HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6341  
Old Posted: Today, 12:26 AM
ByeByeBaby's Avatar
ByeByeBaby ByeByeBaby is offline
Crunchin' the numbers.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: T2R, YYC, 403, CA-AB.
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan83 View Post
In your opinion which ones would this include?
Higher ridership I already talked about; four of the six corridors would have higher ridership. In terms of redevelopment potential, 17th Ave SE, 16 Ave N and Centre St N all have a strong grid structure, with plenty of places for intensification. The South Crosstown serves the Currie Barracks which is redeveloping, as well as the intensification around Heritage and MRU that are already underway, and Quarry Park for what that's worth. The SETWAY is the only one with so many permanent or near-permanent restrictions; landfills, railroads, fertilizer stacks, contaminated soil, sewage treatment plants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6342  
Old Posted: Today, 12:34 AM
UofC.engineer's Avatar
UofC.engineer UofC.engineer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by ByeByeBaby View Post
Sure.

Centre Street Transitway: 2.1M increase
North Crosstown BRT: 2M increase
South Crosstown BRT: 1.7M increase
Southwest Transitway: 1.3M increase
Southeast Transitway: 1.2M increase
17th Ave SE Transitway: 500K increase
West Campus Mobility: 200K increase

Looks to me like there are four projects with higher ridership than the SE transitway, two of them with almost double the ridership.

It's also worth noting that the SETWAY has almost double the capital cost of the other projects. Not individually -- double the cost of all six of them added together.

I'm having a hard time figuring out why it isn't a slam dunk case to spend $120M to get 2.1 million more riders, or $40M to get 1.3 million more riders, rather than $642M to get 1.2 million.
Yes! It's a ridership increase in the corridor, very good, excellent work.


Centre Street Transitway: Improved travel time and more buses will increase ridership in the northern communities, it's an excellent improvement.

North Crosstown BRT: Students traveling from SAIT and UofC to the NE will have their transit ride time cut down significantly and won't have to take the train through DT, it's an excellent improvement.

SW Transitway: People living in the southfour(Oakridge,Paliser,Cederbrae,Braeside) won't have to pack into C-train cars anymore and travel times to DT will improve, it's an excellent improvement.

SE Transitway: Added bus capacity and frequency along with shorter travel time will increase ridership, its an excellent improvement.

West Campus Mobility: One word..."Gondola". It's an excellent improvement.

SETWAY: People who take deerfoot everyday abandon their fucking cars and take transit for the first time. They might end up actually liking having an extra few minutes of the day to sit down and reflect on the days events instead of grinding through traffic.

I'll state it again "The SETWAY will take more cars off the road than any other transit project."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Mountain View Post
In fact I would posture that you will see next to no change in vehicle volumes in the SE if the SETWAY goes ahead.
No. I have a hard time believing people would rather pay $500 a month for a parking stall in DT plus a brutal commute to and from the deep SE everyday than take a 20-25 min bus ride. If that was the case the south line would be empty everyday, so my response is: No. I just don't buy it buddy!

Last edited by UofC.engineer; Today at 12:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6343  
Old Posted: Today, 12:35 AM
UofC.engineer's Avatar
UofC.engineer UofC.engineer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 270
Everyone knows that report is BS. That's all I have to say.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:59 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.