HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 4:53 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Municipal Politics

Thread to talk about local politics.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 9:49 AM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
So who thinks that all urbanist aldermen are going to get the boot next election and we'll end up with Mayor McIvor? From the comments I see on various newspaper sites I'm concerned this may be the case.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 2:17 PM
Stang Stang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
So who thinks that all urbanist aldermen are going to get the boot next election and we'll end up with Mayor McIvor? From the comments I see on various newspaper sites I'm concerned this may be the case.
I'm not a gambling man, but... if I was, I'd put money on Mayor Ric.

I can't even visit CTV.ca anymore because it pisses me off too much. Whining about pedestrian bridges (based on misinformation, of course), whining about voting themselves pay raises (which they didn't), whining about pretty much anything.

The media spin (probably due in part to city hall's lack of communication and clarity on some issues) has been skewed to say the least, and the public has lapped it up.

A vast majority of the comments on a site like CTV are certainly against the current council, and some are downright hostile. Of course there may be a certain demographic that comments on news sites (maybe the same demographic that phones into afternoon radio to complain because they don't have anything else to do while everyone else is working?), but the level of discontent is noticeable.

And while I (and probably many others on this forum) might not agree with their comments and actually have the wherewithal to look a little deeper into civic issues, everyone's vote counts.

Enter Ric McIvor. Just sayin'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 2:42 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
You forgot the outrage about closing one lane of Memorial for a Sunday in August. Yes, outrage and people who can't wait for saviour McIvor to come to the rescue.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 4:18 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,869
Guys, it's McIver, not McIvor. As much as some don't like him, let's at least spell his name correctly.

I think it's entirely too early to make predictions for almost a year and a half from now, as a lot can change, not the least of which is who the aldermanic and mayoral candidates are. The economy can change, major projects can go through, funding from higher levels of government can increase or decrease, etc.

With that in mind, I'll give my opinion on current council members:

Mayor Bronconnier - At this point, a veteran mayor who I agree with most of the time. Prone to grandstanding sometimes, but is at the very least respected by most of council. Overall is amassing a decent legacy, much of which likely won't be realized until a few years down the road, such as all the LRT expansion.

Ward 1 Dale Hodges
- Long past his best-before date. The terms "outdated" and "out of touch" apply more often than "wise," or "veteran presence."

Ward 2 Gord Lowe - Probably the most "urban"-leaning of the far-suburban aldermen. Ball-buster who seems to care more about the issues than the politics surrounding them, which is refreshing. He's the veteran presence that Hodges should be.

Ward 3 Jim Stevenson - Not bad for a rookie, a little too regressive for my liking, but seems fairly moderate on most issues. His work to-date on the Airport Trail tunnel is commendable.

Ward 4 Bob Hawkesworth
- Middle-of-the-pack alderman, who I just happen to agree with on most things. Probably his most notable work is done as FCM representative.

Ward 5 Ray Jones
- Only slightly less of a ghost than Fox-Mellway. I don't have much of an opinion on this guy

Ward 6 Joe Connelly
- The worst of the rookies, and probably a step back from his predeceasor Burrows. All of the regressiveness of McIver and Colley-Urquhart with none of the charisma. Less whiney than Chabot though.

Ward 7 Druh Farrell
- Definitely the most urban-issues-oriented member of council who I often agree with. Also prone to grandstanding which can be negative. Passionate, if so by taking the unpopular (in the media and hence general public) route. The best example of a visionary on council whether you agree with her or not. Progressive.

Ward 8 John Mar - Certainly has impressed me as a rookie since I was expecting a lot less. Well-spoken and generally a good example of the young blood that is needed on council.

Ward 9 Joe Ceci - Level-headed alderman who is generally a quiet, behind the scenes, committee guy. Seems to be well-respected by other members of council. I agree with him on most issues.

Ward 10 Andre Chabot
- Terrible alderman who is the most overt about using petty tactics such as stalling for the sake of stalling. Seems to think that he's doing the world a favour by being an asshole.

Ward 11 Brian Pincott
- Quiet and subdued, but a decent rookie. His leanings are clear, but he doesn't seem to get into the thick of playing politics.

Ward 12 Ric McIver - Probably the alderman I least agree with, in both opinion and tactics. Nevertheless a talented and popular politician that knows how to work the media.

Ward 13 Dianne Colley-Urquhart
- Definitely on my shit list on most issues. Not much more to say really, I just don't agree with her. I do admire her passion I suppose.

Ward 14 Linda Fox-Mellway - A ghost, who I didn't have much of an opinion on until yesterday when she fumbled her way through her statements on the proposed Plan It delay. She said she hadn't read the plan yet. I suppose that ward could have worse, but it could have a whole lot better too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 5:27 PM
wild wild west wild wild west is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dynamic City
Posts: 6,076
Great idea, frink. My 2 cents on these guys.


Mayor Bronconnier - Bronco has a knack for getting what he wants. He's bright, charismatic and can convey his arguments convincingly. I still think he's a bit self-serving in some respects (pushing WLRT ahead of SELRT, opposition to increased density in established communities and Springbank, pushing through certain new subdivisions that should never have happened) but I'd rather a strong mayor than a milquetoast. Achievements in terms of infrastructure, funding from province, and fast-track timelines on certain projects are impressive.

Ward 1 Dale Hodges - A big impediment to just about everything positive happening in this city. Extremely intelligent but always working to delay, obstruct, and generally work against the greater good.

Ward 2 Gord Lowe - Lowe is awesome. He is perhaps the most pragmatic member of Council and I get the feeling he makes his decisions based on his perception of the greater good rather than political advantage, horse-trading or posturing.

Ward 3 Jim Stevenson - Very knowledgeable from his years on SDAB. A bit too tight with McIver's gang. Certainly an upgrade from his predecessor.

Ward 4 Bob Hawkesworth - All-around nice guy but for a supposed "progressive" he's very disappointing. Always seems to cave to the NIMBY's.

Ward 5 Ray Jones - Focuses on local ward issues as opposed to the big-picture stuff. By all accounts he's good at looking after his constituents,

Ward 6 Joe Connelly - Much more intelligent, at least, than Chabot, but prone to ridiculous grandstanding and a bit of a stool pigeon for McIver. The ideological mudslinging directed at Farrell is getting tiresome.

Ward 7 Druh Farrell - I think Druh would be a terrible mayor since her view of things is very black-and-white, but she is exactly what we need right now for a downtown alderman.

Ward 8 John Mar - Mar frustrates me. He plays games on Council, and his voting pattern is just plain erratic. I get the feeling he is horse-trading for Council votes.

Ward 9 Joe Ceci - Well-respected, intelligent, progressive, and an all-around nice guy.

Ward 10 Andre Chabot - Prone to grandstanding and dumb as a post.

Ward 11 Brian Pincott - Stays out of the mudslinging, very intelligent and a nice guy. A promising new face on Council.

Ward 12 Ric McIver - Ric is a pro at grandstanding and getting the media on his side. Call him many things, but dumb he is not. He's good on the economic issues but doesn't recognize the value of investments in the public realm, downtown core, etc.

Ward 13 Dianne Colley-Urquhart - Passionate, but the grandstanding drives me nuts.

Ward 14 Linda Fox-Mellway - After all this time I am still trying to figure out what she stands for.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 3:50 PM
Grendel's Avatar
Grendel Grendel is offline
Dr Morgan, AME
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mission, Calgary
Posts: 233
The Calgary Herald's online poll question for today asks whether you support the proposed (now defeated) closure of Memorial Dr for the day. For what it's worth, if you were in favour of it (as I am) I encourage you to vote on the poll.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 4:22 PM
wild wild west wild wild west is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dynamic City
Posts: 6,076
Interesting article on the dysfunctional nature of Council.

Once again the flashpoint is a meaningless, entirely symbolic debate about the impending chaos if we were to close 2 lanes of Memorial Drive on a fricking Sunday. I am so utterly fed up with this Council and the constant grandstanding over minor symbolic issues. This is the 3rd largest city in Canada. We have a population as large as Saskatchewan or Manitoba. We spend billions of dollars on infrastructure and services every year...and the folks who dictate where that money goes are arguing over pedestrian bridges, plastic bags and closing Memorial Drive on one Sunday a year.


Calgary council infighting 'distracts' politicians

Jostling evident well before civic vote, says alderman

By Kim Guttormson And Joel Kom, Calgary HeraldMay 13, 2009 7:14 AMComments (11)

CALGARY - It is still more than 16 months away, but the next municipal election is already affecting city hall and how it gets things done.

With roots in last fall's budget wrangling, divisions on council are fuelling vicious debates, rumours of conservative slates to challenge sitting aldermen and speculation on who will challenge the incumbent mayor.

And there are worries the bickering and political positioning--which has exposed long-simmering personal rifts--will make it difficult for council to work together, affecting every decision it tries to make.

"It takes two to get an argument going,"veteran Ald.Dale Hodges said. "It distracts some members of city council and the administration from the real issues here. It's just people staking out their positions."

This is the first time in his 26 years on council that overt political jostling is so evident more than a year before an election, he said.

"Some of the people here want to start the election a year early," Hodges added.

Ald. Gord Lowe said he's not surprised tempers are flaring.

"We're seeing a council now divided along ideological lines, and unfortunately more time is being spent on politics than city business," he said. "I find that regrettable."

Ald. Joe Connelly said debate in the past has been more one-sided ideologically, but that's changed since he and Ald. Jim Stevenson, among others, have joined what he sees as the pro-business chorus.

"City hall has been hijacked by special interests,"Connelly said. "What ideology built Calgary? I think it's a pro-business stance, instead of a left-leaning stance."

Rumours of conservative-minded slates have been making the rounds, although Ald. Ric McIver, for one, says he puts little stock in them.

Ald. Druh Farrell hopes council isn't teetering toward party politics.

"Council's strength is we're 15 individuals. Calgarians have always been in support of a non-partisan structure at city hall," she said. "No matter how fiery the debate is, council usually gets it right."

On Monday, a debate over whether two lanes on Memorial Drive should be closed for a street festival became a flashpoint for pent-up anger.

Lowe called out some of his colleagues for trying to halt the closure, saying it was about politics. Ald. Brian Pincott called it petty and frivolous.

Connelly, one of four who brought forward the motion to stop the lane closure, accused his colleagues of believing they know better than the people who elected them, and after the meeting said it was about one alderman trying to raise her profile.

On Tuesday, Lowe described the debate as "acrimonious."

But McIver said he has no problem with the tone.

"We're not actually here to hold hands and agree on everything. We're here to make decisions, and sometimes that requires a bit of enthusiasm," he said.

McIver is frequently rumoured to be eyeing a run for mayor in next year's election, and donning a hockey jersey last December with "2010" on the back did nothing to quell speculation. That in turn has some of his council colleagues believing every move he makes is done solely with the mayor's chair in mind.

McIver said he still has not made a decision about a mayoral run.

"When you're a politician, you're always campaigning, let's face it," he said.

The names of a couple of other aldermen have been floated for the mayoral race, but none with the frequency of McIver.

Mayor Dave Bronconnier has said barring any change in plans, he will run for the city's top job a fourth time.

Election or no, council has a job to do, Ald. Bob Hawkesworth said.

"I think we are expected to govern, and that requires a certain level of professionalism," he said. "We have to be able to live with our differences.

"We need to get back to policy. We're going to have to be more responsible and lighten up."

jkom@theherald.canwest.com

kguttormson@theherald.canwest.com

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 5:50 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by wild wild west View Post
Interesting article on the dysfunctional nature of Council.

Once again the flashpoint is a meaningless, entirely symbolic debate about the impending chaos if we were to close 2 lanes of Memorial Drive on a fricking Sunday. I am so utterly fed up with this Council and the constant grandstanding over minor symbolic issues. This is the 3rd largest city in Canada. We have a population as large as Saskatchewan or Manitoba. We spend billions of dollars on infrastructure and services every year...and the folks who dictate where that money goes are arguing over pedestrian bridges, plastic bags and closing Memorial Drive on one Sunday a year.
Couldn't have said it better myself. I don't mind debates over big-impact, big-dollar projects and issues. It's the political games I can't stand. The $25M bridges expenditure issue dragged on longer, and saw as much council and media attention as solving the routing of the $700M+ WLRT. There's one distinct camp in council (the fantastic four from wards 6, 10, 12, and 13), and another, less tight opposing camp, and some others in the middle. There's 3 groups to blame here though, and the other is the media. Look at me with a straight face and tell me that Rick Bell, Michael Platt, Ian Robinson, Naomi Lakritz, etc. haven't been playing games and trying to wag the dog.

As for the article, I think Hodges' soundbites are spot on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 7:27 PM
wild wild west wild wild west is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dynamic City
Posts: 6,076
Yup...and don't forget Myke Thomas of course. Won't be much of a surprise when the newspapers offer their endorsements.

On the bright side, the higher profile of municipal politics these days as well as watershed moments like the new MDP ought to really help voter turnout in our next municipal election (and hopefully not because people are PO'd because it took them 15 seconds longer to drive along Memorial Drive one Sunday...).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 8:23 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
The Calgary Herald's online poll question for today asks whether you support the proposed (now defeated) closure of Memorial Dr for the day. For what it's worth, if you were in favour of it (as I am) I encourage you to vote on the poll.
No one's proposing a closure of Memorial Drive for a day that I'm aware of (yes, the poll calls it a closure - kinda ignoring the key word "partial").

And it got defeated?? I thought it was passed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 8:29 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,869
^The proposal to deny closures (partial or full) on sundays in August on Memorial drive, moved by Ald. Jim Stevenson was defeated. There is yet to be a formal application to close (partially or fully) Memorial Drive in August. Confused yet?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 9:33 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
^The proposal to deny closures (partial or full) on sundays in August on Memorial drive, moved by Ald. Jim Stevenson was defeated. There is yet to be a formal application to close (partially or fully) Memorial Drive in August. Confused yet?
Don't do what Donny Don't does.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 10:17 PM
Beltliner's Avatar
Beltliner Beltliner is offline
Unsafe at Any Speed
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 949
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
No one's proposing a closure of Memorial Drive for a day that I'm aware of (yes, the poll calls it a closure - kinda ignoring the key word "partial").

And it got defeated?? I thought it was passed.
That The Fishwrap should torque their pull poll question should come as a surprise?
__________________
Now waste even more time! @Beltliner403 on Twitter!

Always pleased to serve my growing clientele.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 13, 2009, 10:26 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
Construction Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castleridge, NE Calgary
Posts: 5,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
^The proposal to deny closures (partial or full) on sundays in August on Memorial drive, moved by Ald. Jim Stevenson was defeated. There is yet to be a formal application to close (partially or fully) Memorial Drive in August. Confused yet?
Why don't we just leave the road closures to the transportation dept, you know, the people that actually get paid to figure out whether these closures work?

What does an alderman know about whether road closures such as these work anyway? They don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 20, 2009, 3:04 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,688
She always been Big Red ... she's always been True Blue ... now one of Calgary's most charismatic aldermen wants to play in bigger sandbox

By RICK BELL

Last Updated: 20th May 2009, 3:20am

Big Red is going blue.

Big Red is, of course, Ald. Diane Colley-Urquhart, a leading voice among the few sensible souls in a civic sandbox where just when you think things can't get any worse in the asylum they always do.

Last night, Diane informed local Tories she is seeking the party's nomination in the upcoming byelection battle in the southwest riding of Calgary-Glenmore.

The seat is open because Deputy Premier Ron Stevens resigned last week and is expected to be appointed a judge by the feds, with talk saying he could be headed to the Alberta Court of Appeal.

Ron is very well-respected and was named Premier Ed's right-hand man when the boss needed some love in this city and required someone with Ron's credibility.

Ron leaves big shoes and the Liberals always put up a heck of a fight in Glenmore and Ed doesn't have anything close to coattails to ride here.

So it is understandable some Tories want Diane in the race, a recognizable politician from the city's southwest who is actually an individual of longtime conservative beliefs and not the usual bandwagon jumper with the politics of the consistency of Play-Doh looking for a cheap ticket to the capital.

Diane headed up Ron's campaign and has worked years for both the provincial and federal Tories. She is the president of the Tories in Stephen Harper's constituency and bills herself as a moderate and "certainly not of the far right."

"Anything can happen in a byelection. You know, byelections are wild cards and it's really, really important for us to run a person with a proven track record serving the community," says Diane.

"We need people who will stand up and speak up, especially in these turbulent times. I take a stand.

"Yes, I've peeved people off.

"Yes, I have enemies.

"But you always know where I stand. You know what you're getting."

Truthfully, Big Red does not use the word "peeved."

"This is not the best time for Calgary and now is definitely not the time to throw this constituency to the opposition."

Big Red will be an aldermen nine years come July, winning a seat on council in a byelection and twice being returned to office without opposition.

On the pages of this newspaper, you will have read of her fight against high taxes and unnecessary spending and the seemingly endless stupid schemes floated by other aldermen with far too much time on their hands.

She's also on the police commission and supported more cop boots on the ground to fight criminals and more services for the mentally ill who need a helping hand and not a hitch in the hoosegow.

Big Red has indeed fought many times against Bronco but she has managed not to slime him as some city hall Satan.

There is much the candidate will say as other names are touted for the Tory nomination.

Diane speaks of the challenges facing Calgary and the surrounding communities -- water, land use, transportation, the list goes on, finally ending with the holding down of the right pinkies to the right paper to get the southwest ring road really and truly inked.

This early on in the contest, Big Red even ventures a little into current provincial punch-ups. As a nurse, as well as an elected official, she makes a point of backing Rockin' Ron Liepert, the Tory health head honcho, who has plans to revamp the medical system.

"We need to make the changes and we need people who will not blink," says Diane, pulling out a word from the early days of Ralph when the Tories possessed a plan more ambitious than just keeping their cushy keesters in power.

If she is nominated and if she wins, neither a gimme, she would join a caucus of city Tories ... well ... let's just be kind and say there aren't a lot of stars in that universe.

Diane says by growing up in the small but sensible town of Oyen, she feels she can relate to the premier and can confidently kick it in the slough water with the many good old boys on the Conservative benches.

"I wouldn't do this if I didn't have respect for Ed Stelmach," she says.

There will be those who don't want Diane to leave city council, where there is precious little sanity around. There are those who wanted her to run for mayor.

What all these people don't realize is a famine of talent exists at the provincial level as much as at the city.

It's just because it's Tories with little on the bench some folks look the other way.

Diane insists she's running but not running away and vows she will not become a puppet for the party, a tall order when some MLAs just hope they're around long enough for good severance.

"Nothing about me will change. The only way I'll ever fly below the radar is to dye my hair," says Big Red, now a hopeful for a Tory nomination.

But, Big Red, if you end up in the legislature, won't you miss the theatre of the absurd downtown? She laughs.

"If you were still drinking, we could have a good conversation and really get into it."

RICK.BELL@SUNMEDIA.CA

http://www.calgarysun.com/news/colum...08511-sun.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 20, 2009, 3:35 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Calgary needs a manager not a visionary to clean up the mess left by Bronconnier. City finances are a disaster.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 20, 2009, 5:17 PM
wild wild west wild wild west is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dynamic City
Posts: 6,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed View Post
Why don't we just leave the road closures to the transportation dept, you know, the people that actually get paid to figure out whether these closures work?

What does an alderman know about whether road closures such as these work anyway? They don't.
Stevenson's the same guy who suggested that the development industry knows more than staff do about how the City should grow, when commenting on Plan|it|...rather indicative of his view on administration I would think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 28, 2009, 11:02 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
Well this could have an interesting impact on future elections:

Quote:
Province cuts off pocketing leftover civic campaign funds

Last Updated: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 | 7:00 PM MT

CBC News


Successful municipal politicians now face stiffer restrictions on campaign contributions, and what they can do with surplus funds after changes to Alberta law this week.
Changes to the Local Authorities Election Act now limit unions or corporations from donating more than $5,000 to a candidate, and require that surplus campaign funds be either:
  • Held in trust by municipalities to be carried over to a re-election campaign.
  • Given to the city.
  • Donated to a charity.
Previous Calgary councils decided against setting rules on what to do with surplus campaign money.
"I think it's very important that we have hard and fast rules, and now the province has stepped up and said these are some basic rules that you have to follow," said Calgary Ald. Brian Pincott on Wednesday.
Former alderman Barry Erskine welcomes the changes. He retired from politics just a month before the October 2007 civic election and was pressured to prove he donated the leftover money raised for this campaign to charity — even though he was under no legal obligation.
"I tell ya, I really felt very, very beat up about the fact that I had less than $5,000 and I said I was going to use it for charity," Erskine told CBC News on Wednesday.
"All of us want to do the right thing, and I'm glad it's being defined."

Surplus can't be applied to other political races
Candidates who don't get elected and have money left over are not bound by the new rules. Mayor David Bronconnier, who has previously voted against campaign changes and is also sitting on a surplus, said that's unfair.
"I think this is a positive step. I think there is some tweaking required though to make sure that it applies not only to those who are successful in seeking public office but to ensure that the enforcement rules are in place for all candidates," he said.
Some politicians, including aldermen Druh Farrell, Joe Ceci and Pincott, have self-imposed limits on how much they'll accept from a donor.
This week's amendments also preclude funds from being used for political endeavours on other levels. That means the $55,000 or so in Ald. Diane Colley-Urquhart's campaign account will not be eligible for her provincial run at the Calgary-Glenmore seat vacated by Ron Stevens earlier this month.
Colley-Urquhart filed her nomination papers on Wednesday seeking to be the Alberta Conservative candidate in the riding.
The next civic elections are scheduled for October 2010.
Source
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 29, 2009, 3:15 AM
wild wild west wild wild west is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dynamic City
Posts: 6,076
/\This is good news. A change that was long overdue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:53 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.