HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2008, 9:17 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,339
Omaha swallows nearby suburbs and then taps new residents for money for downtown

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1216...2_1593_leftbox

Outward and Inward

Omaha's one-two punch: It swallows nearby suburbs and then taps new residents for money for downtown cultural institutions


By JOEL MILLMAN AND KAREN RICHARDSON
July 28, 2008; Page R5

Clear it, and they will build. That's part of the formula that has made Omaha, Neb., one of the nation's biggest success stories.

Omaha ended the last century as one of the most disadvantaged cities in the U.S. Its downtown was crumbling, as businesses closed and residents fled to the suburbs. And there wasn't much else in the area to latch onto: To the east, the city is pinned against a shallow, commerce-free river, and in the other directions it faces a prairie with a dwindling population.

Yet today Omaha is thriving, thanks to an ambitious renewal strategy -- and an especially generous populace.

This city of 433,715 has grown outward by gobbling surrounding suburbs and inward by clearing out big, rusting chunks of its downtown and pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into arts and entertainment. Lots of cities have tried similar strategies, but Omaha had a singular advantage: strong civic leadership.

As the city swallowed all those nearby towns, it added thousands of wealthy suburbanites to its rolls -- and they have proved instrumental in organizing and funding the downtown renewal drive. They have ponied up the bulk of the money for the projects and often outperform the city in raising cash.

Take the Qwest Center Omaha, an 18,500-seat indoor arena that opened in 2003. Built for $291 million, about a quarter of its construction was funded by wealthy locals. Two years after opening, Qwest ranked in the top 10 among tickets sold for entertainment facilities world-wide. Last year, it drew more than 320,000 ticket holders.

"Our goal was to make Omaha the place to be on weekends," says Roger Dixon, the director of the center.

The Big Turnaround


Of course, there are limits to the strategy. For one thing, the city may not be able to expand outward much farther, since it's running out of towns to annex. (Residents often joke that if Omaha keeps going, the city might as well annex Lincoln, the state capital.) And some new residents lament the city's relatively high taxes, saying that the burden keeps them from retiring to the city.

For all the potential pitfalls, however, Omaha remains a striking success story. Among the dozens of U.S. cities with faded downtowns, few can match Omaha's efforts to remake itself.

Its downtown is growing into a Mecca for the arts, both popular and highbrow. Besides the Qwest arena, private donors have helped fund the $92 million Holland Performing Arts Center, set on land where Swanson once churned out TV dinners. Up next: a $140 million minor-league baseball stadium, key to holding onto Omaha's signature sports franchise, the College World Series.

As the big-ticket attractions proliferate, smaller players squeeze in. Film Streams, an arts cinema that doubles as an opera house, came in last July, right next to the trendy rock club and independent record-company offices. All three still face a vacant lot, but probably not for long.

Omaha's efforts began in the mid-1990s, when the city put together a planning commission to revive the downtown. The group decided to undertake radical surgery on the city's industrial core. With a mix of private and public funds, the city cleared out hundreds of acres of old railroad tracks, sprawling scrap-metal yards and an ancient lead smelter abandoned by Asarco Corp.

"It was so ugly, you just closed your eyes coming in from the airport," recalls Connie Spellman, director of an urban-policy group called Omaha By Design. The ride in from the nearby interstate highway was almost as dismal -- rusted railway bridges and concrete ramps that dropped motorists into an empty downtown, freezing cold much of the year.

After clearing out downtown, city planners courted new tenants to fill it. The city pushed its reputation for wholesome Midwestern values and top-notch schools, as well as its flurry of arts spending.

In 2000, the city landed a big new resident: Gallup Inc. The polling organization agreed to move its headquarters from Lincoln to a site in Omaha overlooking the Missouri River, where the old Asarco smelter once stood.

Meanwhile, three older downtown residents -- Union Pacific Corp., First National Bank of Omaha and newspaper publisher Omaha World-Herald Co. -- unveiled proposals to reinvest downtown, plowing millions into new corporate homes. Today, all three companies work out of new office towers, anchoring a work force that the city's economic-development office puts at 40,000 individuals in a 33-block central core, with almost 50,000 more within walking distance. Among their big neighbors: ConAgra Foods Inc., which moved a crew of top managers down from Minneapolis.

As companies have moved into the city, so have lots of new residents. The downtown area has added about 2,300 households since 1990 -- a huge total for a city of Omaha's size. New homeowners tend not to be the bohemians often associated with early stages of gentrification, but a slightly older demographic: bankers, attorneys and managers for Omaha's leading corporations. The very types, in other words, who patronize the opera and can afford to pay $100 and up for Bruce Springsteen tickets at the Qwest Center.

But that's not the only way Omaha has added new residents. The city has also undertaken a relentless annexation strategy.

Under Nebraska law, any incorporated city can annex any other jurisdiction and add its tax base to its own. The only restrictions: The targeted towns must have fewer than 10,000 people and be located in the same county.

Over the past decade, Omaha has added between 600 and 3,000 people to its rolls each year, essentially by following affluent Omahans as they move west into outlying Douglas County. The biggest bump along the way: In 2006, the town of Elkhorn sued in Douglas County District Court to stop Omaha's land grab, arguing it was too big to be annexed. Elkhorn lost.

In a way, Omaha's mergers and acquisitions mirror those of its most famous corporate citizen, Warren Buffett. Like Mr. Buffett, Omaha is interested only in top performers. Tax revenue from any annexed district must exceed its debt service. Usually, that means Omaha waits until a village like Elkhorn is well into paying off the cost of laying down streets and water lines before it swoops in.

Other U.S. cities grow by acquisition, notably Albuquerque, N.M., and Oklahoma City, and Omaha's leaders are unapologetic about the tactic. The alternative, they say, is to face the fate of St. Louis or Kansas City -- places that have steadily lost population since the 1950s, in some cases to less than half their historic peaks. Omaha, with 433,715 residents, would have fewer than 250,000 if it were confined to its 1960 limits.






The strategy brings a number of advantages, Omaha officials say. Not only can the absorbed towns lower costs by sharing public services with the city, there's no need for them to compete for commercial development.

"We often have national companies, who are skilled at playing one community against another, ask us what incentives we provide to encourage them to build their store in Omaha versus another community," says Steve Jensen, the city's planning director. "They're usually surprised when we tell them we don't offer any."

A Stake in Tomorrow

Most important, growing the city geographically means giving those affluent suburbanites a stake in decisions made for downtown. Instead of becoming an impoverished inner city surrounded by wealthy suburbs -- and appealing to outside philanthropies or the federal government for aid -- Omaha has grown used to spreading its wealth.

"If you don't have a growing city, you don't have much of an opportunity to grow arts and culture," says Omaha's mayor, Mike Fahey. "And that quality of life is essential for any economic development."

As Omaha expands outward, city fund-raisers make sure to target one group of suburbanites in particular: Berkshire Hathaway investors. The area has a deep vein of private wealth centered around Mr. Buffett's conglomerate; many residents bought into the company in its early days and reaped impressive gains as it grew.

"You literally have the case of the college professor and his wife who scraped up $1,000 to invest in the beginning," says John Gottschalk, former publisher of the Omaha World-Herald and an arts supporter. "Today, that guy has $200 million he doesn't know what to do with."

--Mr. Millman is a staff reporter for The Wall Street Journal in Portland, Ore. He can be reached at joel.millman@wsj.com. Ms. Richardson is a former staff reporter in the Journal's New York bureau. She can be reached at reports@wsj.com.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2008, 11:27 PM
Jeff_in_Dayton Jeff_in_Dayton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,576
Im impressed!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 12:14 AM
alon504's Avatar
alon504 alon504 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,039
Impressive...there was talk of New Orleans taking in some suburbs East and West of the City, just after Katrina, which would put the city around 900,000 today if it had occurred. All in all, though, I'm glad things stayed the same and we didn't annex any suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 12:56 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
I'm surprised the outer voters support things. In Seattle, yes votes tend to fall the farther you are from Downtown for anything seen as "Downtown centric."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 2:17 AM
WonderlandPark's Avatar
WonderlandPark WonderlandPark is offline
Pacific Wonderland
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bi-Situational, Portland & L.A.
Posts: 4,129
I just drove through there a couple of days ago and you can easily see that Omaha is doing just fine in this economy, its very impressive to see for a city relative to its size. But much of that is way out in the sprawling western side of the city. There are two monster hotels going up in what is practically a farm field as you head towards Lincoln.
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away"

travel, architecture & photos of the textured world at http://www.pixelmap.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 3:59 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
What an incredibly lax annexation law, and I'm also baffled by the amount regional cooperation. Either this is all too good to be true, or Omaha really is all that the article says it to be.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 4:24 AM
hauntedheadnc's Avatar
hauntedheadnc hauntedheadnc is offline
A gruff individual.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greenville, SC - "Birthplace of the light switch rave"
Posts: 13,435
North Carolina has very city-friendly annexation laws, but there's a push to gut them. We can thank some rich, cranky old retirees in a fancy subdivision west of Asheville for that. They have the money, time, and self-centeredness to ruin every city in the state just so the poor dears won't have to lay off a servant in order to pay new city taxes.
__________________
"To sustain the life of a large, modern city in this cloying, clinging heat is an amazing achievement. It is no wonder that the white men and women in Greenville walk with a slow, dragging pride, as if they had taken up a challenge and intended to defy it without end." -- Rebecca West for The New Yorker, 1947
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 5:18 PM
Top Of The Park's Avatar
Top Of The Park Top Of The Park is offline
no its not...
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,030
Omaha is doing some very smart things apparently
__________________
I see idiots
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 6:23 PM
alexjon's Avatar
alexjon alexjon is offline
Bears of antiquity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Downtown/First Hill, Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,340
Douglas County needs a simple rail system now-- maybe throw in spurs to Dodge and Sarpy county.
__________________
"The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion." -- George Washington & John Adams in a diplomatic message to Malta
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 9:47 PM
bobdreamz's Avatar
bobdreamz bobdreamz is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami/Orlando, FL.
Posts: 8,130
I was in Omaha in the late 80s and even then the city impressed me. You could sense there was a fair amount of civic pride in the city. Perhaps it's isolation is part of it since the only thing I remember between Omaha and Lincoln was nothing but cornfields. It's good to see this city doing well.
__________________
Miami : 62 Skyscrapers over 500+ Ft.|150+ Meters | 18 Under Construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 10:24 PM
MplsTodd MplsTodd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Columbus & Mpls
Posts: 765
Good job Omaha! I visited your downtown in the early 1990s, and, apart from the small, but at least interesting Old Town, the downtown was pretty sad looking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evergrey View Post
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1216...2_1593_leftbox

Other U.S. cities grow by acquisition, notably Albuquerque, N.M., and Oklahoma City, and Omaha's leaders are unapologetic about the tactic. The alternative, they say, is to face the fate of St. Louis or Kansas City -- places that have steadily lost population since the 1950s, in some cases to less than half their historic peaks. Omaha, with 433,715 residents, would have fewer than 250,000 if it were confined to its 1960 limits.
While St. Louis is a classic case of population loss due to inability to expand (Minneapolis, Boston, Cleveland are others), I'm surprised that KC gets cited. Whenever I look at a City map of KC, it seems they expanded outward significantly to the north and to the south.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2008, 11:54 PM
oldmanshirt's Avatar
oldmanshirt oldmanshirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SATX > KCMO > DFW
Posts: 1,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by MplsTodd View Post
Good job Omaha! I visited your downtown in the early 1990s, and, apart from the small, but at least interesting Old Town, the downtown was pretty sad looking.



While St. Louis is a classic case of population loss due to inability to expand (Minneapolis, Boston, Cleveland are others), I'm surprised that KC gets cited. Whenever I look at a City map of KC, it seems they expanded outward significantly to the north and to the south.
KC has plenty of empty land to the north, and is by no means surrounded. The problem seems to be that growth in the northern suburbs is barely enough to make up for the loss of population in the inner city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 1:57 AM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
I Couldn't Tell Anyone
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,988
I'm truly amazed at how lax annexation laws are there. Such a thing could be a key to saving some dying cities but the article also mentioned the other key factor - [b]strong civic leadership[/i], the other thing whose lack kills great places.
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 2:13 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 13,095
Evergrey: As an urban planning student, what are your thoughts on this issue? Could such policies be successful in great lakes cities: Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland?
__________________
Check out the latest developments in Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh Rundown III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 5:13 PM
donclark's Avatar
donclark donclark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 889
If you do not like bedroom communities being annexed by the major city, I am in favor of the major city using tolls for vehicles and transit passengers entering the city. The local television and radio signals should die at the city limits. Citizens of bedroom communities should get no benefits living next to a major city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 3:37 AM
shane453 shane453 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 755
Oklahoma City has discovered the hard way that the annexation strategy isn't always that great. 250 square miles of rural, undeveloped land is a huge issue when funding utilities and roadways. And it doesn't do much for average population density figures, or parkland per square mile, or anything of that nature. Any study that uses a "per sq mile" statistic shouldn't even bother with OKC unless they subtract all the wilderness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.