HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2017, 9:31 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 5,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Authentic_City View Post
The Criminal Code is different than the Provincial Statute. I haven't seen any recent case law related to charges under the MB Act, but the language seems pretty vague: "No person... who is, through drunkenness, unable to drive or ride it with safety to other persons who are on a highway or bicycle facility..." There is no quantum of blood alcohol specified, therefore open to wide interpretation. I'd doubt there are any charges under the statute. I suppose you could be fined, but it would not be a criminal charge any more than a traffic ticket is.
You are correct. It isn't a DUI, but you can be given tickets and fines. So still not legal in the technical sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2017, 9:41 PM
StNorberter StNorberter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
The onus is on the cyclist because they are considered the same as motor vehicles. And I disagree that it is only a "dangerous environment because of drivers".
But why should cyclists have to put themselves in positions where they are uncomfortable because of the actions of drivers. And yes, it it a dangerous environment because of drivers. If you think it's because of cyclists, you're completely delusional. How many of the cyclist fatalites in car-bike collisions have been the fault of cyclists? 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
How many cyclists do you see that actually observe and follow general traffic rules? There are some for sure, but now how often do you see bikes weaving in and out of streets using the sidewalk when convenient, slipping up between lanes of traffic or between cars and the curb at stop lights? People driving cars can definitely be dangerous to cyclists, but a lot of the time, cyclists aren't exactly angels either, so let's not pretend otherwise.
How many of those actually endanger you as a driver? 0.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
As for "who really cares?" I do. Just as a bike is at a severe disadvantage to a car, a pedestrian is at a severe disadvantage to a bike.
So you care because a bike is bigger and pedestrians are at a disadvantage ( what does that even mean?), but your logic doesn't hold wrt car-bike interractions

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
"Slowing down as they pass pedestrians and giving them room". That's funny, it's certainly not been my experience.
Experience? Or perception? If you're a pedestrian, at walking speed, you would perceive cyclists to be speeding by you, not because they are, but because of the difference of speed. If I pass a pedestrian at 15 km/hr, they probably think I am speeding past them, as opposed to the reality of me having dropped my speed by at 10 km/hr as I pass them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2017, 5:17 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 5,639
Nice article and the mistaken rush for dedicated bikeways on roadways.

http://business.financialpost.com/op...moting-cycling
__________________
I'm sober enough to know what I'm doing, and drunk enough to really enjoy it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2017, 7:18 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Nice article and the mistaken rush for dedicated bikeways on roadways.

http://business.financialpost.com/op...moting-cycling
Correction: Nice opinion piece, written by Lawrence Solomon, executive director of Urban Renaissance Institute, a division of Energy Probe Research Foundation.

"Energy Probe is a non-governmental social, economic, and environmental policy organization based in Toronto, known for denying man-made climate change.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Probe

Remember, opinions are like ***holes. Everyone has one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2017, 11:32 PM
windypeg windypeg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Nice article and the mistaken rush for dedicated bikeways on roadways.

http://business.financialpost.com/op...moting-cycling
I can't help but notice that he has absolutely no data to prove that bikes are causing any of the problems he attributes to them, other than a vague observation that some of the roads with bike lanes also have traffic congestion. Anyone with a modicum of critical thinking skills can tell you that correlation does not necessarily equal causation.

Cyclists breathe in more pollution than others? That's an argument against cars and the fumes they spew out, not an argument against bikes. Cyclists get injured more often? That's an argument for safer infrastructure, and again a problem not cause by bikes but rather by cars that run into bikes. Plus he doesn't even try to show that those health costs outweigh the benefits - because they probably don't. Cycling infrastructure costs money? We spend as much on one single underpass for cars as the global cities he mentions are spending on their cycling revolutions. There's not a single intelligent point to be found in this thing. It's a propaganda piece and you just ate it right up.

Last edited by windypeg; Dec 3, 2017 at 11:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2018, 6:00 PM
tree's Avatar
tree tree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 123
i just saw this - sorry if already posted elsewhere



http://winnipeg.ca/publicworks/pedes...lanesystem.stm

awesome looks like construction starts this year - unless something has changed which i don't know about :|
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2018, 7:39 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is online now
Think about Winnipeg.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,361
^ Is that all? Doesn't seem like a particularly ambitious construction timetable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2018, 12:39 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,180
^At least it's something I guess. Would be nice to see it built and connected to the new bridge over the Assiniboine River: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manito...town-1.4474688.

Also, I would like to seem some connections from Downtown to the West End. The city is planning to route bikes from Omand's Creek to St. Matthews (along Empress). But St. Matthews doesn't really connect to downtown. Wonder if there is a long term plan here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2018, 4:58 PM
tree's Avatar
tree tree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Is that all? Doesn't seem like a particularly ambitious construction timetable.
Do you mean the finished product isn't ambitious or the timetable / construction details are lacking? If the latter - I don't know but it seemed all last year the bike paths were just forgotten so glad to see acknowledgement. I recall the Garry st water work was done as mentioned in 2017 so seemingly they are on schedule.

As for current project - its a start and I think the bike paths on Sherbrook are pretty great. Still wish they would do 1-way bike paths on Garry AND Fort instead of the 2-way bike path on the 1-way Garry street but I guess for sake of minimal disruption I'm thinking they went with this. I'm hopeful that in a few years they will do the Northbound 1-way on Fort.

We need more absolutely but this will be a major artery - if they make Graham or St.Mary the East-West bike corridor ("the portage ave of bikes") and Garry the North-South corridor ("the main street of bikes") then they only need one more or two to the North (from plan looks like maybe Notre Dame but not sure) and one more to the West (Memorial/Colony seem easy options here) to have something resembling a connected grid that serves MOST of the core area. (Assiniboine kind of the "Broadway" of bikes for the south)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Authentic_City View Post
^At least it's something I guess. Would be nice to see it built and connected to the new bridge over the Assiniboine River: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manito...town-1.4474688.
Nice thing about this route is since it terminates in the south at Assiniboine it will automatically access the new bridge via that bike lane. Will be possible to bike from Exchange to Osborne almost entirely protected.

Quote:
Also, I would like to seem some connections from Downtown to the West End. The city is planning to route bikes from Omand's Creek to St. Matthews (along Empress). But St. Matthews doesn't really connect to downtown. Wonder if there is a long term plan here?
I'm not aware of full plan at all for St. Matthews but thinking about it now it does make a lot of sense if they can run the bike lanes all the way down to where St. Matthews terminates at Maryland. By the time you're at Maryland you're minutes (seconds by bike) from UW and UW will be a major connection point for this infrastructure - so its close enough to downtown to make sense.



Looking at the map its a very easy connection to Sherbrook, UW and from there relatively close to some of the other downtown bike infrastructure.

I despise the 'construction pole' bike Paths on St Matthews around St.James (Winnipeg half-assedness at its finest) but if its temporary until they can make real bike lanes then i'll take it for now. I'm not hugely familiar with bike infrastructure in other major cities so its possible too I'm just being greedy by wanting everything to be nice bikelanes like we see on Sherbrook and Assiniboine lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2018, 7:13 PM
GreyGarden GreyGarden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 49
I did not realize this but apparently Hamilton Ontario has a bike-share system. Does anyone in know have any insight if there has been interest in Winnipeg for a bike-share system?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2018, 8:22 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vancouver/[Winnipeg]
Posts: 4,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyGarden View Post
I did not realize this but apparently Hamilton Ontario has a bike-share system. Does anyone in know have any insight if there has been interest in Winnipeg for a bike-share system?
I was only in very brief contact with a group that's thinking about it so I don't know how much I should say, but yes, someone is looking into it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2018, 1:39 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by tree View Post
Do you mean the finished product isn't ambitious or the timetable / construction details are lacking? If the latter - I don't know but it seemed all last year the bike paths were just forgotten so glad to see acknowledgement. I recall the Garry st water work was done as mentioned in 2017 so seemingly they are on schedule.

As for current project - its a start and I think the bike paths on Sherbrook are pretty great. Still wish they would do 1-way bike paths on Garry AND Fort instead of the 2-way bike path on the 1-way Garry street but I guess for sake of minimal disruption I'm thinking they went with this. I'm hopeful that in a few years they will do the Northbound 1-way on Fort.

We need more absolutely but this will be a major artery - if they make Graham or St.Mary the East-West bike corridor ("the portage ave of bikes") and Garry the North-South corridor ("the main street of bikes") then they only need one more or two to the North (from plan looks like maybe Notre Dame but not sure) and one more to the West (Memorial/Colony seem easy options here) to have something resembling a connected grid that serves MOST of the core area. (Assiniboine kind of the "Broadway" of bikes for the south)



Nice thing about this route is since it terminates in the south at Assiniboine it will automatically access the new bridge via that bike lane. Will be possible to bike from Exchange to Osborne almost entirely protected.



I'm not aware of full plan at all for St. Matthews but thinking about it now it does make a lot of sense if they can run the bike lanes all the way down to where St. Matthews terminates at Maryland. By the time you're at Maryland you're minutes (seconds by bike) from UW and UW will be a major connection point for this infrastructure - so its close enough to downtown to make sense.



Looking at the map its a very easy connection to Sherbrook, UW and from there relatively close to some of the other downtown bike infrastructure.

I despise the 'construction pole' bike Paths on St Matthews around St.James (Winnipeg half-assedness at its finest) but if its temporary until they can make real bike lanes then i'll take it for now. I'm not hugely familiar with bike infrastructure in other major cities so its possible too I'm just being greedy by wanting everything to be nice bikelanes like we see on Sherbrook and Assiniboine lol.
IIRC UofW's plan was to create a path from where St. Matthew's ends at Maryland right into the heart of the campus near the RecPlex. If you look on Google maps you can see where it would go, cutting north through some parking lots to connect with Furby Place/Richardson Corridor. Essentially it would extend St. Matthews into the campus, but for AT only. I believe the do own most of the (empty) lots in that area, so it might not be that far off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2018, 11:21 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
IIRC UofW's plan was to create a path from where St. Matthew's ends at Maryland right into the heart of the campus near the RecPlex. If you look on Google maps you can see where it would go, cutting north through some parking lots to connect with Furby Place/Richardson Corridor. Essentially it would extend St. Matthews into the campus, but for AT only. I believe the do own most of the (empty) lots in that area, so it might not be that far off.
Looking at the map, I can see what looks like a potential route, but it would require some sort of crossing infrastructure at Maryland and Sherbrook. Also, there have been some recent safety concerns and incidents along the path between UW's main campus and the Science Building on Langside and Portage. To connect with St. Matthews, you would basically extend this route further west through some other dodgy areas. I think the folks at UW may not be so keen to do this, especially since they no longer have students housed at Lions Manner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2018, 9:55 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Authentic_City View Post
Looking at the map, I can see what looks like a potential route, but it would require some sort of crossing infrastructure at Maryland and Sherbrook. Also, there have been some recent safety concerns and incidents along the path between UW's main campus and the Science Building on Langside and Portage. To connect with St. Matthews, you would basically extend this route further west through some other dodgy areas. I think the folks at UW may not be so keen to do this, especially since they no longer have students housed at Lions Manner.
Don't think this possible route is any dodgier than where many UW buildings in the area already are. And people won't be forced to use it lol. Right now there is no SAFE way to bike to campus. Ellice and Portage are horrible for bikes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2018, 10:01 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,611
Been travelling for a few weeks, currently in Vancouver, and have an observation about our cycling infra...

We have very similar infra to lots of very bike-friendly cities like Vancouver (obv not as much yet), which has lots of not ideal forms like painted lanes between parking and traffic, and painted ones on the edge where there's streets with no parking...

The biggest difference I've noticed is that literally every other city (including Saskatoon) actually has proper signage. For cyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles. It's very clear to people using any form of transportation who goes where, what to look out for, how cyclists treat different intersections etc. I just don't understand why Winnipeg is soooooo bad at proper signage.

Another thing aside from safety signage we're lacking is Bike Route signage. Just putting up the "Bike Route" signs is useless. What route are you on? Where does it go to? Would love to see the city develop naming/numbering system for routes like they're bus routes. Easy to follow and know where you're going. They've already devised the routes, just make the wayfinding info better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 6:55 AM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
Don't think this possible route is any dodgier than where many UW buildings in the area already are. And people won't be forced to use it lol. Right now there is no SAFE way to bike to campus. Ellice and Portage are horrible for bikes.
I agree, there is no safe way to connect from St Matthews to UW campus without riding on sidewalks or taking a roundabout route. I'm just not convinced UW will take the lead developing this route. They already encourage students to use Portage Ave rather than the path at night because of safety issues.

I would ride up to Ellice before St. Matthews deadends and Maryland and ride the last few block that way. Not ideal, but it keeps me off sidewalks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:55 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.