Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar
Some of you guys just don't get it the WPS and WFPS need all they money they can get and should get , our very very good mayor and council will give it to them and raising property taxes is a must, everyone must do their part to make sure all civic employees are very very well paid and looked after, way too much negativity in here!
|
I don't dispute the WPS and WFPS deserve money but I still find some of their choices questionable like motorcycles that can only be used a few months out of the year, hovercraft the sit in a museum and now a helicopter and APC (aka tank). I have said it many times before, I don't disagree that air support may add value but that I feel not enough was done to study the possible return from a drone v helicopter. Sure 20 years ago commercial drones were not were they needed to be but when the helicopter was purchased the type of drones the police could have had access to likely could have offered a similar value for a lower upfront cost, lower operating cost and lower maintenance cost.
I also think with people looking at the total budgets to the two services the funding against outstanding pension deficits should be listed as a separate line item as it would make it easy to monitor the true growth in spending on these services. That past civic governments made mistakes and did not adequately fund the pension doesn't change we need to fix it. I also am not one pushing for pension reform, that is for the bargaining table. I would just like to see the current operational costs separated out.
With the current WFPS I am not aware of any issues but that could be a concern in itself and perhaps there are things hidden that the public should be asking about. It's not about always saying no but rather making smart purchases, say a drone to inspect a fire scene from above v extra funding to build a fire fighting museum annex to a new station.