Well I am glad to see the price come down a bit on 101 E Buchanan, but even at $250K cheaper, it will still be tough to make numbers work, at least right now. The warehouse next door is for sale too, the one directly south of Stadium lofts. That one they want a flat $4million, or at least that is what the seller told me back in March. It too has not sold. But then despite being on the market for at least a year, 34 E. Jackson has recently raised their price from $8 mil to $9.9. It could be interesting with the whole entertainment district, but again, I cannot see a way to reasonably make the numbers pencil out at that starting figure when one considers the extensive renovation that would be required.
But back to Summit, I loved seeing the crain lifting right above me almost.
As regards vibrancy, I think that in the long run this will help. I know Orpheum did not help, but there were several things working against it. First was the fact that there were fewer units, and most of them were bought by investors during the start of the craze, therefor there really aren't many people living in the building at this time. We have no idea how many of Summit's units are investor bought, but I would hope that there will be a greater percentage of occupied units.
The second problem is a bit more "chicken and the egg" like. The people who do live at Orpheum get in their cars and drive somewhere else because "there isn't anything to do or eat downtown". I quote that because I know better, there are some great restaurants and night spots, but there aren't a lot yet, and those that are there sometimes have very funny, very early hours. They don't stay open because nobody sticks around, and nobody sticks around because nothing is open. The cycle will only be broken when enough people are there when they are open, that the businesses feel more comfortable risking being open late. At the same time, the residents have to take notice and support these risks when they are taken, and word of mouth needs to spread.