Diagram of USA construction projects - Page 8

M. Brown · #**141** Posted **Jul 30, 2006, 4:42 AM**

Stephenapolis · #**142** Posted **Aug 26, 2006, 12:32 PM**

Just thought I would give this one a bump.

Dream'n · #**143** Posted **Aug 26, 2006, 3:23 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephenapolis

Just thought I would give this one a bump.

considering it's not stickied (yet), good idea.

Chicago Skyline · #**144** Posted **Aug 26, 2006, 7:17 PM**

What a wonderful outlook for the USA construction projects in one visual friendly diagram, suprb job V!

firulais · #**145** Posted **Aug 26, 2006, 7:31 PM**

6 More days till the September Update

LosAngelesSportsFan · #**146** Posted **Aug 26, 2006, 8:20 PM**

Just a slight correction, The Hilton in Downtown LA is now a Ritz/Marriot at 54 stories and i believe its at 754 feet as well.

tuy · #**147** Posted **Aug 26, 2006, 10:19 PM**

I wouldn't worry about making this a Sticky. When the diagram gets updated, it will push to the top and then everyone can look at it. If it was getting updated on a daily or weekly basis, then maybe it should be a sticky.

Chicago Skyline · #**148** Posted **Aug 26, 2006, 10:45 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuy

I wouldn't worry about making this a Sticky. When the diagram gets updated, it will push to the top and then everyone can look at it. If it was getting updated on a daily or weekly basis, then maybe it should be a sticky.

Yea, I agree, making this thread sticky is easy for everyone in US want to keep track of their city constructions. I don't think that there are any other construction diagram updates as this for single cities.

vpauzuolis · #**149** Posted **Aug 27, 2006, 7:47 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by LosAngelesSportsFan

Just a slight correction, The Hilton in Downtown LA is now a Ritz/Marriot at 54 stories and i believe its at 754 feet as well.

What is official source of the height?

vpauzuolis · #**150** Posted **Aug 27, 2006, 9:09 AM**

Update:

SteveD · #**151** Posted **Aug 27, 2006, 2:09 PM**

Excellent vp!! I sure wish your diagrams went another 100 ft down to 500 ft, since then Atlanta would have four represented, but I understand your need to keep it higher. Dropping the height restriction down another 100 feet would likely mean four times as many buildings! Keep up the great work!

Fabb · #**152** Posted **Aug 27, 2006, 2:50 PM**

Good job !
Thanks again.

CHAPINM1 · #**153** Posted **Aug 27, 2006, 11:31 PM**

How close is the RSA Battle House to completion? It appears to be complete but if not then really close!

CHAPINM1 · #**154** Posted **Aug 27, 2006, 11:32 PM**

delete double post

LosAngelesSportsFan · #**155** Posted **Aug 28, 2006, 12:57 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by vpauzuolis

What is official source of the height?

To be honest, it was a number i recalled from an article a couple of months ago that was talking about the new design and the new hotel Company. i looked for it for 15 - 20 minutes and i couldnt find it, but when i do, i will post it with the correct height as well. By the way, the area is ready for the hotel, and it should start going vertical in January, according to AEG.

SteelCity15 · #**156** Posted **Aug 28, 2006, 1:00 AM**

Nice diagram...

BOF is coming along.

Dougall5505 · #**157** Posted **Aug 28, 2006, 1:16 AM**

not to nitpick or anything(your doing a great job) but it would be really cool if on your first post of this thread you lined up all the diagrams from every month you've done this thing so we can see the progress of these buildings from month to month.
just a thought...
keep up the good work

hoosier · #**158** Posted **Aug 28, 2006, 9:34 PM**

I believe 340 on the Park is much higher than is depicted in your diagram. Perhaps a Chicago forumer could corroborate this.

vpauzuolis · #**159** Posted **Aug 29, 2006, 7:37 AM**

so maybe 340on the park is topped out?

Chicago Skyline · #**160** Posted **Aug 29, 2006, 7:47 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by vpauzuolis

so maybe 340on the park is topped out?

Nope not yet, did you see the latest 340 OTP update pix?