Quote:
At a preapplication conference in 2015, the Bureau of Development Services informed the developer of a 75-foot height limit in the NW 13th Avenue Historic District.
|
Why would they have done that? The height limit is 175'.
Quote:
In an April 2016 Design Advice Review session, Hollister learned that the height limit would instead be 100 feet.
|
Again, why would that have happened? The height limit is 175'. These aren't numbers that are made up on a whim.
Quote:
The issue boils down to height. Pearl East was approved at 96 feet, just under the 100-foot limit.
|
To hammer this point home, the height limit is 175'.
Quote:
The five-story Wieden+Kennedy building was listed as 122 feet though it is only 58 feet according to highrises.com.
|
It's very unlikely that a 5 story office building, converted from a warehouse, is only 58' tall.
Quote:
The seven-story Irving Street Lofts is 89 feet tall according
|
The Irving Streets Lofts are also a warehouse conversion. Given that the units have ceilings ranging from 11' to14', the building is almost certainly taller than 89'.
Quote:
The bigger problem with allowing substantially greater building heights in a historic district is creating market pressures that encourage demolitions. If a one-story structure can be replaced by a tower, property owners may realize a huge gain in value.
|
This isn't how the process works. The demolition of a contributing resource in the 13th Avenue Historic District, or any other district in the city, requires City Council approval. The chances of getting it are slim to none.
Quote:
As for the absence of board review of a letter she wrote in support of Pearl East
|
She didn't draft the letter; another committee member did (though not a member of PDNA, I happened to be at the meeting where the committee discussed Pearl East). And in general the article's insinuations about Patricia Gardner are slimy in the extreme.