Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin
Rottie: I am singling out domed stadiums because that is what we are debating. If we were debating shopping malls, I would have posted data on how long it takes a shopping mall to get to the point where it needs to be retro-fitted or replaced.
You are absolutely correct that most domes and major sports arenas are no longer competitive after about 25-30 years. They may be viable structurally (although several have been demolished because they just became too expensive to maintain year after year), but they are not viable competitively without major expensive overhauls. Like you said, after 30 years Edmonton is replacing their arena because it is no longer competitive. What makes you think that our domed stadium will still be competitive in 25-30 years? In 25-30 years Regina's domed/retractable roof stadium will need to be replaced or we will have to spend another half billion dollars plus renovating the building like they did in Vancouver. Anyway, whatever choice we make should hold us for the next few decades and most of us probably won't even be around to debate this issue again in 2042.
|
I think it's ridiculous that these venues are being replaced after 30 years. If built properly they should be around 70 -80 years,maybe more seeing the huge expense that goes into them. My opinion is whatever gets built in Regina will be around alot longer than 30 years. This is the CFL we are talking about here.
Just for the record I think building a domed stadium is a bad idea unless the roof can open. If Regina doesn't build a retractable roof stadium, an open air stadium shouldn't be a regret. I recall seeing the Stones in Calgary at the Saddledome and seeing the Stones in Regina,outside,beautiful full moon evening,skyline in the background. That show blew away Calgary's show mostly because of the atmosphere. All the pro-dome people should keep that in mind.