HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2017, 10:39 PM
TimeAgain TimeAgain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 150
Now if we can just get 1000 S going, Chicago's skyline will be changed forever.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2017, 1:13 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,662
January 3, 2017



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 9:38 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,064
Is that East-West University building going to continue unchanged as far as we know right now?

Last edited by denizen467; Jan 8, 2017 at 7:02 AM. Reason: comment criticizing a preceding post became irrelevant when moderators deleted that post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 10:33 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 13,872
I don't think the design is bad. The vertical columns on the north/south facades save it and remind me a bit of Inland Steel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 1:23 PM
KWILLSKYLINE's Avatar
KWILLSKYLINE KWILLSKYLINE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 487
Doe's anyone have a link to the schedule of this project. Just wondering if the hotel rehab is going to shut down the whole hotel or if they are going to do a floor by floor type of thing? Also will that portion coincide with the tower portion or after the tower is finished?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 1:36 PM
KWILLSKYLINE's Avatar
KWILLSKYLINE KWILLSKYLINE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 487
"Is that East-West University building going to continue unchanged as far as we know right now? " ^^^^

I wouldnt be surprised that east/west wouldnt try to build something like Spertus did with the prime location in the next 10-20 years. Then again I have no idea about enrollement of east/west or their financial situation. It would be sick to see another Roosevelt U type of highrise along mich.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 1:43 PM
Skyguy_7's Avatar
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,488
When I Google Essex Inn and this pops up, I get so sad. Hopefully HPA re-introduces it somewhere else down the road...in Chicago of course.


Via Crains.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 3:23 PM
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
I don't think the design is bad. The vertical columns on the north/south facades save it and remind me a bit of Inland Steel.
I'd been thinking the same thing. I miss the original stilts, but prefer the new tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 3:38 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,031
I prefer the newer tower as well.
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 5:54 PM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago—West Loop
Posts: 798
I prefer the current version as well - the stilts were a bit gimmicky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 8:48 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc5680 View Post
I prefer the current version as well - the stilts were a bit gimmicky.
I'll take a bit gimmicky over generic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2017, 10:47 PM
Bombardier Bombardier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWILLSKYLINE View Post
Doe's anyone have a link to the schedule of this project. Just wondering if the hotel rehab is going to shut down the whole hotel or if they are going to do a floor by floor type of thing? Also will that portion coincide with the tower portion or after the tower is finished?
The whole hotel will shut down for 8 months with the reopening of the hotel occurring about the same time as the tower opening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 1:52 AM
Rocket49 Rocket49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 83
I noticed that the Essex Inn is a landmark property.

I was wondering how the landmark designation works.

To me as a layman, the Essex Inn is a nice looking hotel from the 1960's, but doesn't look like something I would think would typically be landmarked.

I was wondering, is the main reason the Essex Inn is landmarked is because it's on Michigan Avenue across from Grant Park?

Or is the hotel landmarked because the city has an interest in seeing that architecture from the 1960's is preserved?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 2:43 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket49 View Post
I noticed that the Essex Inn is a landmark property.

I was wondering how the landmark designation works.

To me as a layman, the Essex Inn is a nice looking hotel from the 1960's, but doesn't look like something I would think would typically be landmarked.

I was wondering, is the main reason the Essex Inn is landmarked is because it's on Michigan Avenue across from Grant Park?

Or is the hotel landmarked because the city has an interest in seeing that architecture from the 1960's is preserved?
The developers asked for it to be landmarked as a part of the project and I'm sure they'll apply for tax credits.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 3:31 AM
Rocket49 Rocket49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
The developers asked for it to be landmarked as a part of the project and I'm sure they'll apply for tax credits.
Thanks for the info.

But I assume there are at least some standards for what can be approved as a landmark?

For instance , I hope it would not be possible for a McDonalds built in 2005 to be classified as a landmark
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 2:46 PM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket49 View Post
Thanks for the info.

But I assume there are at least some standards for what can be approved as a landmark?

For instance , I hope it would not be possible for a McDonalds built in 2005 to be classified as a landmark
Generally a building must be at least 50 years old in order to be considered for landmark status, though exceptions have been made for exceptional examples, such as with the Daley Center and Inland Steel Building. A building must also have high integrity, that is largely unaltered or easily restorable to it's original construction or period of significance. Those are the base lines to be eligible, but to be designated, building must also be shown to meet 2 of seven criteria: importance to city heritage, association with a significant event, association with an important person, important architecture movement, important architect, distinctive theme as a district, or unique visual features.

In the case of Essex, it qualified for designation as 1. an important work by architect A. Epstein and Sons, 2. as a postwar building within the existing Michigan Boulevard Landmark District (per a study that was conducted this summer to expand the period of significance for the district), and 3. as a highly intact example of the International Style (and fairly early example at that)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 3:55 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,449
Landmarks is interested in broadening its protection of midcentury modernism in Chicago, and extracted a promise to restore the existing hotel as they began discussions of approving the new building. On paper, it may look to BVictor1 like the owner requested the designation, but that's not my understanding of the actual dynamics of the negotiation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 7:59 PM
Rocket49 Rocket49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 83
Thanks for the info on landmarking, guys. Very interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 8:06 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Team Alinghi
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 792
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
The developers asked for it to be landmarked as a part of the project and I'm sure they'll apply for tax credits.
https://twitter.com/ChicagoDPD/statu...82113774198786

You don't say...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2017, 4:35 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
atomic
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 12,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Landmarks is interested in broadening its protection of midcentury modernism in Chicago, and extracted a promise to restore the existing hotel as they began discussions of approving the new building. On paper, it may look to BVictor1 like the owner requested the designation, but that's not my understanding of the actual dynamics of the negotiation.
Unfortunately it seems like much of the best midcentury modernism (outside of downtown) is located in bungalow belt areas that are unlikely to really appreciate modernism.

Even North Federal Savings and Loan at North/LaSalle ended up being rejected as a landmark, in part due to neighborhood opposition. This in a neighborhood full of prosperous, educated folks that shop at Crate and Barrel and Design Within Reach...
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:24 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.