HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:17 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
I think Planning Committee's big realization this term was that the Official Plan rules for increased heights were very flexible so the 4-6 storey limits on main streets and other areas could easily argued to be increased under the criteria in the plan... the new OP intends to remedy this concern. Development review staff has been taking heat for recommending approval of higher buildings, but councillors upset about this issue could have brought motions to at any time during their term to change this part of the plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:35 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
I think Planning Committee's big realization this term was that the Official Plan rules for increased heights were very flexible so the 4-6 storey limits on main streets and other areas could easily argued to be increased under the criteria in the plan... the new OP intends to remedy this concern. Development review staff has been taking heat for recommending approval of higher buildings, but councillors upset about this issue could have brought motions to at any time during their term to change this part of the plan.
I don't think that many community associations realize that this changed in December but applications submitted before that could argue that flexibility angle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 12:12 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Councillor Holmes was on Ottawa Morning today
http://www.cbc.ca/player/AudioMobile...ID/2436101943/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 12:32 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
I think Planning Committee's big realization this term was that the Official Plan rules for increased heights were very flexible so the 4-6 storey limits on main streets and other areas could easily argued to be increased under the criteria in the plan... the new OP intends to remedy this concern. Development review staff has been taking heat for recommending approval of higher buildings, but councillors upset about this issue could have brought motions to at any time during their term to change this part of the plan.
Strictly speaking that's true, but every time I've ever heard City staff speak on such issues they prefer to heavily imply that such changes should be considered only when the OP is reviewed. Let's just say that any councillor who had the temerity to suggest that the OP be amended between reviews to tighten up the rules would quite likely have been stonewalled.
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 2:05 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
^Fair point... I looked at the OPAs in this term of Council and could only see 6 outside the OP review that weren't site specific or secondary plan related. And most of those 6 were technical amendments like changing the policy on newspaper notification, correcting errors, or removing redundant policies.

http://ottawa.ca/en/official-plan-0/...-official-plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2014, 12:25 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 8:08 PM
gjhall's Avatar
gjhall gjhall is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
I think Planning Committee's big realization this term was that the Official Plan rules for increased heights were very flexible so the 4-6 storey limits on main streets and other areas could easily argued to be increased under the criteria in the plan... the new OP intends to remedy this concern. Development review staff has been taking heat for recommending approval of higher buildings, but councillors upset about this issue could have brought motions to at any time during their term to change this part of the plan.
The other issue was that 4-6 storeys wasn't defined in the OP at all, whereas "midrise" was defined as 4-9 storeys, which gave an easy avenue to anyone to increase height form 4-6 to 9. There was also an issue with providing ranges instead of maximums, as it implied a range rather than specific height was acceptable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2014, 2:57 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Ken Gray: Abolish The Planning Department
http://bulldogottawa.com/abolish-the...ng-department/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2014, 3:21 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 860
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Ken Gray: Abolish The Planning Department
http://bulldogottawa.com/abolish-the...ng-department/
Typical Ken Gray. Points out something he views as a problem (lack of consultation & rubber stamping, two things that are sometimes true) but doesn't really provide a realistic solution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2014, 4:28 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
and don't forget: all the while pinning it on someone else; in this case, the anonymous "friend."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2014, 6:43 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
New planning applications signs will have renders and plainer language.

There will be a pilot project in Capital Ward where community associations will be invited to pre-application meetings.

@CarysMills now
To be determined this summer is how secret those meetings will be, to strike balance between developer and community needs #ottcity #ottnews

here are the new signs


https://twitter.com/CarysMills/statu...39946556620800
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2014, 7:56 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
City to make planning information and consultations clearer, more transparent
23 June 2014
http://ottawa.ca/en/news/city-make-p...re-transparent

News Release
Ottawa – Better development signage, the use of plain language, easier-to-use development reports, and a pilot project to improve community engagement were the four new initiatives unveiled today by Mayor Jim Watson and Councillor Peter Hume, Chair of the City’s Planning Committee.

The goal of the initiatives is to make City planning information and consultations clearer, easier to understand, and more transparent.

“At our Planning Summit in 2012, we made a commitment to improve the flow of information,” said Mayor Jim Watson. “Councillor Hume and City Planning and Growth Management staff are following through by making planning information and processes simpler and easier to understand, while also moving to improve public engagement.”

The changes to the information and communication tools include:

Development street signs will be revamped to provide residents with greater clarity on what exactly to expect from the development application proposal. The sign will feature plainer language and a street-level image of the proposal (where applicable).
Plain language will be used to make information easier to understand on matters of planning policy and proposed development applications.
A report template has been designed to make it easier to find and contact the planner on the file for public feedback. It will also link to relevant documentation and will feature a one-page data sheet that gives a thumbnail overview of the application.
The fourth initiative that is being introduced is a one-year pilot project in Capital Ward that allows registered Community Associations to participate in pre-application consultations meetings between developers and City planners.

“The pilot project employs community engagement earlier in the process, before the development application is even officially made,” said Councillor Hume. “This promising initiative makes the process more transparent, allowing earlier communication with the community and builds awareness of the planning process.”

Pre-application meetings are required before a formal application is filed. The meeting covers the necessary studies and plans that are required to be in the final submission, along with the relevant planning policies that application must adhere to.

The one-year pilot will start in August of this year. A report to Planning Committee on its results will be tabled next summer. Further information will be communicated to affected Capital Ward community organizations later this summer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 1:30 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Developers to get ambassadors within planning department
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...ing-department
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2015, 2:24 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Developers to get ambassadors within planning department
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...ing-department
Developers to get ambassadors within planning department

Matthew Pearson, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 1, 2015, Last Updated: June 1, 2015 6:57 PM EDT


The city is defending a new initiative that will give private developers an ambassador within the planning department.

Staff members were recruited this spring to act as “client relationship leaders” — a fancy bureaucratic term for a role that appears to be equal parts problem solver, facilitator and concierge.

“The CRL is expected to discern what the issues are, communicate with the file lead, client, and management to determine next steps and what possible solutions may exist in order to bring a resolution,” says a document distributed to staff who work in the planning department.

In some cases, the CRL will be able to override decisions by project managers or the city staff member previously tasked with overseeing a particular planning file.

The purpose, says Lee Ann Snedden, acting head of development review services, is to help the planning department “understand and become a little bit more knowledgeable about what our clients’ needs are” so the department can identify gaps in service and possible improvements.

But the only “clients”, at this point, are developers, she said.

If the pilot program goes well, the city might explore ways to roll out a similar program for other stakeholders, such as residents and community associations. But that wouldn’t be until the fall or early next year.

Some question the need for such an initiative.

“I don’t know what problem this solves,” said Michael Powell, president of the Dalhousie Community Association.

It’s never been his impression that developers and city staff have a problem communicating with each other, he said, adding that planners assigned to oversee particular applications are often generous with their time.

Powell also wondered whether this new approach is beneficial when some residents already believe that the relationship between city officials and developers is too cosy. “From an optics perspective, this probably isn’t helpful,” he said.

But the chair of the planning department defended the new program.

The process to move an application through the city’s planning department is cumbersome and difficult, Jan Harder says, and sometimes departments aren’t on the same page.

Planning staff will now have a chance to take on a leadership role and be the one person at city hall a developer can call when they have questions, instead of having to call around to several departments in search of answers.

As for residents and community associations, they won’t be left in the lurch, Harder says.

“The communities have ambassadors and they’re called councillors,” she said, adding the relationship between community associations and the city is strong.

“The No. 1 goal here is customer service and moving applications through the system in a timely fashion,” Harder said.

Snedden said 20 staff members are receiving training in managing relationships, serving clients, problem solving and facilitation. Each will be matched with a single developer later this month.

They didn’t need to be planners or engineers in order to selected, according to the recruiting material distributed to staff.

“You don’t have to have any specific knowledge of planning or of the developer, just an interest in developing relationships with our clients and resolving issues,” the document says.

In addition to the training, ambassadors selected to participate will be supported by managers through regular office hours and will share tactics among each other.

Snedden said she’s not concerned that the new program could create cheerleaders within the department who will lobby hard for the developer he or she is assigned to.

“I don’t believe that they would become an advocate for the developer. That’s not the expectation or the role that the staff will play,” she said. “It is really to focus on understanding client needs, where there are issues of consistency that we may identify or gaps in service.”

There is no budget for the program. The staff members selected to participate are volunteers, though they will be volunteering on work time, meaning they will have a reduced workload to accommodate the time needed for the program, Snedden said.

“The idea of this program is really to improve services, so I do believe, from a taxpayers’ perspective, this is all about efficiencies,” she said.

mpearson@ottawacitizen.com
twitter.com/mpearson78

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...ing-department
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2015, 2:25 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,333
McKenney, community associations oppose new planning ambassador program

Matthew Pearson, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 4, 2015, Last Updated: June 4, 2015 6:40 PM EDT


Councillors and community associations are speaking out against a new city initiative that will give private developers an ambassador within the planning department.

As the Citizen reported Monday, 20 staff members in the planning department have been recruited to act as “client relationship leaders” — a role that appears to be equal parts problem solver, facilitator and concierge.

“The CRL is expected to discern what the issues are, communicate with the file lead, client, and management to determine next steps and what possible solutions may exist in order to bring a resolution,” says a document distributed to staff.

In some cases, the CRL will be able to override decisions by project managers or the city staff member who was previously overseeing a particular planning file.

Somerset Coun. Catherine McKenney posted a statement on her website Wednesday opposing the program and suggested that the city should “balance the scale for local communities living with increased development pressure and complicated zoning regulations.”

“What is needed is an ambassador program for communities,” according to McKenney’s statement, adding that the city should provide “support for community associations and residents who do not have the experience, resources, or expertise to navigate the complex planning process or understand the nuances” of the city’s official planning documents.

Kitchissippi Coun. Jeff Leiper said Thursday he shares many of McKenney’s concerns and hopes there will be an opportunity to ask questions about the new program at Tuesday’s planning committee.

“I’m not going to assume the worst, but given the strong reaction from the community, it’s absolutely incumbent on us right now to find out what this is actually is and if, after an opportunity to pose questions and really dig into what this program is, we determine, as councillors, that there is something we feel is inappropriate, to push back against that,” Leiper said.

He added he would have hoped that any new initiative within the department would be directed to communities.

The acting head of development review services, Lee Ann Snedden, defended the program earlier this week, saying the purpose is to help the planning department “understand and become a little bit more knowledgeable about what our clients’ needs are” so the department can identify gaps in service and possible improvements.

But, she added, the only “clients,” at this point, are developers.

If the pilot program goes well, the city might explore ways to roll out a similar program for other stakeholders, such as residents and community associations, but that wouldn’t be until the fall or early next year.

The launch of the new program does not appear to be sitting well with community associations from across the city.

“This speaks to the current attitude in the planning department at city hall – that they work for the developers,” according to a joint statement signed by Chad Rollins (president of Action Sandy Hill), Liz Bernstein (president of the Lowertown Community Association) and John Dance (president of the Ottawa East Community Association).

“Already developers are on a first name basis with city planners; they meet regularly and have informal chats about how different proposals should be crafted. Meanwhile, residents are left in the dark until the last minute, their voices are largely ignored and the city repeatedly shows its preference for development, whether good or bad, at the expense of the community.”

The community groups opined: “This culture needs to change.”

Kanata Beaverbrook Community Association president Neil Thomson said in a letter to the Citizen that the program “puts communities on notice that the City has now tilted the planning process entirely in favour of developers.”

Thomson added whatever goodwill previously existed between community associations and the city “has been wiped out by not only this proposal, but the mindset that thought that this was the right direction for City planning.”

Sheila Perry, the liaison for planning and zoning issues for Ottawa’s Federation of Community Associations, said she wasn’t completely clear about the program is all about, but noted its focus on developers.

“My question is, where does the community fit? And I think all community associations are going to be asking that,” Perry said.

Barrhaven Coun. Jan Harder, who chairs the city’s planning committee, wasn’t available for comment on Thursday, but earlier in the week defended the program.

“The No. 1 goal here is customer service and moving applications through the system in a timely fashion,” Harder said Monday.

mpearson@ottawacitizen.com
twitter.com/mpearson78

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...ssador-program
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2015, 2:27 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,333
Quote:
“What is needed is an ambassador program for communities,” according to McKenney’s statement
Is that not exactly what the elected councillor's job is??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2015, 2:41 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,333
A memo about those new planning ambassadors

Matthew Pearson, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 5, 2015, Last Updated: June 5, 2015 11:54 AM EDT


Several days after the Citizen first reported on a new pilot project that will give private developers an ambassador within the planning department, Michael Mizzi, the acting general manager of planning a growth management, sent a memo to Mayor Jim Watson and councillors on Thursday (see below).

Reaction to news of the program has been strong, with numerous community associations and city councillors speaking out against it.

The Mizzi memo seems to be an attempt to address some of that community pushback by highlighting the “concerted efforts Planning and Growth Management has undertaken in the last two years towards improving the service to, and the ways in which we interact, with residents and community groups.”

I’ll let you read the memo and decide for yourself, but I still find myself a bit surprised a department that claims to have made such efforts to improve service for residents and community groups didn’t think the optics of a new program like this weren’t a bit off in the first place.

Here’s the memo.

Quote:
MEMO/NOTE DE SERVICE

This memorandum is to advise that the Planning and Growth Management’s Development Review Services Branch is launching a new internal pilot program in our continuing effort to improve service. The Client Relationship Leader pilot program will improve the efficiency and focus of operations. This program will:

• Empower staff to provide more leadership on issues;
• Identify gaps in procedures and information sharing;
• Ensure consistent application of policies;
• Improve timelines for application processing;
• Contribute to succession planning;
• Improve employee engagement;
• Strengthen intradepartmental communications; and
• Increase capacity to resolve issues within the branch.

Under the pilot program, a number of staff from Development Review Services have volunteered to become Client Relationship Leaders in addition to their regular responsibilities. These staff will be matched with a development industry representative to provide one point of contact for addressing issues and inquiries. Through this model, we are ensuring that we are building staff expertise, undertaking quality assurance, and ensuring that the right level of staff is addressing the issue at hand. An efficient, timely and transparent development approval process is important for Ottawa’s competitive edge and quality of life.

This program is derived from the City’s service promise agenda. Further to this, research for this pilot program included the examination of strategies used by companies recognized for their excellent client service.

The pilot will include training and will commence at the end of this month. The pilot will &e monitored continually, and it will be evaluated within six months.

This initiative compliments the concerted efforts Planning and Growth Management has undertaken in the last two years towards improving the service to, and the ways in which we interact, with residents and community groups. Last year’s initiatives included:

• Implementing a plain language guideline for all planning documents;
• Improving the quality of development review staff reports, including providing Council with a greater understanding of public consultation results;
• Increasing the transparency of the Urban Design Review Panel;
• Renewing planning-related web content on Ottawa.ca from a resident’s perspective;
• Piloting a program on pre9application consultations in Ward 17; and
• Launching the award winning new development signage which improved delivery of information to residents.

Staff are in contact with cities across Canada to learn best practices and are committed to a culture that values all perspectives. This will compliment work underway this year to reinvigorate the popular Planning Primer Program, improve all written communications to residents (the subject of a presentation at Planning Committee on May 12, 2015 on our revised circulation packages for development applications) and a new departmental e-newsletter called Connections.

If you have any questions, please contact Lee Ann Snedden, Acting Chief, Development Review Services at LeeAnn.Snedden@ottawa.ca or extension 25779.

Original signed by:
Michael Mizzi
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...ng-ambassadors
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2015, 6:51 PM
Buggys Buggys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 659
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post


Is that not exactly what the elected councillor's job is??
Elected councillors speak for developers and businesses in their area, in addition to the residents, don't they?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2015, 10:49 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Committee to review Planning and Growth Management Work Plan at workshop meeting
June 9, 2015
Media Advisory
Ottawa - The City’s Planning Committee will be meeting with the Planning and Growth Management team to review the department’s 2015-2018 work plan. The meeting will provide Committee members with an opportunity to prioritize work items and identify any gaps.

Date: Monday, June 15
Time: 11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Location: Ottawa City Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West
Festival Plaza Control Room
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2015, 1:16 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggys View Post
Elected councillors speak for developers and businesses in their area, in addition to the residents, don't they?
Elected Councillors speak on behalf of the voters who elected them, so if the owners of the development companies and the local businesses reside in that ward, then yes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:59 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.