HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1721  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2016, 1:29 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,854
Arrow add a dash of Santa Monica

^^^^Maybe they can tweak that red building a bit. It's not gonna win any beauty prize as is.
§ Regarding all the back-and-forthing about people in Surrey not knowing what a downtown is, etc etc etc, someone will come show them, plus they're travelling and learning all the time.
If new SFH is built, or condos, let's hope they look nice. Let's take the telephone poles and signs down, and put the wiring underground.
There is already some fine new architecture in Surrey, as I saw in an SFU Surrey thread. If the streets are sleek and green, the transport works, the infrastucture works and looks nice...
It's gonna be great, given good street life, liveable and pleasant residential, close amenities, and pleasant surroundings with a high % of green.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1722  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2016, 1:32 PM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
The new design, while cheaper in shape, reminds me more of Vimy Ridge with the highlighted red protrusions...

The older design, while much more expressive, might cause some people to call it the "twin towers"... and I doubt the legion wants to be mistakenly associated with 9/11 vs its actual purpose of honouring Canada's veterans.

Now I suppose they could have changed the structural design itself such that the building(s) looked more like Vimy Ridge itself (and perhaps with a giant connected glass atrium in the middle such that it actually looks like one building), but it's hard to say whether the legion would have been able to afford that... I mean... the economics of building a tower at Guildford are already shaky enough given the cheap land available throughout the rest of the City of Surrey...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1723  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2016, 6:09 PM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 542
The land won't cost them anything, as they already own it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1724  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 9:39 AM
SurreyonTheMap SurreyonTheMap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Surrey
Posts: 40
As someone who wants Surrey to become more and more distinct, I'm all for stuff like this new building for the veterans especially it's around the time of 100 year anniversary of World War 1. As Allan_Kuan said, that the new building does look more like Vimy Ridge, i would like it to be similar to that and redrawn to become more similar to Vimy Ridge.

I also think Surrey needs something like a clock tower something like a steam clock in downtown Vancouver somewhere in city centre which would really look nice for Surrey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1725  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 6:24 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
I feel like the best possible site for a historical landmark in Surrey would be the corner of 108 and King George, 'Whalley's Corner'. Could somehow signifiy the former rest stop/service station that was once there on the route between New Westminster and the US Border, and where Surrey developed from. A public art piece in the plaza that will eventually be built on that corner, perhaps a replica of the original sign?

Other than that you cant really make up a historical land mark like the steam clock.

The veterans project will create a new plaza space which will become Surrey's equivalent to Victory Square. The space will be used for Remembrance Day ceremonies and likely have a memorial. Will contribute to the sense of place in Surrey's downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1726  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 2:27 AM
sryboy's Avatar
sryboy sryboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Over at www.civicsurrey.com Paul has posted the first renderings of the new arena in North Surrey.:

http://www.civicsurrey.com/2016/11/1...ement-project/

Maybe i feel spoiled by all the great architecture in Central City but this design looks blah...

too bad they couldn't have worked out a P3 deal or something with the Giants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1727  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 2:45 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by sryboy View Post
Over at www.civicsurrey.com Paul has posted the first renderings of the new arena in North Surrey.:

http://www.civicsurrey.com/2016/11/1...ement-project/

Maybe i feel spoiled by all the great architecture in Central City but this design looks blah...

too bad they couldn't have worked out a P3 deal or something with the Giants.
It looks very nice to me
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1728  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 3:00 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,321
My complaint would be that there's seating only along one side of the rink and the other side meets the wall. One end is open for something (entrance to the building or the rink itself?) and we can't see if there's anything at the other end.


http://www.civicsurrey.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1729  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 4:44 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,408
I think there's another open space behind that wall - you can see through some of the openings - could be another rink or a gym?
If it's a gym - it also raises the question whether that dividing wall is moveable (with the uneven openings to show a "flex" wall) to allow for additional seating on the other side (for special events) - subject to what look like narrow steel columns to support the joint in the roof arches.

The wavey roof form over the rink pictured is - I think - the middle arch on the exterior drawings.


http://www.civicsurrey.com/2016/11/1...ement-project/

Last edited by officedweller; Nov 23, 2016 at 4:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1730  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 4:51 AM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Arena looks fine. It's not meant to be a spectator arena... its function is for minor hockey leagues mainly, mostly for youth, as the current rinks serve now.

Will be a much welcome addition the Scott Rd Station area, and hopefully spur further re-development around it / kick-start the South Westminster Plan.

With completion in summer 2019 though, looks like we still have a long wait until the Surrey Central rinks can be redeveloped.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1731  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 7:38 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
the reason for the blank wall is for the plan of future expansion. While only building two right now they want to have more there in the futures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1732  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2016, 9:25 PM
Ramsay's Avatar
Ramsay Ramsay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whalleyboy View Post
the reason for the blank wall is for the plan of future expansion. While only building two right now they want to have more there in the futures.
I"m not so sure about that, it looks like there is another sheet of ice on the other side of that partition.

I think the design fits well with the South Westminster location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1733  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2016, 10:33 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whalleyboy View Post
the reason for the blank wall is for the plan of future expansion. While only building two right now they want to have more there in the futures.
Building two what? The report says they are building three ice surfaces as part of this project. Sorry a bit confused.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1734  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2016, 8:20 AM
rickvug rickvug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 150
(whoops, wrong thread)

Last edited by rickvug; Nov 26, 2016 at 8:20 AM. Reason: wrong thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1735  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2016, 8:48 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
Building two what? The report says they are building three ice surfaces as part of this project. Sorry a bit confused.
I could have sworn the plans called for 2 with the planning for a 3rd later. I didn't see the plan change for three.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1736  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2016, 8:33 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1737  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2016, 3:39 AM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I think there's another open space behind that wall - you can see through some of the openings - could be another rink or a gym?
If it's a gym - it also raises the question whether that dividing wall is moveable (with the uneven openings to show a "flex" wall) to allow for additional seating on the other side (for special events) - subject to what look like narrow steel columns to support the joint in the roof arches.

The wavey roof form over the rink pictured is - I think - the middle arch on the exterior drawings.


http://www.civicsurrey.com/2016/11/1...ement-project/
I don't mind the design but I really just want SOMETHING by Scott Road. That area is such a diamond in the rough. And I don't necessarily mean that we have to expand residential in the area either,
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1738  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2016, 6:34 AM
BobLoblawsLawBlog's Avatar
BobLoblawsLawBlog BobLoblawsLawBlog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
Horrible design for the first one. They look like if Seapunk was thrown into architecture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1739  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2016, 8:40 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
This one is back on the Council agenda for Monday Dec 5 for OCP Amendment, Rezoning, DP, and DVP, also to set a date for another Public Hearing.

Since the last Public Hearing in 2015, the developer, WestStone, has now acquired all of the mobile homes on the property, with the last purchase set to close on June 30, 2017.

At that point the site will be vacated and they can move forward with the project.

Will see two 6-storey seniors apartment buildings, and a 12-storey mixed-use assisted living care facility/office building built across the street from Surrey Memorial and at the southern edge of City Centre. Will also create a new road dedication extending 95 Avenue from the west,








http://www.surrey.ca/bylawsandcounci...0114-00(3).pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1740  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2016, 10:34 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Open House was held last week for Forsyth Park, a new park being planned for City Centre. Phase 1 is scheduled to open by Fall 2017.

There was a nice illustrative plan of the future City Centre as part of the boards.

See link below for boards:





Close up of the Surrey Central area:



http://www.surrey.ca/culture-recreation/2076.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.