HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2012, 5:42 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
Professional Midwesterner
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Edgewater, Chicago
Posts: 17,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by new.slang View Post
That goes for any North Shore towns. It makes me sad we don't really have anything like them in Greater Toronto.....
the big reason for that can be explained by the data below:

metro chicago population 1930: ~4,365,000

metro toronto population 1931: ~810,000



metro toronto was simply a much, much smaller place than chicagoland back in the days of early 20th century suburban development.
__________________
He has to go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 7:19 PM
new.slang new.slang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 224
^mmhmm. suburban toronto is a mess, and for the most part awful. i've used google maps quite extensively and chicago seems to have lots of nice suburban areas (at least in the northern and western areas)

sorry to go off topic, but newer subdivisions suck. the lots are 40 feet wide, 20 of which constitute a double garage, because there is absolutely no where to walk to. and the houses are say maybe 10-15 feet away from the street making the area feel quite dense, without any of the benefits that comes with density. i'd much prefer to live in a pre war street car suburb or mid century ranch home thank you very much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 5:04 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
Professional Midwesterner
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Edgewater, Chicago
Posts: 17,799
^ that relatively high density single family home suburbia you see in metro toronto is not terribly common here in chicagoland. single family homes are generally given more breathing room here, but the suburbia being built today is still, for the most part, every bit as autocentric, disconnected, and mono-use, making for mind-numbingly boring communities.

i too much, MUCH prefer the suburbia of the early 20th century. it's the kind of suburbia i knew growing up in wilmette (north shore burb).

as mentioned before, toronto just wasn't a huge place yet when that early pattern of suburbia first developed. in fact, in 1930, toronto wouldn't have even ranked as one of the 10 largest metros in US/Canada.


1930 metro population:
  1. New York ---- 10,901,000
  2. Chicago ------- 4,365,000
  3. Philadelphia ---- 2,847,000
  4. Boston -------- 2,308,000
  5. Detroit -------- 2,105,000
  6. Pittsburgh ----- 1,954,000
  7. St. Louis ------ 1,294,000
  8. San Francisco - 1,290,000
  9. Cleveland ------ 1,195,000
  10. Montreal ------- 1,023,000
  11. Baltimore -------- 949,000
  12. Minneapolis ------ 832,000
  13. Buffalo ---------- 821,000
  14. Toronto --------- 810,000



another difference to consider is that chicago has had a large and fairly comprehensive commuter rail network serving its suburbs since the late 19th century, whereas commuter rail didn't really become a big thing in toronto until the 1960s. as a result chicagoland is littered with traditionally urban suburban town centers built around railroad stations that have been organically developing for over a century now.
__________________
He has to go.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Sep 5, 2012 at 5:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2012, 9:51 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 13,291
I'd like to add Libertyville as another decent suburban downtown.

Not at the level of a Naperville, Oak Park (or even close), but quaint & attractive, with the Metra stop within
vicinity. Also, there appears to be a good amount of housing development occurring near Libertyville's downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 9:30 PM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 994
This is more a suburban development post, but given that Orland Park is positioning this development (and location) to be its 'downtown', I feel that it should be posted here.

I just happened to drive past it a few days ago as I was visiting some family members, it is pretty imposing even from a passerby vantage point on LaGrange.

Ninety7Fifty on the Park (Gmaps link http://goo.gl/maps/gygCD )





http://www.ninety7fifty.com/


Phase One looks to be about 295 units, with some pretty ambitious pricing in my opinion. $1300+ for a one bedroom in the burbs is pretty steep.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 2:40 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 13,291
I like Oak Park but it seems to be stagnating. The way things are going, Naperville may soon eclipse it as Chicagoland's #2 downtown. I was in Naperville last week and there is a shitload of construction going on there. Plus you have the riverwalk.

Oak Park has the city feel and the better mass transit, but damn it I really hate how they have that goofy suburban shopping center with acres of parking right in the midst of downtown, and there seems to be very little new development happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 2:49 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
I like Oak Park but it seems to be stagnating. The way things are going, Naperville may soon eclipse it as Chicagoland's #2 downtown.
Oak Park and Naperville over Evanston? Nope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 3:06 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 13,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch.G, Ch.G View Post
Oak Park and Naperville over Evanston? Nope.
^ Oops, I should have said "Chicagoland's #2 suburban downtown".

Evanston is clearly perched at the top. But I think Oak Park may lose its #2 title soon if it doesn't get its act together
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 3:21 AM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Evanston is clearly perched at the top. But I think Oak Park may lose its #2 title soon if it doesn't get its act together
Even with the goofy shopping center on Lake street, Naperville is miles and miles behind Oak Park. A one block stretch on three streets does not magically overtake two separate destination commercial districts. Until Naperville starts treating its downtown more like a real neighborhood and less like a gimmick it will be remain down the list of suburban downtowns.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 5:03 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
atomic
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 12,572
If you think Oak Park is stagnating, you must not have realized where they started. There's been a huge amount of development there... the skyline is totally changed, the pedestrian malls have been removed, new public buildings have been constructed.

Lots of new buildings and proposals.


src

Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Oak Park has the city feel and the better mass transit, but damn it I really hate how they have that goofy suburban shopping center with acres of parking right in the midst of downtown, and there seems to be very little new development happening.
I know this is a technicality, but the "suburban shopping center" you're probably thinking of is actually in River Forest, since it's west of Harlem.

There is a similar development on the Oak Park side (has Gap and Old Navy), but the urban design is much better. That development appears to have a large amount of parking, but most of that is actually city-owned parking lots where a massive development is planned.

(proposed site plan as of 2008; details may have changed)

src
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 9:38 AM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,026
Yay a thread on my home town Oak Park
Here's another possible building, seems like there is lots of interest seeming multiple developers are eyeing it. http://www.oakpark.com/News/Articles...South-project/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 10:53 AM
ChiTownCity ChiTownCity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, USA
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
If you think Oak Park is stagnating, you must not have realized where they started. There's been a huge amount of development there... the skyline is totally changed, the pedestrian malls have been removed, new public buildings have been constructed.

Lots of new buildings and proposals.


src
^ Is this proposal still active?

Also, what ever happened to that 50 story high rise (kind of resembled the Legacy) that was proposed for Evanston a few years ago? I'm guessing it's completely dead by now but I remember that the plans were altered and resubmitted but haven't heard anything about it since then...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 1:14 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 608
That Orland Park development is huge, took out an old rundown strip mall also. And what is not seen in those picture is that they redid/upgraded the rail station next door to this development. Just cross a path to go from condo to train....Very nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 2:06 PM
MultiModal MultiModal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
That Orland Park development is huge, took out an old rundown strip mall also. And what is not seen in those picture is that they redid/upgraded the rail station next door to this development. Just cross a path to go from condo to train....Very nice.
The station itself is very nice but the SWS is one of the worst metra lines. From that station at 143rd it takes an hour to get into the city with no option for express trains even at rush hour. Don't get me wrong I like the development but there is a lot more to be done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 2:35 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 608
Express from Orland would be great, as part of the renovation i believe they built some extra track into that station, maybe for future express? or maybe for realignment of that bridge over lagrange. Also, they should expand service on the Heritage corridor, the lack of trains on that line is a joke.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 2:43 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 13,291
We've heard of proposals in Oak Park over the years but very little seems to be happening. I agree that it feels more 'genuine' than Naperville. I'm holding out hope for Oak Park, but you can't blame Naperville for trying. Once that hotel is built it will really do a lot to add even more vibrancy to its core
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 3:37 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiTownCity View Post
^ Is this proposal still active?

Also, what ever happened to that 50 story high rise (kind of resembled the Legacy) that was proposed for Evanston a few years ago? I'm guessing it's completely dead by now but I remember that the plans were altered and resubmitted but haven't heard anything about it since then...
Yes, the proposal is still active, but the developer is having a hard time getting it together.
http://oakpark.suntimes.com/news/lak...312013:article
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 6:56 PM
Segun's Avatar
Segun Segun is offline
Successful
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The good side of town.
Posts: 5,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
for their architecture alone, i've got to give props to downtown aurora and elgin. they're not the liveliest of places, but they have bigger bones than most suburban downtowns because they weren't built as burbs.
I'd Waukegan in the same category with them (along with Joliet). If these towns were in the LA Metro area, they'd be successful destinations to the extent of Pasadena or Santa Monica. Maybe someone will realize their potential in the next few decades. Then again, in that scenario, Gary would of been like Long Beach. This is one of the many reasons I find the LA metro so interesting, cause a lot of its like a Mediterranean looking, west coast version of what the bungalow belt might have looked like had urban Chicagoland kept growing.

There's some others not mentioned too, such as

Whiting, Indiana.
http://goo.gl/maps/mmSZ9

Michigan City, IN (would this be considered a suburb or sattelite city?)
http://goo.gl/maps/zjUZ7

Edit, I saw Joliet mentioned already.

Last edited by Segun; Feb 9, 2014 at 7:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 9:28 PM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Segun View Post
Then again, in that scenario, Gary would of been like Long Beach.
Yeah, because the largest Pacific Ocean port in North America is toooootally comparable to a mid continent Steel Mill town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2014, 9:40 PM
Segun's Avatar
Segun Segun is offline
Successful
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The good side of town.
Posts: 5,284
tooooooooooootaally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:43 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.