HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1641  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 1:03 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
I always like comparing different ages.


A before and After: ESB and Chrysler, 1934 VS 2016

1934:


ca. 1934 - Midtown Manhattan Skyline. Aerial view. by cobravictor, on Flickr

2016:


One World Observatory - Midtown by Brad White, on Flickr

The super talls will rise!!! 2020 is next. The sequel in 4 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1642  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 1:40 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008

WOW!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1643  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 1:26 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
45 Broad + 80 South + 3 WTC + Seaport


Credit: Thomas_Koloski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1644  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 10:49 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Now that's the transformation that Downtown really needs!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1645  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 11:54 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,862
http://www.dezeen.com/2016/08/05/new...#disqus_thread


New York's supertall towers "damage the city fabric" says Elizabeth Diller


__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1646  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 2:05 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,493
I want to damage her face; jk. But seriously, she can sod right off with that bs.
__________________
There’s no greater abomination to mankind and nature than Ryan Home developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1647  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 3:10 AM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,617
I would implore our fellow forumers to skip that article. It gave me a migraine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1648  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 3:43 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,075
I think this Elizabeth Diller character should probably just move somewhere else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1649  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 6:13 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,862
Not an actual proposal (yet), so I didn't create a thread, but another potential supertall for Queens....


https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external...99416021&row=5


Quote:
Structure Type: Feasibility Study
Structure Name: Site 1 - 41-02 22nd Street

Site Elevation: 14

Structure Height: 1000

Total Height (AMSL): 1014

A few more "studies"...


https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external...9416026&row=10

Quote:
Structure Type: Feasibility Study
Structure Name: Site 6 - 43-01 Queens Street

Site Elevation: 16

Structure Height: 1340

Total Height (AMSL): 1356


https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external...99416025&row=9

Quote:
Structure Type: Feasibility Study
Structure Name: Site 5 - 23-17 44th Drive

Site Elevation: 16

Structure Height: 1100

Total Height (AMSL): 1116

https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external...9416027&row=11

Quote:
Structure Type: Feasibility Study
Structure Name: Site 7 - 45-55 Pearson

Site Elevation: 14

Structure Height: 1029

Total Height (AMSL): 1043
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.

Last edited by NYguy; Aug 17, 2016 at 6:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1650  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 1:01 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
Scroll ======>


Credit: Thomas_Koloski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1651  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 2:50 AM
James Bond Agent 007's Avatar
James Bond Agent 007 James Bond Agent 007 is offline
Posh
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
Posts: 21,151
Now they just need a few supertalls in JC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1652  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 9:35 AM
UniDerp's Avatar
UniDerp UniDerp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
Scroll ======>


Credit: Thomas_Koloski
What's up with the two suns?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1653  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 12:24 PM
Swede's Avatar
Swede Swede is offline
YIMBY co-founder
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: sol.III.eu.se.08
Posts: 6,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Not an actual proposal (yet), so I didn't create a thread, but another potential supertall for Queens....
How many do this add up to now? 5 potential supertalls in Queens, all in LIC?
__________________
Forumers met so far:
Huopa, Nightsky, Jo, wolkenkrabber, ThisSideofSteinway, jacksom, New Jack City, LeCom, Ellatur, Jan, Dennis, Ace, Bardamu, AtlanticaC5, Ringil, Dysfunctional, stacey, karakhal, ch1le, Hviid, staff, kjetilab, Þróndeimr, queetz, FREKI, sander, Blue Viking, nomels, Mantas, ristov, Rafal_T, khaan, Chilenofuturista, Jonte Myra, safta20, AW, Pas, Jarmo K, IceCheese, Sideshow_Bob, sk, Ingenioren, Ayreonaut, Silver Creations, Hasse78, Svartmetall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1654  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2016, 11:54 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
Same pic but with labels. Rendering courtesy of Thomas Koloski

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1655  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2016, 12:36 AM
Fardeb Fardeb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 100
^ Just to the left out of view in that shot there will be about a half dozen 550-900ft towers in Journal Sqaure. The harbor views will be will be amazing in a few years. To think that its a poor/far off view of the biggest group in Midtown and the fact that you can't even see LIC at all makes it even more amazing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1656  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2016, 1:23 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
More density in Jersey and Brooklyn to get this party going!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1657  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2016, 10:21 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swede View Post
How many do this add up to now? 5 potential supertalls in Queens, all in LIC?
About that. However, my instincts were correct in that these aren't actual proposals (yet) and also in that only an entity such as the City itself could be behind so many studys.


Quote:
This Feasibility Study, otherwise known as a limited aeronautical review, is being conducted based upon a submission by the New York Department of City Planning as it relates to the possible future expansion of Long Island City due to rezoning.

The New York City Planning Department is neither an actual sponsor nor proponent at this time. This Feasibility Study is not a formal determination, and is based on very broad, estimated, or general information supplied by the Planning Department as it relates to potential structures whereby the city may work towards identify maximum allowable heights in certain areas for future planning purposes.

Please keep in mind that there is always a possibility that a formal aeronautical study submitted by a proponent may prove to be different from the results indicated in this study, as the results of this study are not considered an official FAA determination.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1658  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 4:17 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,862
Regarding 15 Penn:

http://rew-online.com/2016/09/16/vor...to-apartments/

Vornado: Hotel Penn office conversion unlikely, tower may be turned into apartments


BY CHRISTIAN BRAZIL BAUTISTA
SEPTEMBER 16, 2016


Quote:
Vornado CEO Steven Roth has ruled out converting Hotel Pennsylvania into a supertall office tower, instead floating the possibility that the hotel may be turned into an apartment building.

In a conference call during the 2016 Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Real Estate Brokers Conference, Roth expressed skepticism over a possible office conversion, saying that the site cannot compete with other Manhattan office complexes such as Hudson Yards and the World Trade Center.

“The problem is we cannot deliver the site economically in competition with what Hudson Yards is doing and the World Trade Center is doing. And we’re not off by a little, we’re off by a lot for lots of different reasons,” he said.

“So I wouldn’t predict that a large office tower is in our future for Hotel Penn. I mean I can’t tell you how much we hate having to build a building where we have to get $150 rents or something like that, which are not in the market. It’s just not something that we do.”

While Roth has narrowed down the possibilities, it is still uncertain whether the property will be turned into apartments or will continue operating as a hotel. “The options for Hotel Penn are, leave it where it is, knock it down. If we knock it down, it’s going to be apartments and retail. If we leave it the way it is, it’s going to be a hotel,” Roth said.

Hotel Pennsylvania, which sits near Madison Square Garden and the Empire State Building, has been awaiting renovations since 2013. Vornado originally planned to raze the building to give way to a 1,216-foot tower called 15 Penn Plaza. However, plans were shelved when Merrill Lynch decided not to take space in the building in 2007.


I call this a bunch of BS that doesn't make sense for several reasons. Here are a few:


1. Penn Station. The city's plan for revitalizing the Penn Station area (which is still in process) has called for creating an office district around the country's busiest transit hub. As well it should. 15 Penn Plaza, which went through the approvals process, was to be the "1 Vanderbilt" of the area - with the approved development rights transfer depending on the numerous transit improvements to and around Penn Station, including a reopening and widening of the passageway between the Herald Square lines, the PATH, and Penn Station.

2. Midtown East/Hudson Yards. The claim that they are off and behind everybody on the west side and downtown at the WTC is also flawed. The WTC has taken over a decade to rebuild because the Downtown market has always been slower to absorb new office space, particularly the large amounts that will be absorbed with the new WTC. That is because not everyone wants to or is looking to move Downtown.

There are few towers of this size on the west side waiting for tenants to be built - 50 Hudson Yards and the Spiral. You can add 2 Manhattan West to that equation. Related has one more large scale office tower planned for the western half of the yards, but that's something that will happen after the current railyard development is complete.

As far as Midtown East goes, look at the speed of work that went on getting the site of One Vanderbilt ready for construction. They moved with a purpose because they wanted to get it done. However, with the rezoning of the area still in the approvals process, there is no way developers are saying they aren't going to plan any more office towers there because they are behind progress of the Hudson Yards and the WTC.

3. Apartment tower. Even if - and its a big if - the City approved plans for the conversion of that space to residential, it would be 3 msf of apartments/condos. Compare that to the size of the Central Park Tower, which is less than 2 msf. I could only see that done with maybe a 2 msf tower and 1 msf of condos on top, or something to that effect.

I don't think the city will be happy at all with anything less than getting new office space built on the site. Other than that, Vornado will just have to live with the hotel, but there's still the matter of those valuable development rights. Vornado holds numerous properties in the area, but I doubt the city would allow the transfer of those rights from the Manhattan Mall to another site.

I remember when Brookfield said they wouldn't be building Manhattan West because of the rents that would be required to do it. But look what's rising now.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1659  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 4:24 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,739
I could see an apartment tower rising on this site.

On other hand, office makes sense too, but maybe Hudson Yards is just too much competition for right now? We'll just have to see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1660  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 4:26 PM
Eidolon's Avatar
Eidolon Eidolon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 697
^^^
Honestly, I feel like the reclassififcation of this tower from proposed to cancelled is jumping the gun, just like last time. After all, they have delayed the tower before and this is most probably just a similiar case. No matter what gets built at the site, I know that it's going to be a supertall. Nothing else makes economic sense, be it residential or office. The real question is if the construction initiates significantly before or around 2023, when the Penn station is going to be re-engineered.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.