Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert.hampton
Reading that makes it seem not so extreme after all -- the added costs are less than one percent and that is for a low-rise building with a large roof-surface area. So one would expect for taller projects that relative cost would drop quite a bit -- and we can expect absolute costs to drop substantially as economies of scale and innovation kick in.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert.hampton
|
Rant:
Is that 1% and time frame a guaranty? What about maintenance and repairs? How will this impact project feasibility? Now if the city wanted to offer incentives to include green roofs I'd be interested.
Denver is going the wrong direction towards becoming an increasingly regulation-happy Nanny City. Ever rising construction costs are likely to threaten the current euphoria and I could foresee a slower buildout in RiNo ahead etc. They've already burdened developers with an 'affordable housing' fee; what's next? It doesn't seem like Denver has the 'bell cows' that some cities have to support ever more costly development.
Given the new tax cuts etc. I look for Phoenix to be one of the bigger winners if you assume that new fabrication and assembly plants will be developed. Intel is positioned to spend $7 billion on their new 10nm chipset Fab 42 facility - they're just waiting for the ink to dry. Apple has been lurking and already built a new flagship $2 billion, 1.3 million SF data center in Mesa.
AZ/Phoenix has positioned itself as the epicenter for self-driving vehicles. AZ has transformed itself into a highly cost-competitive and business friendly state. Fewer Regs and they'll power assist in helping with those.
Point being that Denver has slid in more recent business friendly ratings; many states/cities are vying for next-gen investments. Things can change; it's happened before.