HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 3:45 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,775
NHL season 2017/2018

With the draft picks in Chicago next week it's time to start talking about this years up coming season.

https://www.nhl.com/nhl-draft

Here is the full draft order:

Round 1

1. New Jersey
2. Philadelphia
3. Dallas
4. Colorado
5. Vancouver
6. Vegas
7. Arizona
8. Buffalo
9. Detroit
10. Florida
11. Los Angeles
12. Carolina
13. Winnipeg
14. Tampa Bay
15. NY Islanders
16. Calgary
17. Toronto
18. Boston
19. San Jose
20. St. Louis
21. NY Rangers
22. Edmonton
23. Arizona (from MIN)
24. Columbus
25. Montreal
26. Chicago
27. St. Louis (from WSH)
28. Ottawa
29. Dallas (from ANA)
30. Nashville
31. Pittsburgh

Round 2

32. Colorado
33. Vancouver
34. Vegas
35. Arizona
36. New Jersey
37. Buffalo
38. Detroit
39. Dallas
40. Florida
41. Los Angeles
42. Carolina
43. Winnipeg
44. Philadelphia
45. Tampa Bay
46. NY Islanders
47. Ottawa (from CGY)
48. Tampa Bay (from TOR)
49. New Jersey (from BOS)
50. Anaheim (from SJS via TOR)
51. St. Louis
52. Carolina (from NYR)
53. Boston (from EDM)
54. Buffalo (from MIN)
55. Vancouver (from CBJ)
56. Montreal
57. Chicago
58. Montreal (from WSH)
59. Toronto (from OTT)
60. Anaheim
61. Nashville
62. Carolina (from PIT)

Round 3

63. New Jersey (from COL)
64. Vancouver
65. Vegas
66. Florida (from ARI)
67. Carolina (from NJD)
68. Buffalo
69. Arizona (from DET via SJS)
70. Dallas
71. Detroit (from FLA)
72. Los Angeles
73. Carolina
74. Winnipeg
75. Philadelphia
76. Tampa Bay
77. NY Islanders
78. Arizona (from CGY)
79. Detroit (from TOR)
80. Philadelphia (from BOS)
81. New Jersey (from SJS)
82. Edmonton (from STL)
83. Detroit (from NYR)
84. Edmonton
85. Minnesota
86. Columbus
87. Montreal
88. Detroit (from CHI via CAR)
89. Buffalo (from WSH)
90. Chicago (from OTT via CAR)
91. Anaheim
92. Nashville
93. Pittsburgh

Round 4

94. Colorado
95. Vancouver
96. Vegas
97. Minnesota (from ARI)
98. New Jersey
99. Buffalo
100. Detroit
101. Dallas
102. NY Rangers (from FLA)
103. Los Angeles
104. Carolina
105. Winnipeg
106. Philadelphia
107. Philadelphia (from TBL)
108. Philadelphia (from NYI)
109. Calgary
110. Toronto
111. Boston
112. Vancouver (from SJS)
113. St. Louis
114. Colorado (from NYR)
115. Edmonton
116. Minnesota
117. Columbus
118. Los Angeles (from MTL via DAL)
119. Chicago
120. Washington
121. Ottawa
122. Anaheim
123. New Jersey (from NSH)
124. Toronto (from PIT)

Round 5

125. Colorado
126. Edmonton (from VAN)
127. Vegas
128. Arizona
129. New Jersey
130. St. Louis (from BUF)
131. Detroit
132. Dallas
133. Florida
134. Los Angeles
135. Chicago (from CAR)
136. Winnipeg
137. Philadelphia
138. Los Angeles (from TBL)
139. NY Islanders
140. Calgary
141. Toronto
142. Carolina (from BOS)
143. San Jose
144. Chicago (from STL)
145. NY Rangers
146. Edmonton
147. Minnesota
148. Columbus
149. Montreal
150. Chicago
151. Washington
152. Pittsburgh (from OTT)
153. Anaheim
154. Nashville
155. Pittsburgh



Round 6

156. Colorado
157. NY Rangers (from VAN)
158. Vegas
159. San Jose (from ARI)
160. New Jersey
161. Buffalo
162. Detroit
163. Dallas
164. Detroit (from FLA)
165. Los Angeles
166. Carolina
167. Winnipeg
168. Philadelphia
169. Tampa Bay
170. Chicago (from NYI)
171. Calgary
172. Toronto
173. Boston
174. San Jose
175. St. Louis
176. Nashville (from NYR)
177. Edmonton
178. Minnesota
179. Columbus
180. Tampa Bay (from MTL)
181. Chicago
182. Washington
183. Ottawa
184. Florida (from ANA)
185. New Jersey (from NSH)
186. Pittsburgh



Round 7

187. Colorado
188. Vancouver
189. Vegas
190. Arizona
191. New Jersey
192. Buffalo
193. Detroit
194. Dallas
195. Boston (from FLA)
196. Philadelphia (from LAK via TBL)
197. Carolina
198. Winnipeg
199. Philadelphia
200. Tampa Bay
201. NY Islanders
202. Calgary
203. Toronto
204. Boston
205. San Jose
206. St. Louis
207. NY Rangers
208. Edmonton
209. Minnesota
210. Columbus
211. Winnipeg (from MTL)
212. San Jose (from CHI)
213. Washington
214. San Jose (from OTT)
215. Chicago (from ANA)
216. Nashville
217. Pittsburgh
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 6:06 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,775
Can a mod fix the title so that Nhl is NHL.


Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 5:49 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,775
Source: https://nhl.bamcontent.com

Draft pics this Friday night!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 6:09 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Carry over from last thread. Oilers deal Jordan Eberle to Islanders for Ryan Strome. Good trade, Oilers need to desperately dump salary and a 1 for 1 trade with no salary retain is pretty good value.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 9:50 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbanite
That was the cheesiest piece of crap expansion draft/award show ever. Why is the NHL incapable of marketing itself as a serious entity?

Vegas loaded up with a ton of d men. I assume we'll see some of them moved for staggered 2018/2019 draft picks before the start of the season.
According to the rules, Vegas had to pick 14 forwards, 9 defensemen and three goalies.

https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expansi...es/c-281010592

The way the rules were set up. Most teams opted to protect 7 forwards and 3 defensemen as opposed to 8 skaters. That results is a mediocre pool of forwards and a high amount of quality defensemen. Vegas can now trade these quality Ds for high ranking forwards.

IMO, the rule should have been that Vegas is stuck with its chosen roster for one year, seeing that they had the hands down best expansion draft options in the history of the NHL, or better yet, force them to pick an actual balance based on needs of an NHL team, that is 18 F-9 D-3 G. The way it was set up, they were allowed to select the balance of players from a pool of quality D-men to use as trade bait.

Last edited by J.OT13; Jun 25, 2017 at 2:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 9:53 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Vegas already dealt two of those D-men anyway (TVR to Carolina and Schlemko to Montreal). It's likely Methot gets flipped to Dallas as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 10:05 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
Sad the Flames lost Engelland to the GK, but it could have been worse.

Surprised about the Eberle - Strome trade, curious to see how that works out.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 4:25 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
According to the rules, Vegas had to pick 14 forwards, 9 defensemen and three goalies.

https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expansi...es/c-281010592

The way the rules were set up. Most teams opted to protect 7 forwards and 3 defensemen as opposed to 8 skaters. That results is a mediocre pool of forwards and a high amount of quality defensemen. Vegas can now trade these quality Ds for high ranking forwards.

IMO, the rule should have been that Vegas is stuck with its chosen roster for one year, seeing that they had the hands down best expansion draft options in the history of the NHL.
Quote from the NHL site on expansion rules;

* Vegas must select the following number of players at each position: 14 forwards, nine defensemen and three goaltenders.

How is that 30 players?

Last edited by J.OT13; Jun 25, 2017 at 2:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 4:44 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,775
Here is a waaaaay too early prediction.
https://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2017/6/...guins-olympics


My next prediction: A Canadian team makes the Stanley Cup Final for the first time since 2011.

The Oilers and Maple Leafs have shown real promise as young, talented Canadian teams this past postseason. Auston Matthews and Connor McDavid drove their respective teams to levels of success not many predicted this year. It’s probably bold to say that one of these teams will make it, but I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility here. Calgary might also be a team to watch next year, too, if they get a goaltender on the market in the offseason.

In any case, the Maple Leafs and Oilers are the blueprints of the NHL’s future. They’re coming to the Stanley Cup Final, sooner or later.



Relax everybody, as the guy states, it's a waay too early prediction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 4:48 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
Here is a waaaaay too early prediction.
https://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2017/6/...guins-olympics


My next prediction: A Canadian team makes the Stanley Cup Final for the first time since 2011.

The Oilers and Maple Leafs have shown real promise as young, talented Canadian teams this past postseason. Auston Matthews and Connor McDavid drove their respective teams to levels of success not many predicted this year. It’s probably bold to say that one of these teams will make it, but I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility here. Calgary might also be a team to watch next year, too, if they get a goaltender on the market in the offseason.

In any case, the Maple Leafs and Oilers are the blueprints of the NHL’s future. They’re coming to the Stanley Cup Final, sooner or later.



Relax everybody, as the guy states, it's a waay too early prediction.
It's one of those predictions that ends up with both teams missing the playoffs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 5:18 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,775
I never listen to predictions. It's just fun to read what some people think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 8:26 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Panarin to CBJ, Saad to CHI, Hjalmarsson to ARZ, Raanta & Stepan to ARZ. Crazy day and the draft hasn't even started yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 9:32 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
Panarin to CBJ, Saad to CHI, Hjalmarsson to ARZ, Raanta & Stepan to ARZ. Crazy day and the draft hasn't even started yet.
Hopefully there'll be some trades left on the draft floor.

Hearing Bettman say "We have a trade to announce" gives me a boner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 11:23 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Within the Cordillera
Posts: 12,493
Nico first overall!
__________________
Castlegar BC: SSP's hottest city (43.9C)
Lytton BC: Canada’s hottest city (49.6C)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2017, 2:01 AM
suburbanite's Avatar
suburbanite suburbanite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toronto & NYC
Posts: 5,373
Pretty happy with the Leafs grabbing Liljegren at 17. He was the consensus #2 at the beginning of the year before getting mono. Hopefully he's fully recovered and regains his form because he could end up being a steal.
__________________
Discontented suburbanite since 1994
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2017, 4:50 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
Flames are making great moves, I expect them to be one of the top teams in the west this year. Glad management is switching to "win it all" mode, hope the moves pay off!
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2017, 6:33 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Flames are making great moves, I expect them to be one of the top teams in the west this year. Glad management is switching to "win it all" mode, hope the moves pay off!
I like the Hamonic signing (damn you Flames!), not a big fan of the Mike Smith trade however. Flames are going to have a rock solid defence this year, offence will probably be so-so again.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2017, 6:57 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by lubicon View Post
I like the Hamonic signing (damn you Flames!), not a big fan of the Mike Smith trade however. Flames are going to have a rock solid defence this year, offence will probably be so-so again.
Smith should be an upgrade over Elliott still, but I think we could have done better. Defense is solid, just need a top line right winger and I think we're good!
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2017, 12:26 AM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Smith should be an upgrade over Elliott still, but I think we could have done better. Defense is solid, just need a top line right winger and I think we're good!
Smith is an upgrade over Elliott. Hopefully he plays like it behind that very solid top 4 on Defense. I imagine the Oilers/Flames games this year are going to be great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2017, 4:35 PM
ExcaliburKid's Avatar
ExcaliburKid ExcaliburKid is offline
Derp
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,179
Who's the Flames backup option if Smith goes down? He has a history of injuries, and with Johnson gone and Elliott not likely coming back, could be a sticky situation in net
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.