HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2561  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 7:01 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Species: Homo Hamiltonus
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Burlington
Posts: 2,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillStreetBlues View Post
Jurisdictions that ostensibly pay for roads with gas taxes will have to move to VMT systems quickly. Because of the take-up of electric vehicles, but also because gasmobiles are becoming more efficient, and most importantly because they have mostly found it impossible to increase gas taxes. January was the 25th anniversary of the last time Ontario raised its gas tax. Moving to a VMT system means charging drivers in closer relation to the wear they actually put on the roads, but it's also an opportunity to increase taxation to actually cover the cost of the roads. It has to happen, and soon.

Remind me: is HSR increasing fares again this year? Improving service is good and necessary, but if fares go up, ridership will continue to decline, and Hamilton's share of the gas tax will remain flat or declining.
That's a logical replacement. Politically, VMT charging is likely to be a hot potato (especially for owners of electrics, unless the hydro rate issue cools off), though if mileage-based insurance starts becoming more popular that may help moderate perceptions. But any change in the taxation/fee system will be met with grumbling no matter how it's handled.

Re: the HSR fare increase, it was delayed too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2562  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 1:18 AM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,225
HSR riders left behind
(CATCH, May 1 2017)

In peak months, up to 50 HSR buses per day pass by stops without picking up waiting passengers because the bus is already full. These “pass-bys” that discourage transit use are most common along the future LRT corridor. And that won’t change soon because city council has ‘postponed’ system improvements.

In accepting the postponement, HSR staff warned that taxes will have to climb 1.15 percent just to meet next year’s transit funding needs. And it could be higher because staff assumed extra revenue from another fare increase this September that council also decided to postpone. The bus drivers’ contract is up for renegotiation next year, adding further financial pressures.

Most threatening to improving HSR ridership is a quarter-century council history of refusing to use new tax dollars to improve transit. That will be even more likely to continue in 2018 because it is a municipal election year when councillors try to keep tax hikes to an absolute minimum.

HSR statistics for the last two years show at least 200 pass-bys every month with peaks climbing over 1000 during the six busiest months. The pass-bys here don’t drop below 800 during either the September-November period or the January-March timeframe when most university students ride the HSR. This is consistent with data showing there are more passengers per bus in Hamilton than anywhere else in the GTA except Toronto.

If these pass-bys occur mainly during weekdays, that works out to at least 10 and up to 50 buses a day that are so overloaded as to be unable to pick up more passengers. The HSR pass-by report in late January didn’t garner any reaction from city councillors, who instead forced HSR staff to reduce their budget.

HSR graphs show most of the pass-bys are in the Main-King-Queenston corridor where LRT is to be located, exceeding 700 in five of the 24 months reported. But they also surpassed 100 in the majority of months for the mountain to downtown routes, and were even more frequent along other downtown routes…

Federal help for the HSR has also been delayed despite an announcement last summer of $1.5 billion for Ontario transit systems from Trudeau’s Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF). City staff calculated that would mean $36 million for Hamilton to spend on capital improvements and included the required city matching funds in the 2017 capital budget.

But council balked at the 0.45 percent tax hike and postponed budgeting for this windfall. That then became a key justification for cutting this year’s HSR budget on March 24.

“Given the delay of the PTIF announcement, the 2017 service enhancements will not be operationalized until 2018,” explained the reduced budget report. “Therefore, the operating costs associated with year 3 of the Strategy would be moved to 2018, extending the overall time horizon for completion of the 10 year plan beyond 2024.”

As it turned out, that report was approved by council just seven days before the formal federal announcement of the transit funding details for Hamilton and other Ontario cities. That leaves the city without the required matching funds in this year’s budget.



Read it in full here.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2563  
Old Posted May 26, 2017, 2:37 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 18,069
Starting on Monday HSR will provide free rides for cyclists up the escarpment.


Jason Thorne
https://twitter.com/JasonThorne_RPP


Jason Thorne
https://twitter.com/JasonThorne_RPP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2564  
Old Posted May 26, 2017, 3:11 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,342
Neat.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2565  
Old Posted May 28, 2017, 4:54 AM
mishap mishap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelTown View Post
Starting on Monday HSR will provide free rides for cyclists up the escarpment.
But not on Parkdale (the second pic). James Mtn Road only, and only from St Joseph's to Brantdale and vice-versa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2566  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2017, 3:36 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,260
Always wondered why the bus ads on the HSR were so terrible.

Despite Multi-Million Deficits, HSR Failed to Put Bus Ad Contract to Competitive Bid in 2015 & 2016

https://www.thepublicrecord.ca/2017/...-in-2015-2016/

Hamilton’s embattled transit division is facing another multi-million dollar shortfall this year, but despite successful advertising agencies, including Pattison and Corus Entertainment, seeking to offer the City more money for bus advertising, Council approved putting off competitive bids and failed to hold HSR managers to a 2015 deadline for the bids.

The HSR’s current advertising agent, StreetSeen Media, was awarded exclusivity in 2004 when they won a five year contract.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2567  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2017, 1:31 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,225
Back to the Future

Spotted this morning: HSR workers removing the MacNab Transit Terminal's System Maps which have been unchanged since they were installed at time of opening.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2568  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2017, 6:37 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,225
Via @joeycoleman:



In Feb 2015, the HSR’s Ten Year Local Transit Strategy anticipated year-over-year gains that would see the HSR net an additional 600K riders and $8.8M in revenue by year-end 2017.

Compared to the HSR's rosy projections, this revised outlook represents a loss of 1.4M riders and $13M in revenue in the same three-year span.

2015-2017 represents the HSR's second largest three-year ridership decline in 20 years (narrowly edged by the contraction of 1995-1997). Considered contra projected gains, it represents the second steepest HSR ridership decline of the last 25 years.

An under-acknowledged challenge to the HSR's core ridership is arguably the hike in monthly pass costs. (In Feb 2015, monthly passholders were said to represent 51% of HSR users.) The "adjusted" senior pass multiplier is notable in this regard. Seniors made up around 6% of HSR users in 2015, but Hamilton's seniors' passes were identified as 40% below the average of southern Ontario peers and promptly brought to level.

Sept 2015 Fare Increases
Cash Fare: 17.6%
Adult Ticket: 12.5%
Student Ticket: 8.8%
Adult Monthly Pass: 13.8%
Student Monthly Pass: 5.4%
Senior Monthly Pass: 24.4%

Sept 2016 Fare Increases
Cash Fare: 0.0%
Adult Ticket: 4.4%
Student Ticket: 2.9%
Adult Monthly Pass: 4.4%
Student Monthly Pass: 2.9%
Senior Monthly Pass: 16.7%


In the same document, the HSR chalked out its ridership calculus.

1% increase in fares = 0.2% to 0.5% decrease in ridership
1% increase in service = 0.5% to 0.7% increase in ridership


In other words, as long as fare hikes accompany service improvements, all is well.

And here's where much of the decline is rooted: Not in the advent of Uber or SoBi, or the fluctuations of OPEC, but in the policies of the HSR and the direction of council.

Council, which punted 2015 HSR system improvements into the second half of 2016.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Aug 10, 2017 at 10:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:11 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.