russell/Binscarth potash deposit was large enough to develop, it would cost more than $3 billion to get it going.

It's no wonder the province does not want to let that dream die.

martin.cash@freepress.mb.ca

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The present provincial government's policy is to keep Manitoba as a have not province dependent on federal transfer payments. In have provinces the common wealth is built on honest and productive enterprise which is in the hands of the producers. The role of government is fairly limited because of a diminished need for government services. Instead, the Manitoba government strives to be the arbiter of a spoils system built upon fleecing the honest and productive enterprise of taxpayers in other provinces.
To do so, they have to obstruct economic development, plain and simple.
With fully developed hydro, potash and oil, added to our industrial and distribution markets, Manitoba can finally be a have province.
But first, we need a government that understands the entrepreneurial sector and sees it as a generator of wealth, rather than a cash cow to be fed on.
To get such a government, we need an informed electorate not a cargo cult that can be blackmailed by a bunch of poverty pimps.

I still say it's just a matter of time before Manitoba see's it's own economic boom as a result of natural resource extraction. It's just a matter of getting the proper government in to create an environment that is enticing to investors. It's a question of when; not if.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #415  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 11:36 PM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTD View Post
The present provincial government's policy is to keep Manitoba as a have not province dependent on federal transfer payments. In have provinces the common wealth is built on honest and productive enterprise which is in the hands of the producers. The role of government is fairly limited because of a diminished need for government services. Instead, the Manitoba government strives to be the arbiter of a spoils system built upon fleecing the honest and productive enterprise of taxpayers in other provinces.
To do so, they have to obstruct economic development, plain and simple.
With fully developed hydro, potash and oil, added to our industrial and distribution markets, Manitoba can finally be a have province.
But first, we need a government that understands the entrepreneurial sector and sees it as a generator of wealth, rather than a cash cow to be fed on.
To get such a government, we need an informed electorate not a cargo cult that can be blackmailed by a bunch of poverty pimps.

I still say it's just a matter of time before Manitoba see's it's own economic boom as a result of natural resource extraction. It's just a matter of getting the proper government in to create an environment that is enticing to investors. It's a question of when; not if.
I don't disagree with some of the points you're making, but what specific policies do you think the conservatives (or any party, for that matter) would introduce that would bring these sweeping changes in? Cut taxes, cut spending is what I often hear - but since the vast majority of the budget goes to healthcare, education, and infrastructure, where exactly are these cuts going to come from? Is a small reduction in business taxes really going to make or break multi-billion dollar deals for companies to set up here?

To those who continually hate on anything the NDP does, and the "socialist" policies they have in place, I'd love to hear some concrete alternatives. Based on the PC platform of 2007 (where bringing back the jets, and not privatizing hydro were 2 of the 5 planks), the alternative is not much different... Take a glance at the PCs website right now. They promise to invest MORE in healthcare, MORE in education, MORE to the environment, MORE resources to fight crime, MORE for urban infrastructure... And yet, they will somehow also cut taxes for businesses, families, seniors? Rigggghhhhhht...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #416  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2010, 12:02 AM
RTD RTD is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdog View Post
I don't disagree with some of the points you're making, but what specific policies do you think the conservatives (or any party, for that matter) would introduce that would bring these sweeping changes in? Cut taxes, cut spending is what I often hear - but since the vast majority of the budget goes to healthcare, education, and infrastructure, where exactly are these cuts going to come from? Is a small reduction in business taxes really going to make or break multi-billion dollar deals for companies to set up here?
How about some additional incentives to entice companies to explore for potential untapped resources? And once discovered, perhaps more incentives to start extraction? Remember the saying "it takes money to make money"? It might take some short-term pain in order to achieve the long-term gain that would follow. I'm a supporter of that. I'm sure that other jurisdictions out there had a hand in kick-starting their natural resource industries somehow, and have reaped the rewards that follow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdog View Post
To those who continually hate on anything the NDP does, and the "socialist" policies they have in place, I'd love to hear some concrete alternatives. Based on the PC platform of 2007 (where bringing back the jets, and not privatizing hydro were 2 of the 5 planks), the alternative is not much different... Take a glance at the PCs website right now. They promise to invest MORE in healthcare, MORE in education, MORE to the environment, MORE resources to fight crime, MORE for urban infrastructure... And yet, they will somehow also cut taxes for businesses, families, seniors? Rigggghhhhhht...
IMO, we can't allow ourselves to suck on other provinces tits for equalization payments when we have the ability to stand on our own two feet. It's important for the essentials to be maintained, but that does not mean that one shuts out the opportunity to better one's self in life. I was always taught the sense of accomplishment that you feel when you earn your own money, instead of relying on others to pay your way in life. If we have the opportunity to stand on our own two feet, as a province, why would we let that go to waste?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #417  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2010, 12:26 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTD View Post
How about some additional incentives to entice companies to explore for potential untapped resources? And once discovered, perhaps more incentives to start extraction? Remember the saying "it takes money to make money"? It might take some short-term pain in order to achieve the long-term gain that would follow. I'm a supporter of that. I'm sure that other jurisdictions out there had a hand in kick-starting their natural resource industries somehow, and have reaped the rewards that follow.

IMO, we can't allow ourselves to suck on other provinces tits for equalization payments when we have the ability to stand on our own two feet. It's important for the essentials to be maintained, but that does not mean that one shuts out the opportunity to better one's self in life. I was always taught the sense of accomplishment that you feel when you earn your own money, instead of relying on others to pay your way in life. If we have the opportunity to stand on our own two feet, as a province, why would we let that go to waste?
For your first point, I find it highly contradictory. The NDP are socialist because of their subsidies to families etc, but the PC will come in and subsidize private industry, and you find that acceptable? You argue for a business friendly environment, and letting the market work - then, you argue that we might need to subsidize exploration AND exploitation of natural resources?

And again, my original question was about what specific policies you (and others) feel would significantly impact our province's economic growth/turn us into a have province/encourage investment, etc... "Incentives" for businesses sounds very vague to me, and is not policy (at least not a policy consistent with conservative principles...)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #418  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2010, 12:40 AM
RTD RTD is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdog View Post
For your first point, I find it highly contradictory. The NDP are socialist because of their subsidies to families etc, but the PC will come in and subsidize private industry, and you find that acceptable? You argue for a business friendly environment, and letting the market work - then, you argue that we might need to subsidize exploration AND exploitation of natural resources?

And again, my original question was about what specific policies you (and others) feel would significantly impact our province's economic growth/turn us into a have province/encourage investment, etc... "Incentives" for businesses sounds very vague to me, and is not policy (at least not a policy consistent with conservative principles...)
You are right, it is contradictory; I realize that now. And I probably didn't set out my statement in a more politically correct manner as I should have. Regardless, there are some things that subsidies don't do much to enhance our provincial economy (sports teams, welfare for able-bodied workers, etc.). while others are indeed worthwhile (education, health care, infrastructure, etc.) Now I am no politician, and while I don't have any detailed definition of "subsidies", but rather in observations of other regions who have attracted investors for natural resource extraction, am smart enough to realize that there are ways to achieve this, yes even here in have-not Manitoba, and no longer fall victim to the "no we can't" mentality.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #419  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2011, 2:35 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,886
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Stonewall's kilns crumble
Frost damage is getting worse
By: Bill Redekop / Open Road
Posted: 01/31/2011 1:00 AM

STONEWALL -- The pyramids of Stonewall are in trouble.
The limestone kilns that mark the town's heritage, that are perfectly framed when you look north down Stonewall's Main Street, are developing deep frost cracks and are increasingly at risk of falling.
The problem is the price tag to stabilize them -- nearly $1 million. "They would throw us all out of office" if councillors approved that kind of expenditure, Coun. Walter Badger, in charge of heritage, said recently.
Local historian Allan Webb is one of the most ardent fans for preserving the kilns.
"They're not going to fall down tomorrow but we need to do something in the next couple years because the frost damage is getting worse," Webb said on a recent tour. The freezing and thawing of water seepage is widening the cracks.
Webb's family dates back 125 years in the Stonewall area. He is the fourth generation to work at the quarry, if you include the horse-drawn tours he gives in summer. His great grandfather, Samuel Webb, worked there in 1901, and his grandfather tended up to 14 horses used to haul stone. His father broke rock with a sledge hammer for one year.
"The kilns are the symbol of the town and a big part of its heritage," said Webb.
A steam-engine-powered derrick lifted rock into the kilns. "They'd dump the rock in the top just like putting it down a chimney," he said.
Wood fire processed the limestone. The quarry kept 1,000 cords of wood on hand at all times, and went through 10 cords a day. That gave farmers extra income by cutting down their poplar woodlots.
"Until the 1940s, everyone but the well-off heated and cooked with wood," said Webb.
Fire separated out the carbon dioxide (limestone is calcium carbonate) and left behind a powder called quicklime. Quicklime had many uses including disinfecting outhouses -- the prevailing sewage system at the time -- and barns. The quicklime was also used to manufacture products like paint, whitewash, masonry mortar and plaster. Many farmers whitewashed their interior barn walls to increase visibility when working by kerosene lantern.
The three kilns remaining in Quarry Park could produce six to 10 tonnes of quicklime per day.
Limestone was used in construction. Many small buildings in Stonewall are made of local limestone including the town hall, built in 1912, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce building (1912), and the post office (1914). "The rock is on the soft side (unlike tyndall) so you don't want to go over three stories with it," Webb explained.
The quarries are on the shallow reef of the inland sea that covered Manitoba 450 million years ago. Limestone was created by the natural cementing of the crustacean armours of small sea creatures. Lake Agassiz dumped about 10 feet of clay on top of the limestone.
The quarry closed in 1967 due to drop in demand and supply. Today, the cluster of kilns "is the best example of their kind still standing all in one place," said Webb. They are Stonewall's "pyramids," he said.
Coun. Badger said the town has too many big, expensive projects right now like expansion of its lagoon, repairs to its water and sewer lines, and the $7 million heritage centre.
Webb hopes the town will set aside money for a consultant's report. Then private money will have to be found, he said. "The problem is the kilns don't generate any revenue," he said.
"On the bright side, the kilns have lasted for 100 years and haven't fallen over yet."

bill.redekop@freepress.mb.ca
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 31, 2011 A2

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/loc...114919654.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #420  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2011, 12:47 AM
The Bess The Bess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 854
link to the NICO project near Saskatoon

www.infomine.com/index/pr/Pa938754.PDF

Last edited by 1ajs; Feb 5, 2011 at 1:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.