HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     
Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation

View Poll Results: Is SEPTA doing a great job in regards to bus, subway, and commuter rail overall??????
YES 38 49.35%
NO 39 50.65%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1481  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2019, 8:10 PM
Skintreesnail Skintreesnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 231
I agree that BSL is the top contender for branching. It's definitely not as busy as the MFL with twice the tracks. If heavy rail is too cost-prohibitive, maybe light rail would work. Two tracks for the existing BSL and two for light rail branches, kind of like the MFL/subway-surface lines. Could even incorporate the city branch tunnel. Based on this random map I found (no idea how accurate it is) it seems like South Philly and NE Philly are the most under-served:

https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/v...882b1ed4b0aebf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1482  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2019, 11:02 PM
Delthayre Delthayre is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 14
Becuse the Frankford El goes straight to Frankford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
Good point on the car length. I saw they both have six car consists and the cars looked similarly long so i didn't consider there would be a significant difference. I'm also surprised the peak frequency is only 4 minutes. In many cases frequency is limited by the availability of rolling stock, but in this case 4 minutes is the minimum for the signalling system?
I don't know if it's a limitation of the signal system. 'Popular' holding among local transit advocates is that the M4 cars are lemons. (There was a story about two and a half years ago about cracks in their bolsters) Each costs more to maintain than the BIVs, which are about fifteen years older, and they have about half the mean distance between failures (I.e. ~120,000 for the BIV cars, but ~ 60,000 for the M4 cars). I once read an old fleet management plan submitted to the FTA for the M4 cars that indicated that mean distance between failures, which was ~60,000 at time of purchase, was expected to better with experience and that they were intended to support three-minute headways. The MFSE ran much more service in the past. I recall reading a report from before 1920 about the PRT running 40 cars per hour, which William S. Twining, Phialdelphia's second Transit Commissioner, thought improvements could be raised to 44 trains per hour, which was desired as contemporary plans called for the planned, but never built, Darby Elevated, mostly to run along Woodland Avenue, to begin as a branch of the Market Street Subway-Elevated until demand made a dedicated route to Center City, which was variously planned as a Chestnut Street Subway or branch of the South Broad Street Line. (A local transit activist has made a very handy series of representations of various historical plans using Google Maps)

SEPTA has 218 M4 cars in service, two having been reassigned to be work cars. It's worth noting that the Broad Street Subway runs about eight five-car local trains, eight five-car express trains and nine two-car Ridge Spur trains (Crudely, ~ 98 cars per hour) with a fleet of 125 BIV cars, but the Market-Frankford Subway Elevated runs fifteen hourly trains (Crudely, ~90 cars per hour) with a fleet of 218 cars. Something about the terminal configurations at 69th Street and Bridge Street (*achem* "Frankford Transportation Center), might account for some of the difference, but that seems inadequate to explain everything. I imagine that multiplying trains per hour by cars per train is inadequate to fully understand the number of cars needed for service, but comparing the ratio of that to fleet size is suggestive. By that crude methodology, the BSS operates with a ratio of 78.4 % of its whole fleet, but the MFSE only 41.3 % of its fleet. Unless the M4 cars are too unreliable or they have too few drivers, it seems that SEPTA should be able to run better frequency on the MFSE. (Worth noting is that General Manager Knueppel's overwrought scheme to lengthen the trains to eight cars also calls for acquiring more MFSE cars and adding yard space; both seem awkward the justify as 218 cars seems like it should be enough for longer trains, even if terminals limit frequency, and the M3 fleet comprised 270 cars)

Last edited by Delthayre; Sep 17, 2019 at 11:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1483  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2019, 11:33 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 2,968
One way to solve the problem is purchase open gangaway trains and automate the line. I few years ago SEPTA was considering adding platform screen doors to the Downtown Stations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1484  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2019, 8:52 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is online now
Exhausted Drexel Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: University City, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,467
The last Silverliner II and III were towed to an unknown location yesterday:
https://www.instagram.com/p/B3GUq-CH...on_share_sheet
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
End

Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.