HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Parks, Metro, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 11:47 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Portland/Vancouver & Carbon Emissions Footprints

If this column isn't in the correct thread please feel free to move.

Thursday, May 29, 2008 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

Study: Seattle area No. 6 on list of smallest carbon footprint

By FELICITY BARRINGER
The New York Times
The West Coast's metropolitan areas, including Seattle, had among the lowest carbon emissions per capita in the country in 2005, according to a new ranking of 100 urban areas.

The region's mild climates, hydropower and aggressive energy-reduction policies give its residents smaller carbon footprints, on average, than those of their counterparts in the East and Midwest.

The Honolulu area, with the smallest carbon footprint, ranked No. 1 in the study, from the Brookings Institution, followed by the area including Los Angeles and Orange counties in California, the Portland-Vancouver area, the New York metropolitan area and the Boise-Nampa, Idaho, area.

The Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue area ranked sixth.

A cluster of Rust Belt urban areas were at the bottom of the rankings, including Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Toledo, Ohio, and Lexington, Ky., which ranked last.

The authors offer a partial portrait of overall emissions, concentrating on residential electricity and fuel use and the mileage traveled by cars and trucks, factors that contribute about half of overall carbon emissions. The calculations do not include industrial emissions, those from commercial or government structures and those from air, rail or sea transportation.

The report was accompanied by policy recommendations, including federal legislation setting a price on carbon emissions, increasing financing for energy research and development, revising federal policies that reward states with high levels of travel and fuel use and providing more, and more predictable, financial support of mass transit.

While the report did not go into the precise causes of each ranking, it provided hints at factors that correlated with higher or lower scores. Population density and the availability of rail transportation were associated with lower per-capita carbon emissions; the Los Angeles area is the most densely populated in the country, according to Brookings figures.

Outside of the West Coast, metropolitan areas in the top 25 included Boston; Buffalo, N.Y., Chicago; New Haven, Conn.; Poughkeepsie, N.Y.; and Rochester, N.Y.

Also associated with high rankings were government policies that promoted energy efficiency, particularly electricity rate-setting policies.

Rate-setting by state regulators has traditionally been geared to make more money for a utility if it sells more electricity. While rates may remain relatively low, pleasing customers, utilities have little incentive to encourage energy conservation.

The Washington, D.C., metropolitan area ranked No. 100 in per-capita residential carbon emissions and No. 89 on the overall list.

"The Washington, D.C., metro area's residential electricity footprint was 10 times larger than Seattle's footprint in 2005," the report said. "The mix of fuels used to generate electricity in Washington includes high-carbon sources like coal while Seattle draws its energy primarily from essentially carbon-free hydropower."

California sets extensive energy-efficiency requirements for home appliances; per-capita energy use has remained largely flat in the state for 30 years. This factor, combined with its low-carbon electricity and warmer climate, is probably why eight of 10 California metropolitan areas made the top 25 on the Brookings list.

Among the report's recommendations was a change in federal law that would require home sellers to disclose the annual energy costs of the dwelling in the years before the sale.

The measurement system was created by three Brookings authors: Marilyn Brown, a professor of energy policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology; Frank Southworth, who is on the senior research staff at Oakridge National Laboratory; and Andrea Sarzynski, of the Brookings Institution.

Material from The Associated Press is included in this report.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi...&date=20080529
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 30, 2008, 3:22 AM
rsbear's Avatar
rsbear rsbear is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas - Hill Country
Posts: 822
I wonder how much better Portland would rank if it wasn't for Vancouver?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 30, 2008, 4:40 AM
IanofCascadia IanofCascadia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsbear View Post
I wonder how much better Portland would rank if it wasn't for Vancouver?
I was thinking exactly the same thing. The term "metro area" really needs to be defined in better terms. If they only included the city of Vancouver then these numbers would be very different than if they included McMansion Vancouver (Camas, Ridgefield, Battleground). Also, I think that clumping Seattle, Tacoma, and Bellevue really gives a false impression... all three cities really have independent economies at this point.

As for why Portland did not place higher, it is because of PGE. A quarter of PGE's electricity comes from coal and another 40% comes from natural gas (produces approximately half the CO2 of coal depending on whether it is combined or simple cycle). What I am at a loss to understand is how LA placed so high...not exactly the most environmental of cities.

PGE Power Generation: http://www.portlandgeneral.com/about...comparison.asp
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Parks, Metro, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:26 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.