Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Brown
Bump. Bing doesn't know what the hell he's doing and I'm still convinced that the city will get an emergency financial manager later this year (despite the mayor changing his mind every other week).
|
Later this year?! Barring a consent agreement by the end of this month, an EM will be in place by next month; March at the very latest. The process has already started. In fact, the first phase of the review is over showing "financial stress", as they call it. The city has something like a month to appeal the finding and/or come up with a consent agreement. We're not talking end of the year, here, when this process runs out, we're talking
weeks.
That's the thing about the new EM law; once the clock is started, and once stress is found, it can not be turned back. If I remember correctly, the process - barring a city being able to fix its finances on its own - is three months at the very longest. How I see it is the first phase (the stress test) is the phase where the municipality or school district under review has some kind of power. They can try and cook the books before giving them to the reviewer and paint the rosiet and best case scenario. Oncee it reaches phase two, you're in union-busting territory. This is where the administration gives the mayor or superintendent time to bust unions hoping this will solve the crises. If that doesn't work, you're in the last phase, which is basically a kangaroo court where a city or district gets to plead its case to an administration that has already made up its mind to take you over.
IMO, I think the review has shown the city's problems to be so far beyond the unions, that when they failed the intitial street test, the rest of this process has simply been trying to figure out
who will be the EM, and not
if there will be one.