HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


One Park Lane in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 9:13 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,107
Even then it's still missing several proposed high rises, One Vanderbilt, and the still to be shown Shvo Tower which may be 2,000 plus feet tall. New York City is going to be very dense. .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 9:14 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky88 View Post
1 Park Lane tower in the Central Park South context.

I forgot to include this in my post above. So yeah.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 9:19 PM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
Do not watermark YIMBY/Otie's work with your own logo thanks CC@moderators
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 10:05 PM
Sky88's Avatar
Sky88 Sky88 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 379
Please everyone to use this new image and remove the other from the site. Thanks


Credit: from YIMBY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 11:53 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is online now
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by generalscarr View Post
OMG, look at the shadows!
Better demolish the Palisades then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 3:41 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,495
That rendering is insane, I hope all of those towers and more get completed.
__________________
There’s no greater abomination to mankind and nature than Ryan Home developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 12:12 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
New Views, Interiors, Possible Herzog And De Meuron Design For 1 Park Lane, Aka 36 Central Park South *





Quote:
Last week, YIMBY revealed the exteriors for 1 Park Lane, which has an actual address of 36 Central Park South, the site of the current Helmsley Park Lane. While we speculated that Vinoly designed the building, we learned that Handel Architects was in fact behind the renderings; we have also obtained a new set of images which include that version of the project’s interiors and views, which will be very impressive.

Perhaps the most notable feature of the 1,210-foot tall tower is how it utilizes the old Helmsley Park Lane. Due to New York’s byzantine and nonsensical zoning, the developers of 36 Central Park South will be forced to maintain a percentage of the old Helmsley, the same quandary that L&L is facing in its redevelopment of 425 Park Avenue.

While the City Council finally approved the Midtown East rezoning yesterday, that still leaves sites like 36 Central Park South out of the mix. If the old Helmsley could be removed completely, a new tower that conforms to the street-wall facing Central Park could be built, but unfortunately, the city stands in the way.

Despite that challenge, the developers have made the best of the situation, and the majority of the Helmsley will become an enormous, 200-foot-tall entry foyer for the new tower. In essence, everything up to the height of the surrounding buildings will be empty, with the actual condominiums stacked on top, to take advantage of the views — the ultimate driving force behind 57th Street’s current boom.

The success of 432 Park Avenue and its enormous 10×10 foot windows has clearly echoed into Handel’s design for 36 Central Park South, where panes will measure 10×14 feet. Besides the glass, the building bears a surprising aesthetic similarity to the Trump Soho, also designed by Handel, almost as if it was stacked on itself three times (and whittled down substantially).

YIMBY received word from a different tipster who pointed out additional renderings, with a note that they show a design by Herzog and de Meuron, which may or may not be built instead of the Handel version.

While we have been unable to confirm Herzog and de Meuron’s involvement, YIMBY heard from another tipster who obtained images produced by Pelli Clarke Pelli, though apparently the firm’s entry did not win the design competition, and reflects a shorter, 800-foot tall version.

Evidently there was a substantial design competition for the building, but with the Handel version rendered in multiple formats and plastered on the building’s EB-5 materials, it would appear to be the final design (or close to it, especially given this 30-page PDF on the project, in Chinese). Still, changes could be possible, with Extell approaching the owners of 30 Central Park South for a possible buy, next door.

Per the EB-5 documents, the building will have 88 condominiums, and completion is slated for 2020.
=============================
http://www.yimbynews.com/2015/06/rev...ark-south.html
* http://www.yimbynews.com/wp-content/...B%E7%BB%8D.pdf (PDF for pics)

Last edited by chris08876; Jun 2, 2015 at 12:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 7:36 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 835
Clearly, there was a competition and Pelli and Herzog (and possibly Handel) participated. That being said, Witkoff's most recent statement is that Rogers will design the tower. The first rendering that Yimby posted looks like a Rogers design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 9:52 PM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR Ewing View Post
Clearly, there was a competition and Pelli and Herzog (and possibly Handel) participated. That being said, Witkoff's most recent statement is that Rogers will design the tower. The first rendering that Yimby posted looks like a Rogers design.
The first design Yimby posted was a Handel design, so I assume Handel won. Herzog and de Meuron’s design looks clunky, I can see why they probably didn't win.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2015, 10:33 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 835
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2015, 11:12 PM
ih8pickingusernames ih8pickingusernames is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
IamtheSTIG from SSC added this tower to that rendering showing NYC 2030.


Credit: IamtheSTIG
LOL even in 2030 the WTC isn't finished yet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2015, 12:04 AM
aquablue aquablue is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by ih8pickingusernames View Post
LOL even in 2030 the WTC isn't finished yet
LOL

The poor WTC has become a mere afterthought among skyscraper fans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2015, 12:03 PM
sparkling's Avatar
sparkling sparkling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 765



Images by Herzog and de Meuron

NIKOLAI FEDAK
JULY 7, 2015

Quote:
The new images of the Herzog & de Meuron design come from fresh EB-5 materials, possibly indicating that it has won the design competition. The tower appears to be about 1,000 feet tall, which is a fair bit shorter than Handel’s 1,210-foot tall plan, but still substantial enough to stand out on the Midtown skyline.
Full Article
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2015, 12:50 PM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,617
Also from the above, "No completion date has been announced, but it appears the project has now met its financing goals, which total $219 million in EB-5 funding, $462 million in developer equity, and a senior loan of $1.02 billion. The sellout is projected at an average of $8,500 a square foot."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2015, 4:57 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is online now
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Think I prefer the HdM design to the Handel design, even if it's a bit shorter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2015, 8:51 PM
Cynicism Cynicism is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 100
.

Last edited by Cynicism; Aug 10, 2020 at 10:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2015, 9:45 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 835
I don't think we've seen the final design. What's shown to EB-5 investors is not necessarily what is built. That has been demonstrated on many occasions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 8:11 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
Shvo, Witkoff look to get $800M in EB-5 funding Asian investors to finance 125 Greenwich, 1 Park Lane -
http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/07/....OH8GSI2D.dpuf



Quote:
New York’s luxury condo developers are getting a fresh dose of Chinese cash, courtesy of the EB-5 program.

The U.S. Immigration Fund, which helps arrange financing through the popular visa program, is raising a total of $800 million in mezzanine financing for four major construction projects:

Michael Shvo’s, Bizzi + Partners and Howard Lorber’s 125 Greenwich Street as well as Witkoff’s 111 Murray Street, Marriott Edition Hotel Times Square and 1 Park Lane.

Two of the deals – 125 Greenwich and Times Square Edition – have closed, while the fund is currently raising capital for the two others, U.S. Immigration Fund president Nicholas Mastroianni told The Real Deal.

The fundraising highlights the growing importance of Asian capital in financing major construction projects in Manhattan.

A prime example is 125 Greenwich, for which Mastroianni just began raising $175 million through the EB-5 program. Last year, Howard Michaels’ Carlton Group arranged $240 million in equity and debt financing for the condo project, with the bulk coming from an Asian lender group led by Singapore’s United Overseas Bank. The deal also included a $40million investment from Indian pharmaceutical tycoon Dilip Shanghvi.

If the U.S. Immigration Fund manages to raise the planned $175 million, the bulk of the 77-story Financial District condo project will be bankrolled by Asian capital.

And 111 Murray in nearby Tribeca, developed by Fisher Bros., Witkoff and Howard Lorber, is also getting a fat chunk of cash from the far east. Mastroianni said he has raised $175 million in mezzanine funding for the project through the EB-5 program.

This comes on top of the $229 million in equity Chinese investment firm Taiping Asset Management pumped into the project. In total, the planned 58-story condo tower is getting more than $400 million in Chinese capital.

Mastroianni also said he has raised $200 million for Witkoff’s Marriott Edition Hotel Times Square at 701 Seventh Avenue, and is raisiing another $220 million for Witkoff’s 1 Park Lane, the planned 1,210-foot-tall condo tower at 36 Central Park South on the site of the Helmsley Park Lane Hotel.

Witkoff declined to comment. SHVO and Fisher Brothers did not respond to requests for comment on short notice.

The EB-5 deals are part of a wave of foreign capital funding New York’s luxury condo boom. As The Real Deal reported in May, many of the tallest condo projects are being financed primarily by overseas firms. The Bank of China, for example, lent Vornado more than $1 billion for its condo project at 220 Central Park South.
__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 9:02 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 835
Great news!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2015, 5:52 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Nice!

I like the shorter version of this tower better design wise, hopefully they stick with that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:12 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.