Quote:
Originally Posted by EastSideHBG
Nice pics, Chris! I have friends that own a townhouse in the group you can see in your second pic, and they rent it out. I haven't talked to them in a few years so they may have sold it, though.
I think 6th and Reily is the best bet. There is a lot of room, it would help push DT outward, that whole immediate area is garbage and like you guys said, it would be a nice shot in the arm for the area. Also, I always thought it was cool how DT was divided into two distinct districts, and I like the idea of having this fed bldg. in the "gov't side of town".
|
Thanks, EastSideHBG, glad you liked the pics. I'm working on more in the very near future, as there has been significant advancement on the Harrisburg U Tower, downtown.
Yes, the ability to extend the downtown [DT] to the north around 7th and 6th Streets, seems to be in the works. Frankly, there are still HUGE tracks of available land in that area, if you clear off some isolated residences and abandoned/run-down structures. Speaking specifically about the courthouse, the federal judges are the ones really pushing the courthouse to be DT, but I think they're going to lose this fight. They have the great misfortune of having US Rep. Tim Holden on the House Committee which oversees GSA's budget. Ah well, let them have their tantrum.
YoungGun made a point, in the previous post, about the core of Harrisburg becoming a rather large Central Business District [CBD], with housing limited to the fringes of the City. I've thought that myself, but there is always another option: more condos and apartments in the CBD!! I still think we're a good 10 or 15 years from that kind of development, but I do believe it will happen. The thing preventing that right now, is, imho, the availability of land in the City [hence the option to build dwellings where it is less expensive] and the obstinate refusal of many suburbanites to actually want to live in the CBD. One will change fairly quickly [the land availability], the other, not nearly so, but it will, following the lack of land "close in" on which to build more suburbia.