HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2007, 2:41 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
South Waterfront Block 43 | Dead

Tentative Schedule of Cases for
Design Commission

3. LU 07-146222 DA Abigail Fowle, 503-823-0624
Applicant: Paul Jeffreys, SERA ARCHITECTS
Site address: 0601 SW Abernethy St
Design Advice for a mixed-use development on Block 43 of South Waterfront.

4. LU 07-151174 DA Kara Fioravanti, 503-823-5892
Applicant: Bruce Brown, GBD ARCHITECTS
Site address: Block bounded by SW Bond Ln, Abernathy and River Pkwy
Design Advice Request for Block 42 in South Waterfront. The proposal is for a 250' tall tower atop a varied podium.
The building wil house approximately 273 apartments and ground level retail, with 3 levels of underground parking.
Parking and loading access will be from Abernathy.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2007, 3:22 PM
Snowden352's Avatar
Snowden352 Snowden352 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 236
"The building wil house approximately 273 apartments." I don't know why, but I'm very amused by this. (Well, I know why I'm amused...)
__________________
"Δεν ελπίζω τίποτε. Δεν φοβούμαι τίποτε. Είμαι λεύτερος"

Last edited by Snowden352; Aug 10, 2007 at 3:22 PM. Reason: Emphasis, dammit!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2007, 6:41 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
Quote:
Tentative Schedule of Cases for
Design Commission

3. LU 07-146222 DA Abigail Fowle, 503-823-0624
Applicant: Paul Jeffreys, SERA ARCHITECTS
Site address: 0601 SW Abernethy St
Design Advice for a mixed-use development on Block 43 of South Waterfront.

4. LU 07-151174 DA Kara Fioravanti, 503-823-5892
Applicant: Bruce Brown, GBD ARCHITECTS
Site address: Block bounded by SW Bond Ln, Abernathy and River Pkwy
Design Advice Request for Block 42 in South Waterfront. The proposal is for a 250' tall tower atop a varied podium.
The building wil house approximately 273 apartments and ground level retail, with 3 levels of underground parking.
Parking and loading access will be from Abernathy.
where did you find that?
heres the map in case anyone forgets the location
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2007, 12:47 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,788
isn't block 43 the one that tworivers was hinting about last week?
and 42 - i thought that was prometheus, but i could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2007, 4:48 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
Quote:
isn't block 43 the one that tworivers was hinting about last week?
Yes: Sera. I'll try to get a render asap.

And yeah, I too thought 42 was Prometheus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2007, 9:16 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
It seems like all of a sudden renderings and news about southwaterfront are starting to come out fast and furious.

block 43 MORE ABOVE GROUND PARKING http://www.portlandonline.com/bds/in...166009&c=42263

Proposal:
The applicant seeks design advice for a 22-story mixed-use development on Block 43 in the South Waterfront District. The design includes a full block 4-story podium consisting of ground level commercial uses, 3 levels of above grade parking on floors 2-4 and some residential units. The tower portion will include only residential units. 295 residential units are proposed and approximately 300 parking spaces.

Potential Modifications to Ground Floor Windows and Ground Floor Active Uses along the SW Moody frontage, to Loading Forward Motion and to Drive Aisle and Parking Stall Minimum Dimensions.





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2007, 9:34 PM
NJD's Avatar
NJD NJD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 632
well, this one is sure to win architectural awards...

Ooooo, I like the MAX in the last render too!

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2007, 9:43 PM
Stepping Razor Stepping Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, via Portland
Posts: 30
Whoa, is it really going to be bright green? Very Wizard of Oz... Also hideous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2007, 10:27 PM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
It could be worse...at least its above 6 stories.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2007, 4:09 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
Yikes.

My friend at Sera told me they got a rotten egg to work with... but this doesn't look all that much improved. The street sandwiched between the two parking garages --the Alexan's and this one-- is going to be especially pleasant. One thing he mentioned, though, was that with the way they were designing the garage, it could be converted pretty easily to residential in some car-free future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2007, 4:13 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
I think they took the wrong definition of 'green' (architecture).



Quote:
One thing he mentioned, though, was that with the way they were designing the garage, it could be converted pretty easily to residential in some car-free future.
Hmm, that is very interesting. Sounds like they are minimizing the usage of parking ramps then and sticking with flat horizontal floor plates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2007, 3:24 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
SoWa: SERA and GBD both propose new towers

Tower designs take emerging district in different direction
As South Waterfront rises, SERA and GBD challenge sea of similarity with materials
POSTED: 06:00 AM PDT Monday, September 17, 2007
BY ALISON RYAN

Both proposed South Waterfront projects the Portland Design Commission saw Thursday are towers on podiums – but building type aside, the two hit different design goals.

SERA Architects’ 250-foot tower, planned for Block 43, puts 22 stories of ivory brick atop a four-story chocolate brick podium.

“This is actually a reaction to the amount of glazing that exists in South Waterfront,” architect Paul Jeffreys said. “We wanted a less commotional look.”

It’s a different materials reaction, Commissioner Andrew Jansky said during the design advice session, and one that may mark the beginning of a shift for South Waterfront.

“As the district develops, people’s attitudes change,” Jansky said. “And five years from now, people will say, ‘We don’t want it to look like this. We want to do something new.’”

Tower, podium and ground floor are conceived as distinct elements, with the vertical “stagger” of the tower window and balcony patterning playing against the horizontal “stagger” of the base, and a transparent ground floor pushing activity at the street level.

“Our direction is to really improve the streetscape, define the streetscape more clearly, and create a more iconic form for that base,” Jeffreys said.

On a neighboring South Waterfront block, GBD Architects’ designs for another 250-foot tower-and-podium building are also redefining the streetscape. The tower, with three subtly stepped levels of metal and glass, sits at mid-block. A collection of podiums of different heights edges the site to the east and west, creating small courtyard spaces to the north and south.

“Shifting the levels was a brilliant move,” Commissioner Lloyd Lindley said. “It added more corners, and an offset in there.”

The tower is primarily glass – the same, or perhaps a little lighter, as used in the district’s Meriwether condominium towers – and the podiums are planned as white panels.

“What we want to do is make a nice transition, in a different way, to the other side of South Waterfront,” architect Steve Domreis said.

The two buildings are the latest in a wave of South Waterfront work that’s appeared before commissioners recently. Ankrom Moisan’s designs for retirement community Mirabella and a two-building apartment project on Block 46 arrived in July and August, respectively. The Alexan, a 22-story apartment building, is under-construction on the site bordering the SERA-designed Block 43.

Contextually, both design teams said, South Waterfront is ever-shifting.

“It’s really a guessing game of what things are going on around you,” SERA’s Jeffreys said.

“Every time back, we have more context to design to,” GBD’s Domreis said.

SERA and GBD are both moving in the right direction with their designs, commissioners said.

And both designs, they said, try something different – massing and podium treatment for GBD, materials and streetscape activity for SERA – in a sea of similarity.

“My personal feeling is that a lot of these buildings are starting to look the same,” Jansky said.
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...SERA-and-GBD-c
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2007, 7:43 PM
Sioux612's Avatar
Sioux612 Sioux612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 539
Any renderings?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2007, 4:29 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
The GBD tower, from the DJC website:



Block 43 Sera renderings have been posted here before in one of the SoWa threads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2007, 4:48 AM
Sioux612's Avatar
Sioux612 Sioux612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 539
Block 43:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2007, 6:02 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,782
they both look a bit uninspiring and boring...I guess the bigger the firm, the more boring the work...which is why I only really want to work for small firms.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2007, 2:08 PM
cab cab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,450
The architecture in SWF seems to be degrading. We're starting to see the boxy slabs of the Pearl and above ground parking. Its a shame, you would think a architectural firm would want to one up its competition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2007, 4:50 PM
NJD's Avatar
NJD NJD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 632
Hard to tell anything from those renderings... both leave a lot to the imagination... we'll have to wait and see, i guess...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2007, 3:26 AM
awg awg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Downtown PDX
Posts: 141
Quote:
they both look a bit uninspiring and boring...I guess the bigger the firm, the more boring the work...which is why I only really want to work for small firms.
Not buying that. Among the most prestigious firms in the world, size is an asset: Foster's practice, Piano's, Richard Meier, KPF, etc. All of them are in the hundreds of employees. Even closer to home that doesn't hold a lot of water--Allied Works and BOORA get a good deal of design press and I believe they are sizable (AW 50ish? between NY and PDX and BOORA was in the ballpark in recent memory).

I think the quality of the work is independent of the size of the firm; its an easy target but not an accurate one. Size allows firms to do big work (scale) and a lot of work--but it doesn't preclude design excellence. That is about the people that run the place and the kind of work they attract.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2007, 3:46 AM
anp's Avatar
anp anp is offline
Now in Portland!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife View Post
they both look a bit uninspiring and boring...I guess the bigger the firm, the more boring the work...which is why I only really want to work for small firms.
I hope you like doing accessibility upgrades, redesign of existing interior space, and other such small jobs. I can say, based on my own experience working at a small firm, that small firms get a lot of mundane jobs, and bigger-name firms often get the more interesting, higher-budget projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:46 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.