HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    111 West 57th Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1521  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2016, 8:26 AM
Guiltyspark's Avatar
Guiltyspark Guiltyspark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Yeah but 111's footprint has got to be less than a quarter of any of the classic downtown towers.
Maybe the footprint, the the main bulk of those old towers are incredibly thin.
__________________
Ramses can suck it. This is my world, my age, and those ancient people are dead.
     
     
  #1522  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2016, 4:54 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
And these thin residential towers are being built with the express purpose of putting units higher up. Higher units, better views. Better views, more money. It's literally the highest and best use of that land, what brings in the most bucks. It's whey so few places can support such towers, and only a select few places will. In either case, it will be an improvement on the skyline, which will have a variety of new skyline elements redefining New York for the next century.


The 57th Street gang...


__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1523  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2016, 3:14 PM
1Boston's Avatar
1Boston 1Boston is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 370





Tumblr Link

What once was, ca. 1916
     
     
  #1524  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2016, 3:14 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840

Credit: walpole
     
     
  #1525  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2016, 12:36 PM
punchydj punchydj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 106
Hi guys!

There is the construction progress during the year 2015:

Video Link


Thank you!!!
     
     
  #1526  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 3:12 PM
punchydj punchydj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 106
Hi guys!

There is the progress during the month of January.

Video Link


Thank you!!!
     
     
  #1527  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 11:08 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Where did the 1,495 figure come from?
     
     
  #1528  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:29 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1529  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2016, 3:40 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
From yesterday.







Looks like the tower is about to take off. I am surprised there was no piling or any excavation more than about 10 ft done. Can somebody explain how a 1400 ft super slim tower be constructed without deep foundation?
     
     
  #1530  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2016, 4:29 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Sweet baby, it's ready to rise....


http://therealdeal.com/2016/02/10/le...-west-57th-st/

Lender Apollo defends economics of 111 West 57th St.


February 10, 2016
By Katherine Clarke


Quote:
...Apollo provided a $325 million mezzanine loan for the West 57th Street project last year, as part of a $725 million financing which also comprised a $400 million first mortgage loan from AIG.

The developers are projecting a sellout of $1.45 billion for 65 apartments, according to the offering plan, which was approved by the New York Attorney General in October. The priciest condo is asking $58 million, or $8,179 per foot. A spokesperson for JDS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1531  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 12:39 AM
Welcome2Boise's Avatar
Welcome2Boise Welcome2Boise is offline
Certified Idahoan
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post
Looks like the tower is about to take off. I am surprised there was no piling or any excavation more than about 10 ft done. Can somebody explain how a 1400 ft super slim tower be constructed without deep foundation?
Parts of Manhattan have very shallow bedrock. Once you hit it, you need not dig further unless you are building out basement space. I'm just assuming this is one of those spots. But I don't have a geological map handy to prove my point.
     
     
  #1532  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 3:20 AM
Citylover94 Citylover94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welcome2Boise View Post
Parts of Manhattan have very shallow bedrock. Once you hit it, you need not dig further unless you are building out basement space. I'm just assuming this is one of those spots. But I don't have a geological map handy to prove my point.
That is exactly what has to be the case because by contrast the new Four Seasons tower in Boston which will only be 755' will have a 160' deep foundation to reach the bedrock below it.
     
     
  #1533  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 4:00 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welcome2Boise View Post
Parts of Manhattan have very shallow bedrock. Once you hit it, you need not dig further unless you are building out basement space. I'm just assuming this is one of those spots. But I don't have a geological map handy to prove my point.

Correct, bedrock is shallow along W 57th street but the tower does not need to be anchored to resist vertical wind shear force?
     
     
  #1534  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 6:58 PM
Citylover94 Citylover94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 255
You don't have to blast into bedrock to anchor the tower to it depending on the type of foundation used it isn't usually necessary to dig into the bedrock because you can anchor a tower to bedrock without doing that. In some cases some buildings even supertall skyscrapers don't even go to bedrock. For example the Petronas towers use a special type of piling that is made to reach almost to bedrock between 60 and 100 feet beneath the building and uses friction to anchor the building the piles extend from a large concrete raft foundation structure that anchors the building and the two foundation types work together to allow the building to resist wind and seismic stresses on the building.

In this case they will be able to anchor the building to bedrock. The above just shows that there is no risk to the tower by not going deeper and the only reasons to go deeper are in situations like that described above where the bedrock is far below a building and there is not necessarily a need to anchor directly to bedrock. There are so many variables involved in what type of foundation and anchoring is used that until they start constructing that for this building I could not tell you how they will do it for this tower, but there is no risk of it falling so long as they have designed the structural support system correctly. Even then if there is an issue found later that could most likely be corrected at the time as has been done in the past with other buildings such as the Citigroup Center in New York and the John Hancock Building in Boston.
     
     
  #1535  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 7:03 PM
Welcome2Boise's Avatar
Welcome2Boise Welcome2Boise is offline
Certified Idahoan
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 168
Deleted, better answer above.
     
     
  #1536  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2016, 7:34 PM
Vortex11 Vortex11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 45
Is this website new, or has it been up a while?

http://111w57.com/
     
     
  #1537  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2016, 9:08 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
^ That website went online on March 2015.
     
     
  #1538  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2016, 12:58 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
That 1,495' figure keeps popping up. If true, that would be utterly amazing having two 1,500 footers so close to each other.

http://ny.curbed.com/archives/2015/1...7th_street.php

Absurdly Luxe Interiors Coming to 111 West 57th Street
Monday, December 28, 2015, by Zoe Rosenberg

Quote:
At about $8,000 per square foot, JDS Development Group and Property Market Group's 111 West 57th Street will be home to some of the most expensive residences in New York City. So of course the skinny supertall's interiors will reflect that staggering opulence. Other than the few renderings of the project's interiors that were revealed in early April, details surrounding its finishes have been scant. William Sofield, whose namesake firm is handling the building's interiors, sat down with Architectural Digest to chat about the "pornographically expensive" project, revealing a few more unknowns all while testing out some totally tone-deaf rhetoric (h/t LLNYC).
Quote:
[AD Interviewer]: What's the latest and greatest from Studio Sofield?

[William Sofield]: Our big project is 111 West 57th Street, the new needle building that's going up above Steinway Hall. SHoP is doing the architecture, and we're doing all the interiors. It's quite a production—about 1,495 feet high and 58 feet wide, so it's too thin to kill any of the trees in Central Park.

[AD Interviewer]: [reviewing drawings] This looks swank! I suppose the building is yet another pornographically expensive project?

WS: On a scale of one to over-the-top, it's over-the-top. I think the apartments will sell for something like $8,000 per square foot, which is roughly what the fabrics we specified cost.

[AD Interviewer]: Pity the vanishing middle class.

WS: I thought this was middle class!
     
     
  #1539  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2016, 4:27 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
This tower, 30 Hudson, and 340 Flatbush have to be the best projects going on right now. Arguably the most radical designs currently in this century for the area.

Quote:
[AD Interviewer]: Pity the vanishing middle class.


     
     
  #1540  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2016, 3:09 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
About that 1,495 ft height, we'll see...


http://therealdeal.com/2016/02/18/fi...t-57th-street/

First Look: Inside the sales gallery and model unit at 111 West 57th Street
JDS, PMG project has projected sellout of $1.45B






February 18, 2016
By Katherine Clarke














Quote:
JDS Development and Property Markets Group have managed to keep visuals of 111 West 57th Street, the ultra-skinny tower at the Steinway building on Billionaires’ Row, largely under wraps, aside from a couple of hand-picked renderings doled out to the press.

But prospective buyers can finally get a glimpse at what the pricey apartments will actually look like, thanks to a series of images of the building’s sales gallery and model unit spotted by The Real Deal via a tipster.

The images were promptly removed from the website of photographer Evan Joseph once the developers were reached for comment, but TRD took screen shots. The images give a first look at the building’s luxe finishes, including its grand onyx bathtubs, dark wood kitchens and sweeping staircases.
The developers declined to comment on the images, saying that sales were yet to formally kick off at the building.

JDS and PMG are projecting a sellout of $1.45 billion for 65 apartments, according to the offering plan, which was approved by the New York Attorney General in October. The priciest condo currently in the offering plan is asking $58 million, or $8,179 per foot.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.